Search (831 results, page 1 of 42)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.05 
    0.04733397 = product of:
  0.14200191 = sum of:
    0.14200191 = product of:
      0.42600572 = sum of:
        0.42600572 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.42600572 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3789965 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04470347 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010) 0.05 
    0.047227852 = product of:
  0.14168355 = sum of:
    0.14168355 = sum of:
      0.090290725 = weight(_text_:2009 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.090290725 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.43514758 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
      0.05139283 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05139283 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
    Date
    22. 1.2010 15:06:54
  3. Bertram, J.: Stand der unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Großunternehmen (2013) 0.05 
    0.047227852 = product of:
  0.14168355 = sum of:
    0.14168355 = sum of:
      0.090290725 = weight(_text_:2009 in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.090290725 = score(doc=2658,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.43514758 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
      0.05139283 = weight(_text_:22 in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05139283 = score(doc=2658,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Dass eine erfolgreiche Suche nach im Unternehmen vorhandenen Informationen oftmals schwieriger zu bewerkstelligen ist als eine Suche im Internet, wird in der Privatwirtschaft zunehmend als Problem gesehen. Enterprise Search ist eine Strategie, diesem Problem zu begegnen. In einer Studie mit explorativem Charakter wurde der Frage nachgegangen, wie es um den Stand unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Unternehmen bestellt ist. m Rahmen einer Onlinebefragung wurden dazu im März / April 2009 469 Unternehmen befragt. Es beteiligten sich 104 Unternehmen. Das entspricht einem Rücklauf von 22 %. Dieser Beitrag gibt Auskunft über Status quo der unternehmensweiten Informationsorganisation und -suche in Österreich und benennt unternehmens- bzw. personengebundene Faktoren, die darauf Einfluss haben. Im einzelnen werden Ergebnisse zu folgenden Aspekten präsentiert: Regelung der Informationsorganisation; Anreicherung unstrukturierter Informationen mit Metadaten; Probleme bei der Suche nach unternehmensinternen Informationen; täglicher Zeitaufwand für die Suche; vorhandene, wünschenswerte und benötigte Suchfunktionalitäten; Zufriedenheit mit der Suche und der Informationsorganisation Unternehmen.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 19:00:02
    Source
    Wissen - Wissenschaft - Organisation: Proceedings der 12. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Bonn, 19. bis 21. Oktober 2009. Hrsg.: H.P. Ohly
  4. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.04 
    0.03944498 = product of:
  0.118334934 = sum of:
    0.118334934 = product of:
      0.3550048 = sum of:
        0.3550048 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3550048 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3789965 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04470347 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  5. Hilberer, T.: Numerus currens und iPod : die Organisation von Information mittels Metadaten und die Aufgabe der Bibliotheken im digitalen Zeitalter oder Die Kraft der digitalen Ordnung (2011) 0.04 
    0.03896099 = product of:
  0.116882965 = sum of:
    0.116882965 = sum of:
      0.07448605 = weight(_text_:2009 in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07448605 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.35897845 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
      0.042396918 = weight(_text_:22 in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042396918 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  6. Stalberg, E.; Cronin, C.: Assessing the cost and value of bibliographic control (2011) 0.04 
    0.03896099 = product of:
  0.116882965 = sum of:
    0.116882965 = sum of:
      0.07448605 = weight(_text_:2009 in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07448605 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.35897845 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
