Search (32 results, page 1 of 2)

Keilty, P.: Tabulating queer : space, perversion, and belonging (2009) 0.02

0.022432912 = product of:
  0.06729873 = sum of:
    0.06729873 = product of:
      0.13459747 = sum of:
        0.13459747 = weight(_text_:2009 in 3253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13459747 = score(doc=3253,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04470347 = queryNorm
            0.64867973 = fieldWeight in 3253, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3253)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source: Knowledge organization. 36(2009) no.4, S.240-248
Year: 2009

McCool, M.; St. Amant, K.: Field dependence and classification : implications for global information systems (2009) 0.02

0.019628797 = product of:
  0.05888639 = sum of:
    0.05888639 = product of:
      0.11777278 = sum of:
        0.11777278 = weight(_text_:2009 in 2854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11777278 = score(doc=2854,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04470347 = queryNorm
            0.56759477 = fieldWeight in 2854, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2854)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.6, S.1258-1266
Year: 2009

Foskett, D.J.: Facet analysis (2009) 0.02

0.017376456 = product of:
  0.05212937 = sum of:
    0.05212937 = product of:
      0.10425874 = sum of:
        0.10425874 = weight(_text_:2009 in 3754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10425874 = score(doc=3754,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04470347 = queryNorm
            0.5024651 = fieldWeight in 3754, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3754)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Year: 2009

Grove, A.: Taxonomy (2009) 0.02

0.0152044 = product of:
  0.0456132 = sum of:
    0.0456132 = product of:
      0.0912264 = sum of:
        0.0912264 = weight(_text_:2009 in 3846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0912264 = score(doc=3846,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04470347 = queryNorm
            0.43965697 = fieldWeight in 3846, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3846)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Year: 2009

Giunchiglia, F.; Zaihrayeu, I.; Farazi, F.: Converting classifications into OWL ontologies (2009) 0.01

0.013032343 = product of:
  0.03909703 = sum of:
    0.03909703 = product of:
      0.07819406 = sum of:
        0.07819406 = weight(_text_:2009 in 4690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07819406 = score(doc=4690,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04470347 = queryNorm
            0.37684885 = fieldWeight in 4690, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4690)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Year: 2009

Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.01

0.012113405 = product of:
  0.036340214 = sum of:
    0.036340214 = product of:
      0.07268043 = sum of:
        0.07268043 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07268043 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04470347 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 1. 8.1996 22:01:00

Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.01

0.012113405 = product of:
  0.036340214 = sum of:
    0.036340214 = product of:
      0.07268043 = sum of:
        0.07268043 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07268043 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04470347 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 1. 8.1996 22:01:00

Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.01

0.012113405 = product of:
  0.036340214 = sum of:
    0.036340214 = product of:
      0.07268043 = sum of:
        0.07268043 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07268043 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04470347 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 6. 5.2017 18:46:22

Blake, J.: Some issues in the classification of zoology (2011) 0.01

0.008867388 = product of:
  0.026602162 = sum of:
    0.026602162 = product of:
      0.053204324 = sum of:
        0.053204324 = weight(_text_:2009 in 4845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053204324 = score(doc=4845,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04470347 = queryNorm
            0.2564132 = fieldWeight in 4845, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4845)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content: This paper is based on a thesis of the same title, completed as part of an MA in Library and Information Studies at University College London in 2009, and available at http://62.32.98.6/elibsql2uk_Z10300UK_Documents/Catalogued_PDFs/ Some_issues_in_the_classification_of_zoology.PDF. Thanks are due to Vanda Broughton, who supervised the MA thesis; and to Diane Tough of the Natural History Museum, London and Ann Sylph of the Zoological Society of London, who both provided valuable insights into the classification of zoological literature.

Frické, M.: Logical division (2016) 0.01
```
0.008867388 = product of:
  0.026602162 = sum of:
    0.026602162 = product of:
      0.053204324 = sum of:
        0.053204324 = weight(_text_:2009 in 3183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053204324 = score(doc=3183,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04470347 = queryNorm
            0.2564132 = fieldWeight in 3183, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3183)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

Division is obviously important to Knowledge Organization. Typically, an organizational infrastructure might acknowledge three types of connecting relationships: class hierarchies, where some classes are subclasses of others, partitive hierarchies, where some items are parts of others, and instantiation, where some items are members of some classes (see Z39.19 ANSI/NISO 2005 as an example). The first two of these involve division (the third, instantiation, does not involve division). Logical division would usually be a part of hierarchical classification systems, which, in turn, are central to shelving in libraries, to subject classification schemes, to controlled vocabularies, and to thesauri. Partitive hierarchies, and partitive division, are often essential to controlled vocabularies, thesauri, and subject tagging systems. Partitive hierarchies also relate to the bearers of information; for example, a journal would typically have its component articles as parts and, in turn, they might have sections as their parts, and, of course, components might be arrived at by partitive division (see Tillett 2009 as an illustration). Finally, verbal division, disambiguating homographs, is basic to controlled vocabularies. Thus Division is a broad and relevant topic. This article, though, is going to focus on Logical Division.

Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996) 0.01

0.008075604 = product of:
  0.02422681 = sum of:
    0.02422681 = product of:
      0.04845362 = sum of:
        0.04845362 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04845362 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04470347 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 22. 4.1997 21:10:19

Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.01

0.008075604 = product of:
  0.02422681 = sum of:
    0.02422681 = product of:
      0.04845362 = sum of:
        0.04845362 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04845362 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04470347 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source: Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23

Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.01

0.008075604 = product of:
  0.02422681 = sum of:
    0.02422681 = product of:
      0.04845362 = sum of:
        0.04845362 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04845362 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04470347 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 27. 5.2007 22:19:35

Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018) 0.01

0.008075604 = product of:
  0.02422681 = sum of:
    0.02422681 = product of:
      0.04845362 = sum of:
        0.04845362 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04845362 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04470347 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Pages: S.1-22

Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996) 0.01

0.007066153 = product of:
  0.021198459 = sum of:
    0.021198459 = product of:
      0.042396918 = sum of:
        0.042396918 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042396918 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04470347 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote: Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95

Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001) 0.01

0.007066153 = product of:
  0.021198459 = sum of:
    0.021198459 = product of:
      0.042396918 = sum of:
        0.042396918 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042396918 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04470347 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.01

0.007066153 = product of:
  0.021198459 = sum of:
    0.021198459 = product of:
      0.042396918 = sum of:
        0.042396918 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042396918 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04470347 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Pages: S.22-36

Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.01

0.0060567027 = product of:
  0.018170107 = sum of:
    0.018170107 = product of:
      0.036340214 = sum of:
        0.036340214 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036340214 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04470347 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source: Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47

Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.01

0.0060567027 = product of:
  0.018170107 = sum of:
    0.018170107 = product of:
      0.036340214 = sum of:
        0.036340214 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036340214 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04470347 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 22.12.2007 17:22:31

Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010) 0.01
```
0.0060567027 = product of:
  0.018170107 = sum of:
    0.018170107 = product of:
      0.036340214 = sum of:
        0.036340214 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036340214 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04470347 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)

Search (32 results, page 1 of 2)

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes