Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.014416355 = product of:
  0.043249063 = sum of:
    0.043249063 = product of:
      0.08649813 = sum of:
        0.08649813 = weight(_text_:2007 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08649813 = score(doc=2622,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1751764 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038802754 = queryNorm
            0.49377728 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

In this article, we analyze the citations to articles published in 11 biological and medical journals from 2003 to 2007 that employ author-choice open-access models. Controlling for known explanatory predictors of citations, only 2 of the 11 journals show positive and significant open-access effects. Analyzing all journals together, we report a small but significant increase in article citations of 17%. In addition, there is strong evidence to suggest that the open-access advantage is declining by about 7% per year, from 32% in 2004 to 11% in 2007.

0.0035366397 = product of:
  0.010609919 = sum of:
    0.010609919 = product of:
      0.031829756 = sum of:
        0.031829756 = weight(_text_:29 in 5768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031829756 = score(doc=5768,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13649596 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038802754 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5768, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5768)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

29. 9.2001 14:01:09