      0.042396918 = weight(_text_:22 in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042396918 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    In June 2009, the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Heads of Technical Services in Large Research Libraries Interest Group established the Task Force on Cost/Value Assessment of Bibliographic Control to address recommendation 5.1.1.1 of On the Record: Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, which focused on developing measures for costs, benefits, and value of bibliographic control. This paper outlines results of that task force's efforts to develop and articulate metrics for evaluating the cost and value of cataloging activities specifically, and offers some next steps that the community could take to further the profession's collective understanding of the costs and values associated with bibliographic control.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011) 0.03 
    0.033395134 = product of:
  0.100185394 = sum of:
    0.100185394 = sum of:
      0.06384518 = weight(_text_:2009 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06384518 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.3076958 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
      0.036340214 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036340214 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  8. Blackman, C.; Moore, E.R.; Seikel, M.; Smith, M.: WorldCat and SkyRiver (2014) 0.03 
    0.033395134 = product of:
  0.100185394 = sum of:
    0.100185394 = sum of:
      0.06384518 = weight(_text_:2009 in 2602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06384518 = score(doc=2602,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.3076958 = fieldWeight in 2602, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2602)
      0.036340214 = weight(_text_:22 in 2602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036340214 = score(doc=2602,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2602, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2602)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    In 2009, a new company, SkyRiver, began offering bibliographic utility services to libraries in direct competition to OCLC's WorldCat. This study examines the differences between the two databases in terms of hit rates, total number of records found for each title in the sample, number of non-English language records, and the presence and completeness of several elements in the most-held bibliographic record for each title. While this study discovered that the two databases had virtually the same hit rates and record fullness for the sample used-with encoding levels as the sole exception-the study results do indicate meaningful differences in the number of duplicate records and non-English-language records available in each database for recently published scholarly monographs.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Frodl, C; Scheven, E.; Werner, C.: Veröffentlichung der 6. RSWK-Ergänzungslieferung (2010) 0.03 
    0.03264963 = product of:
  0.09794888 = sum of:
    0.09794888 = sum of:
      0.07372207 = weight(_text_:2009 in 4048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07372207 = score(doc=4048,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.35529655 = fieldWeight in 4048, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4048)
      0.02422681 = weight(_text_:22 in 4048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02422681 = score(doc=4048,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4048, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4048)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    § 14 regelt die Anordnung der Schlagwörter in einer Schlagwortfolge. Sie wurde auf eine formale Reihenfolge vereinfacht; bei Zusammentreffen von mehreren Schlagwörtern der gleichen Kategorie soll eine sinnvolle Reihenfolge gewählt werden. § 15 macht grundsätzliche Aussagen zur Anzeige und zum Retrieval von Schlagwortfolgen. Außerdem wurde § 106 dahingehend geändert, dass in Zukunft der Homonymenzusatz bei Personen nur eine der SWD zu entnehmende Bezeichnung sein soll; die Unterscheidung von engen und weiten Berufsbezeichnungen mit einer zugelassenen Liste wird aufgegeben. In § 731 wird hinsichtlich der Kirchenbauten präzisiert, welche Bezeichnungen als Individualnamen gelten. Die Expertengruppe Sacherschließung hat die Änderungen an den RSWK auf ihren Sitzungen am 20. April 2009 bzw. 16. November 2009 beschlossen. Der Standardisierungsausschuss hat auf seiner 18. Sitzung am 25. November 2009 einer Veröffentlichung und Inkraftsetzung zum 1. Januar 2010 zugestimmt. Die Anpassungen des Regelwerks, die sich aus den geänderten §§ 13-15 ergeben, sollen Anfang 2010 veröffentlicht werden. Die Papierausgabe des Grundwerks in der 3., überarbeiteten und erweiterten Auflage sowie die 1. bis 4. Ergänzungslieferung der "Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog" können Sie beziehen über die: Deutsche Nationalbibliothek, Bibliografische Dienste Adickesallee 1, 60322 Frankfurt am Main Fax: 069/1525-1636, E-Mail: c.junker@d-nb.de Die 5. Ergänzungslieferung steht in elektronischer Form unter der oben genannten Webseite zur Verfügung.
    Date
    22. 1.2010 15:12:33
  10. Hajibayova, L.; Jacob, E.K.: Investigation of levels of abstraction in user-generated tagging vocabularies : a case of wild or tamed categorization? (2014) 0.03 
    0.032010563 = product of:
  0.09603168 = sum of:
    0.09603168 = sum of:
      0.053204324 = weight(_text_:2009 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053204324 = score(doc=1451,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.2564132 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
      0.042827353 = weight(_text_:22 in 1451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042827353 = score(doc=1451,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1451, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1451)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Previous studies of user-generated vocabularies (e.g., Golder & Huberman, 2006; Munk & Mork, 2007b; Yoon, 2009) have proposed that a primary source of tag agreement across users is due to wide-spread use of tags at the basic level of abstraction. However, an investigation of levels of abstraction in user-generated tagging vocabularies did not support this notion. This study analyzed approximately 8000 tags generated by 40 subjects. Analysis of 7617 tags assigned to 36 online resources representing four content categories (TOOL, FRUIT, CLOTHING, VEHICLE) and three resource genres (news article, blog, ecommerce) did not find statistically significant preferences in the assignment of tags at the superordinate, subordinate or basic levels of abstraction. Within the framework of Heidegger's (1953/1996) notion of handiness , observed variations in the preferred level of abstraction are both natural and phenomenological in that perception and understanding -- and thus the meaning of "things" -- arise out of the individual's contextualized experiences of engaging with objects. Operationalization of superordinate, subordinate and basic levels of abstraction using Heidegger's notion of handiness may be able to account for differences in the everyday experiences and activities of taggers, thereby leading to a better understanding of user-generated tagging vocabularies.
    Date
    5. 9.2014 16:22:27
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  11. Bertram, J.: Informationen verzweifelt gesucht : Enterprise Search in österreichischen Großunternehmen (2011) 0.03 
    0.032010563 = product of:
  0.09603168 = sum of:
    0.09603168 = sum of:
      0.053204324 = weight(_text_:2009 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053204324 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.2564132 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
      0.042827353 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042827353 = score(doc=2657,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Die Arbeit geht dem Status quo der unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Großunternehmen nach und beleuchtet Faktoren, die darauf Einfluss haben. Aus der Analyse des Ist-Zustands wird der Bedarf an Enterprise-Search-Software abgeleitet und es werden Rahmenbedingungen für deren erfolgreiche Einführung skizziert. Die Untersuchung stützt sich auf eine im Jahr 2009 durchgeführte Onlinebefragung von 469 österreichischen Großunternehmen (Rücklauf 22 %) und daran anschließende Leitfadeninterviews mit zwölf Teilnehmern der Onlinebefragung. Der theoretische Teil verortet die Arbeit im Kontext des Informations- und Wissensmanagements. Der Fokus liegt auf dem Ansatz der Enterprise Search, ihrer Abgrenzung gegenüber der Suche im Internet und ihrem Leistungsspektrum. Im empirischen Teil wird zunächst aufgezeigt, wie die Unternehmen ihre Informationen organisieren und welche Probleme dabei auftreten. Es folgt eine Analyse des Status quo der Informati-onssuche im Unternehmen. Abschließend werden Bekanntheit und Einsatz von Enterprise-Search-Software in der Zielgruppe untersucht sowie für die Einführung dieser Software nötige Rahmenbedingungen benannt. Defizite machen die Befragten insbesondere im Hinblick auf die übergreifende Suche im Unternehmen und die Suche nach Kompetenzträgern aus. Hier werden Lücken im Wissensmanagement offenbar. 29 % der Respondenten der Onlinebefragung geben zu-dem an, dass es in ihren Unternehmen gelegentlich bis häufig zu Fehlentscheidungen infolge defizitärer Informationslagen kommt. Enterprise-Search-Software kommt in 17 % der Unternehmen, die sich an der Onlinebefragung beteiligten, zum Einsatz. Die durch Enterprise-Search-Software bewirkten Veränderungen werden grundsätzlich posi-tiv beurteilt. Alles in allem zeigen die Ergebnisse, dass Enterprise-Search-Strategien nur Erfolg haben können, wenn man sie in umfassende Maßnahmen des Informations- und Wissensmanagements einbettet.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 20:40:31
  12. Shah, T.A.; Gul, S.; Gaur, R.C.: Authors self-citation behaviour in the field of Library and Information Science (2015) 0.03 
    0.028568424 = product of:
  0.08570527 = sum of:
    0.08570527 = sum of:
      0.064506814 = weight(_text_:2009 in 2597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.064506814 = score(doc=2597,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.31088448 = fieldWeight in 2597, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2597)
      0.021198459 = weight(_text_:22 in 2597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.021198459 = score(doc=2597,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2597, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2597)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyse the author self-citation behavior in the field of Library and Information Science. Various factors governing the author self-citation behavior have also been studied. Design/methodology/approach The 2012 edition of Social Science Citation Index was consulted for the selection of LIS journals. Under the subject heading "Information Science and Library Science" there were 84 journals and out of these 12 journals were selected for the study based on systematic sampling. The study was confined to original research and review articles that were published in select journals in the year 2009. The main reason to choose 2009 was to get at least five years (2009-2013) citation data from Web of Science Core Collection (excluding Book Citation Index) and SciELO Citation Index. A citation was treated as self-citation whenever one of the authors of citing and cited paper was common, i.e., the set of co-authors of the citing paper and that of the cited one are not disjoint. To minimize the risk of homonyms, spelling variances and misspelling in authors' names, the authors compared full author names in citing and cited articles. Findings A positive correlation between number of authors and total number of citations exists with no correlation between number of authors and number/share of self-citations, i.e., self-citations are not affected by the number of co-authors in a paper. Articles which are produced in collaboration attract more self-citations than articles produced by only one author. There is no statistically significant variation in citations counts (total and self-citations) in works that are result of different types of collaboration. A strong and statistically significant positive correlation exists between total citation count and frequency of self-citations. No relation could be ascertained between total citation count and proportion of self-citations. Authors tend to cite more of their recent works than the work of other authors. Total citation count and number of self-citations are positively correlated with the impact factor of source publication and correlation coefficient for total citations is much higher than that for self-citations. A negative correlation exhibits between impact factor and the share of self-citations. Of particular note is that the correlation in all the cases is of weak nature. Research limitations/implications The research provides an understanding of the author self-citations in the field of LIS. readers are encouraged to further the study by taking into account large sample, tracing citations also from Book Citation Index (WoS) and comparing results with other allied subjects so as to validate the robustness of the findings of this study. Originality/value Readers are encouraged to further the study by taking into account large sample, tracing citations also from Book Citation Index (WoS) and comparing results with other allied subjects so as to validate the robustness of the findings of this study.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  13. McIlwaine, I.C.: Brian Vickery : 11th September 1918-17 th October 2009 (2010) 0.03 
    0.02782928 = product of:
  0.08348784 = sum of:
    0.08348784 = sum of:
      0.053204324 = weight(_text_:2009 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053204324 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.2564132 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
      0.030283514 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030283514 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    22. 7.2010 19:32:06
  14. Lercher, A.: Efficiency of scientific communication : a survey of world science (2010) 0.03 
    0.02782928 = product of:
  0.08348784 = sum of:
    0.08348784 = sum of:
      0.053204324 = weight(_text_:2009 in 3997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053204324 = score(doc=3997,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.2564132 = fieldWeight in 3997, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3997)
      0.030283514 = weight(_text_:22 in 3997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030283514 = score(doc=3997,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3997, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3997)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The aim of this study was to measure the efficiency of the system by which scientists worldwide communicate results to each other, providing one measure of the degree to which the system, including all media, functions well. A randomly selected and representative sample of 246 active research scientists worldwide was surveyed. The main measure was the reported rate of "late finds": scientific literature that would have been useful to scientists' projects if it had been found at the beginning of these projects. The main result was that 46% of the sample reported late finds (±6.25%, p0.05). Among respondents from European Union countries or other countries classified as "high income" by the World Bank, 42% reported late finds. Among respondents from low- and middle-income countries, 56% reported late finds. The 42% rate in high-income countries in 2009 can be compared with results of earlier surveys by Martyn (1964a, b, 1987). These earlier surveys found a rate of 22% late finds in 1963-1964 and a rate of 27% in 1985-1986. Respondents were also queried about search habits, but this study failed to support any explanations for this increase in the rate of late finds. This study also permits a crude estimate of the cost in time and money of the increase in late finds.
  15. Dunsire, G.; Nicholson, D.: Signposting the crossroads : terminology Web services and classification-based interoperability (2010) 0.03 
    0.02782928 = product of:
  0.08348784 = sum of:
    0.08348784 = sum of:
      0.053204324 = weight(_text_:2009 in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053204324 = score(doc=4066,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.2564132 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
      0.030283514 = weight(_text_:22 in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030283514 = score(doc=4066,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    Teil von: Papers from Classification at a Crossroads: Multiple Directions to Usability: International UDC Seminar 2009-Part 2
    Date
    6. 1.2011 19:22:48
  16. Hauer, M.: Collaborative Catalog Enrichment : Digitalisierung und Information Retrieval (2011) 0.03 
    0.02782928 = product of:
  0.08348784 = sum of:
    0.08348784 = sum of:
      0.053204324 = weight(_text_:2009 in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053204324 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.2564132 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
      0.030283514 = weight(_text_:22 in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030283514 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  17. Metzendorf, M.-I.: ¬Ein Wiki als internes Wissensmanagementtool der Bibliothek : Vorbedingungen und Erfahrungen (2011) 0.03 
    0.02782928 = product of:
  0.08348784 = sum of:
    0.08348784 = sum of:
      0.053204324 = weight(_text_:2009 in 163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053204324 = score(doc=163,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.2564132 = fieldWeight in 163, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=163)
      0.030283514 = weight(_text_:22 in 163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030283514 = score(doc=163,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 163, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=163)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  18. Kumbhar, R.: Library classification trends in the 21st century (2012) 0.03 
    0.02782928 = product of:
  0.08348784 = sum of:
    0.08348784 = sum of:
      0.053204324 = weight(_text_:2009 in 736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053204324 = score(doc=736,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.2564132 = fieldWeight in 736, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=736)
      0.030283514 = weight(_text_:22 in 736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030283514 = score(doc=736,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 736, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=736)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This book would serve as a good introductory textbook for a library science student or as a reference work on the types of classification currently in use. College and Research Libraries - covers all aspects of library classification - it is the only book that reviews literature published over a decade's time span (1999-2009) - well thought chapterization which is in tune with the LIS and classification curriculum - useful reference tool for researchers in classification - a valuable contribution to the bibliographic control of classification literature Library Classification Trends in the 21st Century traces development in and around library classification as reported in literature published in the first decade of the 21st century. It reviews literature published on various aspects of library classification, including modern applications of classification such as internet resource discovery, automatic book classification, text categorization, modern manifestations of classification such as taxonomies, folksonomies and ontologies and interoperable systems enabling crosswalk. The book also features classification education and an exploration of relevant topics.
    Date
    22. 2.2013 12:23:55
  19. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.03 
    0.027611485 = product of:
  0.08283445 = sum of:
    0.08283445 = product of:
      0.24850336 = sum of:
        0.24850336 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24850336 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3789965 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04470347 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  20. Plieninger, J.: Informationskompetenz online vermitteln : eTeaching für OPLs (2011) 0.03 
    0.025608448 = product of:
  0.07682534 = sum of:
    0.07682534 = sum of:
      0.042563457 = weight(_text_:2009 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042563457 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20749448 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.20513055 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.6415744 = idf(docFreq=1158, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
      0.034261886 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034261886 = score(doc=166,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15654393 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04470347 = queryNorm
          0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    29. 5.2012 14:20:22
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a

Authors

Languages

  • e 562
  • d 262
  • a 1
  • hu 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 725
  • el 68
  • m 54
  • s 18
  • x 15
  • r 7
  • b 5
  • i 1
  • l 1
  • n 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications