Search (29 results, page 1 of 2)

Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007) 0.05

0.05499648 = product of:
  0.10999296 = sum of:
    0.10999296 = sum of:
      0.079674184 = weight(_text_:2007 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.079674184 = score(doc=1291,freq=5.0), product of:
          0.20205033 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044755515 = queryNorm
          0.39432842 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
            2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
              5.0 = termFreq=5.0
            4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
      0.030318772 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030318772 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15672618 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044755515 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content: Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
Year: 2007

Bentley, C.M.; Labelle, P.R.: ¬A comparison of social tagging designs and user participation (2008) 0.03
```
0.03228366 = product of:
  0.06456732 = sum of:
    0.06456732 = sum of:
      0.0403123 = weight(_text_:2007 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0403123 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20205033 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044755515 = queryNorm
          0.19951613 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
      0.024255017 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024255017 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15672618 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044755515 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Social tagging empowers users to categorize content in a personally meaningful way while harnessing their potential to contribute to a collaborative construction of knowledge (Vander Wal, 2007). In addition, social tagging systems offer innovative filtering mechanisms that facilitate resource discovery and browsing (Mathes, 2004). As a result, social tags may support online communication, informal or intended learning as well as the development of online communities. The purpose of this mixed methods study is to examine how undergraduate students participate in social tagging activities in order to learn about their motivations, behaviours and practices. A better understanding of their knowledge, habits and interactions with such systems will help practitioners and developers identify important factors when designing enhancements. In the first phase of the study, students enrolled at a Canadian university completed 103 questionnaires. Quantitative results focusing on general familiarity with social tagging, frequently used Web 2.0 sites, and the purpose for engaging in social tagging activities were compiled. Eight questionnaire respondents participated in follow-up semi-structured interviews that further explored tagging practices by situating questionnaire responses within concrete experiences using popular websites such as YouTube, Facebook, Del.icio.us, and Flickr. Preliminary results of this study echo findings found in the growing literature concerning social tagging from the fields of computer science (Sen et al., 2006) and information science (Golder & Huberman, 2006; Macgregor & McCulloch, 2006). Generally, two classes of social taggers emerge: those who focus on tagging for individual purposes, and those who view tagging as a way to share or communicate meaning to others. Heavy del.icio.us users, for example, were often focused on simply organizing their own content, and seemed to be conscientiously maintaining their own personally relevant categorizations while, in many cases, placing little importance on the tags of others. Conversely, users tagging items primarily to share content preferred to use specific terms to optimize retrieval and discovery by others. Our findings should inform practitioners of how interaction design can be tailored for different tagging systems applications, and how these findings are positioned within the current debate surrounding social tagging among the resource discovery community. We also hope to direct future research in the field to place a greater importance on exploring the benefits of tagging as a socially-driven endeavour rather than uniquely as a means of managing information.

Source

Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

Shiri, A.: Trend analysis in social tagging : an LIS perspective (2007) 0.03

0.031869676 = product of:
  0.06373935 = sum of:
    0.06373935 = product of:
      0.1274787 = sum of:
        0.1274787 = weight(_text_:2007 in 529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1274787 = score(doc=529,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20205033 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044755515 = queryNorm
            0.6309255 = fieldWeight in 529, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=529)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content: Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".
Year: 2007

Regulski, K.: Aufwand und Nutzen beim Einsatz von Social-Bookmarking-Services als Nachweisinstrument für wissenschaftliche Forschungsartikel am Beispiel von BibSonomy (2007) 0.03

0.031869676 = product of:
  0.06373935 = sum of:
    0.06373935 = product of:
      0.1274787 = sum of:
        0.1274787 = weight(_text_:2007 in 4595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1274787 = score(doc=4595,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20205033 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044755515 = queryNorm
            0.6309255 = fieldWeight in 4595, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4595)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 31(2007) H.2, S.177-184
Year: 2007

Farkas, M.G.: Social software in libraries : building collaboration, communication, and community online (2007) 0.03

0.02828153 = product of:
  0.05656306 = sum of:
    0.05656306 = product of:
      0.11312612 = sum of:
        0.11312612 = weight(_text_:2007 in 2364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11312612 = score(doc=2364,freq=7.0), product of:
