Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Campanario, J.M."
  1. Campanario, J.M.: Large increases and decreases in journal impact factors in only one year : the effect of journal self-citations (2011) 0.06
    0.0564964 = product of:
      0.1129928 = sum of:
        0.1129928 = sum of:
          0.07054652 = weight(_text_:2007 in 4187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07054652 = score(doc=4187,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20205033 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044755515 = queryNorm
              0.34915322 = fieldWeight in 4187, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4187)
          0.042446278 = weight(_text_:22 in 4187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042446278 = score(doc=4187,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15672618 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044755515 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4187, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4187)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    I studied the factors (citations, self-citations, and number of articles) that influenced large changes in only 1 year in the impact factors (IFs) of journals. A set of 360 instances of journals with large increases or decreases in their IFs from a given year to the following was selected from journals in the Journal Citation Reports from 1998 to 2007 (40 journals each year). The main factor influencing large changes was the change in the number of citations. About 54% of the increases and 42% of the decreases in the journal IFs were associated with changes in the journal self-citations.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 12:53:00
  2. Campanario, J.M.: Distribution of ranks of articles and citations in journals (2010) 0.03
    0.025195187 = product of:
      0.050390374 = sum of:
        0.050390374 = product of:
          0.10078075 = sum of:
            0.10078075 = weight(_text_:2007 in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10078075 = score(doc=3340,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20205033 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044755515 = queryNorm
                0.49879032 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    I studied the distribution of articles and citations in journals between 1998 and 2007 according to an empirical function with two exponents. These variables showed good fit to a beta function with two exponents.
  3. González, L.; Campanario, J.M.: Structure of the impact factor of journals included in the Social Sciences Citation Index : citations from documents labeled "Editorial Material" (2007) 0.02
    0.023902256 = product of:
      0.047804512 = sum of:
        0.047804512 = product of:
          0.095609024 = sum of:
            0.095609024 = weight(_text_:2007 in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095609024 = score(doc=75,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20205033 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044755515 = queryNorm
                0.47319412 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.2, S.252-262
    Year
    2007
  4. Campanario, J.M.; Acedo, E.: Rejecting highly cited papers : the views of scientists who encounter resistance to their discoveries from other scientists (2007) 0.02
    0.023902256 = product of:
      0.047804512 = sum of:
        0.047804512 = product of:
          0.095609024 = sum of:
            0.095609024 = weight(_text_:2007 in 273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.095609024 = score(doc=273,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20205033 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044755515 = queryNorm
                0.47319412 = fieldWeight in 273, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=273)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.5, S.734-743
    Year
    2007
  5. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.01
    0.009095631 = product of:
      0.018191261 = sum of:
        0.018191261 = product of:
          0.036382522 = sum of:
            0.036382522 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036382522 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15672618 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044755515 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles