Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Didegah, F."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Didegah, F.; Thelwall, M.: Determinants of research citation impact in nanoscience and nanotechnology (2013) 0.02
    0.021378826 = product of:
      0.042757653 = sum of:
        0.042757653 = product of:
          0.085515305 = sum of:
            0.085515305 = weight(_text_:2007 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.085515305 = score(doc=737,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20205033 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044755515 = queryNorm
                0.42323765 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study investigates a range of metrics available when a nanoscience and nanotechnology article is published to see which metrics correlate more with the number of citations to the article. It also introduces the degree of internationality of journals and references as new metrics for this purpose. The journal impact factor; the impact of references; the internationality of authors, journals, and references; and the number of authors, institutions, and references were all calculated for papers published in nanoscience and nanotechnology journals in the Web of Science from 2007 to 2009. Using a zero-inflated negative binomial regression model on the data set, the impact factor of the publishing journal and the citation impact of the cited references were found to be the most effective determinants of citation counts in all four time periods. In the entire 2007 to 2009 period, apart from journal internationality and author numbers and internationality, all other predictor variables had significant effects on citation counts.
  2. Didegah, F.; Thelwall, M.: Co-saved, co-tweeted, and co-cited networks (2018) 0.01
    0.009095631 = product of:
      0.018191261 = sum of:
        0.018191261 = product of:
          0.036382522 = sum of:
            0.036382522 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036382522 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15672618 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044755515 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 7.2018 10:00:22