            0.20205033 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044755515 = queryNorm
            0.5598908 = fieldWeight in 2364, product of:
              2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
                7.0 = termFreq=7.0
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2364)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Classification: Z674.75.I58 F37 2007
LCC: Z674.75.I58 F37 2007
Year: 2007

Tonkin, E.; Baptista, A.A.; Hooland, S. van; Resmini, A.; Mendéz, E.; Neville, L.: Kinds of Tags : a collaborative research study on tag usage and structure (2007) 0.03

0.027885964 = product of:
  0.05577193 = sum of:
    0.05577193 = product of:
      0.11154386 = sum of:
        0.11154386 = weight(_text_:2007 in 531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11154386 = score(doc=531,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20205033 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044755515 = queryNorm
            0.55205977 = fieldWeight in 531, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=531)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content: Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".
Year: 2007

Abbas, J.: In the margins : reflections on scribbles (2007) 0.03

0.027885964 = product of:
  0.05577193 = sum of:
    0.05577193 = product of:
      0.11154386 = sum of:
        0.11154386 = weight(_text_:2007 in 659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11154386 = score(doc=659,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20205033 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044755515 = queryNorm
            0.55205977 = fieldWeight in 659, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=659)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Knowledge organization. 34(2007) no.2, S.72-77
Year: 2007

Furner, J.: User tagging of library resources : toward a framework for system evaluation (2007) 0.02

0.023902256 = product of:
  0.047804512 = sum of:
    0.047804512 = product of:
      0.095609024 = sum of:
        0.095609024 = weight(_text_:2007 in 703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.095609024 = score(doc=703,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20205033 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044755515 = queryNorm
            0.47319412 = fieldWeight in 703, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=703)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content: Vortrag anlässlich: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 73RD IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL 19-23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa. - 157 - Classification and Indexing
Year: 2007

Rafferty, P.; Hidderley, R.: Flickr and democratic Indexing : dialogic approaches to indexing (2007) 0.02

0.023902256 = product of:
  0.047804512 = sum of:
    0.047804512 = product of:
      0.095609024 = sum of:
        0.095609024 = weight(_text_:2007 in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.095609024 = score(doc=752,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20205033 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044755515 = queryNorm
            0.47319412 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Aslib proceedings. 59(2007) no.4/5, S.397-410
Year: 2007

Heckner, M.; Mühlbacher, S.; Wolff, C.: Tagging tagging : a classification model for user keywords in scientific bibliography management systems (2007) 0.02
```
0.023635183 = product of:
  0.047270365 = sum of:
    0.047270365 = product of:
      0.09454073 = sum of:
        0.09454073 = weight(_text_:2007 in 533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09454073 = score(doc=533,freq=11.0), product of:
            0.20205033 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044755515 = queryNorm
            0.46790683 = fieldWeight in 533, product of:
              3.3166249 = tf(freq=11.0), with freq of:
                11.0 = termFreq=11.0
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=533)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Recently, a growing amount of systems that allow personal content annotation (tagging) are being created, ranging from personal sites for organising bookmarks (del.icio.us), photos (flickr.com) or videos (video.google.com, youtube.com) to systems for managing bibliographies for scientific research projects (citeulike.org, connotea.org). Simultaneously, a debate on the pro and cons of allowing users to add personal keywords to digital content has arisen. One recurrent point-of-discussion is whether tagging can solve the well-known vocabulary problem: In order to support successful retrieval in complex environments, it is necessary to index an object with a variety of aliases (cf. Furnas 1987). In this spirit, social tagging enhances the pool of rigid, traditional keywording by adding user-created retrieval vocabularies. Furthermore, tagging goes beyond simple personal content-based keywords by providing meta-keywords like funny or interesting that "identify qualities or characteristics" (Golder and Huberman 2006, Kipp and Campbell 2006, Kipp 2007, Feinberg 2006, Kroski 2005). Contrarily, tagging systems are claimed to lead to semantic difficulties that may hinder the precision and recall of tagging systems (e.g. the polysemy problem, cf. Marlow 2006, Lakoff 2005, Golder and Huberman 2006). Empirical research on social tagging is still rare and mostly from a computer linguistics or librarian point-of-view (Voß 2007) which focus either on the automatic statistical analyses of large data sets, or intellectually inspect single cases of tag usage: Some scientists studied the evolution of tag vocabularies and tag distribution in specific systems (Golder and Huberman 2006, Hammond 2005). Others concentrate on tagging behaviour and tagger characteristics in collaborative systems. (Hammond 2005, Kipp and Campbell 2007, Feinberg 2006, Sen 2006). However, little research has been conducted on the functional and linguistic characteristics of tags.1 An analysis of these patterns could show differences between user wording and conventional keywording. In order to provide a reasonable basis for comparison, a classification system for existing tags is needed.

Content

Präsentation während der Veranstaltung "Networked Knowledge Organization Systems and Services: The 6th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems (NKOS) Workshop, Workshop at the 11th ECDL Conference, Budapest, Hungary, September 21st 2007".

Year

2007

Simon, D.: Anreicherung bibliothekarischer Titeldaten durch Tagging : Möglichkeiten und Probleme (2007) 0.02

0.021600373 = product of:
  0.043200746 = sum of:
    0.043200746 = product of:
      0.08640149 = sum of:
        0.08640149 = weight(_text_:2007 in 530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08640149 = score(doc=530,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.20205033 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044755515 = queryNorm
            0.42762363 = fieldWeight in 530, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=530)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Year: 2007

Munk, T.B.; Moerk, K.: Folksonomies, tagging communities, and tagging strategies : an empirical study (2007) 0.02

0.019918546 = product of:
  0.039837092 = sum of:
    0.039837092 = product of:
      0.079674184 = sum of:
        0.079674184 = weight(_text_:2007 in 1091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079674184 = score(doc=1091,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20205033 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044755515 = queryNorm
            0.39432842 = fieldWeight in 1091, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Knowledge organization. 34(2007) no.3, S.115-127
Year: 2007

Panke, S.; Gaiser, B.: "With my head up in the clouds" : Social Tagging aus Nutzersicht (2008) 0.02
```
0.015117113 = product of:
  0.030234225 = sum of:
    0.030234225 = product of:
      0.06046845 = sum of:
        0.06046845 = weight(_text_:2007 in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06046845 = score(doc=2883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205033 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044755515 = queryNorm
            0.2992742 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

28 Prozent der amerikanischen Internetnutzer/innen haben es bereits getan: Das freie Verschlagworten von Inhalten aller Art per Social Tagging gehört zu den Anwendungen aus dem Kontext von Web 2.0, die sich zunehmender Beliebtheit erfreuen (Rainie, 2007). Während sich die bisherige Forschung überwiegend inhaltsanalytisch mit dem Phänomen befasst, kommen im vorliegenden Beitrag so genannte "Power User" zu Wort. Um zu einer fundierteren Interpretation der in den Inhaltsanalysen gewonnenen Erkenntnisse beizutragen, wurden Interviews mit Personen durchgeführt, die mehrere Tagging Systeme parallel einsetzen, sich auch mit den technischen Grundlagen auskennen und als "Early Adopter" bereits seit geraumer Zeit aktiv sind. Entsprechend leitet der Beitrag von einer Synopse der aktuellen Literatur in die beschriebene Studie über und schließt mit einem Ausblick auf zukünftige Forschungsvorhaben im Kontext von Social Tagging.
Ding, Y.; Jacob, E.K.; Zhang, Z.; Foo, S.; Yan, E.; George, N.L.; Guo, L.: Perspectives on social tagging (2009) 0.02
```
0.015117113 = product of:
  0.030234225 = sum of:
    0.030234225 = product of:
      0.06046845 = sum of:
        0.06046845 = weight(_text_:2007 in 3290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06046845 = score(doc=3290,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205033 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044755515 = queryNorm
            0.2992742 = fieldWeight in 3290, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3290)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Social tagging is one of the major phenomena transforming the World Wide Web from a static platform into an actively shared information space. This paper addresses various aspects of social tagging, including different views on the nature of social tagging, how to make use of social tags, and how to bridge social tagging with other Web functionalities; it discusses the use of facets to facilitate browsing and searching of tagging data; and it presents an analogy between bibliometrics and tagometrics, arguing that established bibliometric methodologies can be applied to analyze tagging behavior on the Web. Based on the Upper Tag Ontology (UTO), a Web crawler was built to harvest tag data from Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube in September 2007. In total, 1.8 million objects, including bookmarks, photos, and videos, 3.1 million taggers, and 12.1 million tags were collected and analyzed. Some tagging patterns and variations are identified and discussed.

Web-2.0-Dienste als Ergänzung zu algorithmischen Suchmaschinen (2008) 0.02

0.015117113 = product of:
  0.030234225 = sum of:
    0.030234225 = product of:
      0.06046845 = sum of:
        0.06046845 = weight(_text_:2007 in 4323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06046845 = score(doc=4323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205033 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044755515 = queryNorm
            0.2992742 = fieldWeight in 4323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4323)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Issue: Ergebnisse des Fachprojektes "Einbindung von Frage-Antwort-Diensten in die Web-Suche" am Department Information der Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg (WS 2007/2008).

Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008) 0.01

0.012127508 = product of:
  0.024255017 = sum of:
    0.024255017 = product of:
      0.048510034 = sum of:
        0.048510034 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048510034 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15672618 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044755515 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Pages: S.15-22

Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.01

0.010719304 = product of:
  0.021438608 = sum of:
    0.021438608 = product of:
      0.042877216 = sum of:
        0.042877216 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042877216 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15672618 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044755515 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Pages: S.14-22
Source: Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008) 0.01

0.0106115695 = product of:
  0.021223139 = sum of:
    0.021223139 = product of:
      0.042446278 = sum of:
        0.042446278 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042446278 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15672618 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044755515 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 21. 6.2009 12:22:44

Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.01

0.009095631 = product of:
  0.018191261 = sum of:
    0.018191261 = product of:
      0.036382522 = sum of:
        0.036382522 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036382522 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15672618 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044755515 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 1. 8.2010 12:35:22

Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009) 0.01

0.009095631 = product of:
  0.018191261 = sum of:
    0.018191261 = product of:
      0.036382522 = sum of:
        0.036382522 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036382522 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15672618 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044755515 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Search (29 results, page 1 of 2)

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications