Search (1302 results, page 1 of 66)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010) 0.05
    0.051448103 = product of:
      0.07717215 = sum of:
        0.026212888 = product of:
          0.052425776 = sum of:
            0.052425776 = weight(_text_:2007 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052425776 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1751764 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.2992742 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.050959267 = product of:
          0.0764389 = sum of:
            0.031829756 = weight(_text_:29 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031829756 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13649596 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
            0.04460914 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04460914 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13588063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
    Date
    22. 1.2010 15:06:54
  2. Chu, H.: Factors affecting relevance judgment : a report from TREC Legal track (2011) 0.05
    0.04869492 = product of:
      0.07304238 = sum of:
        0.03783505 = product of:
          0.0756701 = sum of:
            0.0756701 = weight(_text_:2007 in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0756701 = score(doc=4540,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1751764 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.43196514 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.035207324 = product of:
          0.052810986 = sum of:
            0.026524797 = weight(_text_:29 in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026524797 = score(doc=4540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13649596 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
            0.026286189 = weight(_text_:22 in 4540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026286189 = score(doc=4540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13588063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4540)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This study intends to identify factors that affect relevance judgment of retrieved information as part of the 2007 TREC Legal track interactive task. Design/methodology/approach - Data were gathered and analyzed from the participants of the 2007 TREC Legal track interactive task using a questionnaire which includes not only a list of 80 relevance factors identified in prior research, but also a space for expressing their thoughts on relevance judgment in the process. Findings - This study finds that topicality remains a primary criterion, out of various options, for determining relevance, while specificity of the search request, task, or retrieved results also helps greatly in relevance judgment. Research limitations/implications - Relevance research should focus on the topicality and specificity of what is being evaluated as well as conducted in real environments. Practical implications - If multiple relevance factors are presented to assessors, the total number in a list should be below ten to take account of the limited processing capacity of human beings' short-term memory. Otherwise, the assessors might either completely ignore or inadequately consider some of the relevance factors when making judgment decisions. Originality/value - This study presents a method for reducing the artificiality of relevance research design, an apparent limitation in many related studies. Specifically, relevance judgment was made in this research as part of the 2007 TREC Legal track interactive task rather than a study devised for the sake of it. The assessors also served as searchers so that their searching experience would facilitate their subsequent relevance judgments.
    Date
    12. 7.2011 18:29:22
  3. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.04
    0.041086044 = product of:
      0.12325813 = sum of:
        0.12325813 = product of:
          0.36977437 = sum of:
            0.36977437 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.36977437 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3289702 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  4. Ohly, H.P.: Wissenskommunikation und -organisation : Quo vadis? (2010) 0.04
    0.037010636 = product of:
      0.055515952 = sum of:
        0.043249063 = product of:
          0.08649813 = sum of:
            0.08649813 = weight(_text_:2007 in 3727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08649813 = score(doc=3727,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1751764 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.49377728 = fieldWeight in 3727, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3727)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012266888 = product of:
          0.036800664 = sum of:
            0.036800664 = weight(_text_:22 in 3727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036800664 = score(doc=3727,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13588063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3727, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3727)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Dieses Papier diskutiert die allgemeinen Entwicklungen auf dem Gebiet der Wissenskommunikation. Bereits die Betrachtung der informations- und wissensorganisatorischen Techniken lassen einige Folgerungen für den künftig zu erwartenden Wissensaustausch und seine Formalisierung ziehen. Auch wurden künftige Aspekte der Wissensorganisation und -kommunikation im Rahmen von Panels bei der Deutschen ISKO-Konferenz 2006 in Wien und in 2007 auf der IKONE-Konferenz in Bangalore sowie bei der WissKom 2007 in Jülich diskutiert. Hieraus und aus Betrachtungen zu den neuen medialen Techniken werden Folgerungen für zu erwartende und zu empfehlende künftige Entwicklungen gezogen.
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  5. Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010) 0.04
    0.037010636 = product of:
      0.055515952 = sum of:
        0.043249063 = product of:
          0.08649813 = sum of:
            0.08649813 = weight(_text_:2007 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08649813 = score(doc=4309,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1751764 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.49377728 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012266888 = product of:
          0.036800664 = sum of:
            0.036800664 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036800664 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13588063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.03
    0.03423837 = product of:
      0.102715105 = sum of:
        0.102715105 = product of:
          0.3081453 = sum of:
            0.3081453 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3081453 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3289702 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  7. Song, M.; Kim, S.Y.; Zhang, G.; Ding, Y.; Chambers, T.: Productivity and influence in bioinformatics : a bibliometric analysis using PubMed central (2014) 0.03
    0.03178703 = product of:
      0.047680542 = sum of:
        0.037070625 = product of:
          0.07414125 = sum of:
            0.07414125 = weight(_text_:2007 in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07414125 = score(doc=1202,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1751764 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.42323765 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.010609919 = product of:
          0.031829756 = sum of:
            0.031829756 = weight(_text_:29 in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031829756 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13649596 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Bioinformatics is a fast-growing field based on the optimal use of "big data" gathered in genomic, proteomics, and functional genomics research. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive and in-depth bibliometric analysis of the field of bioinformatics by extracting citation data from PubMed Central full-text. Citation data for the period 2000 to 2011, comprising 20,869 papers with 546,245 citations, was used to evaluate the productivity and influence of this emerging field. Four measures were used to identify productivity; most productive authors, most productive countries, most productive organizations, and most popular subject terms. Research impact was analyzed based on the measures of most cited papers, most cited authors, emerging stars, and leading organizations. Results show the overall trends between the periods 2000 to 2003 and 2004 to 2007 were dissimilar, while trends between the periods 2004 to 2007 and 2008 to 2011 were similar. In addition, the field of bioinformatics has undergone a significant shift, co-evolving with other biomedical disciplines.
    Date
    29. 1.2014 16:40:41
  8. Bates, M.J.: ¬The nature of browsing (2019) 0.03
    0.028639961 = product of:
      0.04295994 = sum of:
        0.030581702 = product of:
          0.061163403 = sum of:
            0.061163403 = weight(_text_:2007 in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061163403 = score(doc=2265,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1751764 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.34915322 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012378238 = product of:
          0.037134714 = sum of:
            0.037134714 = weight(_text_:29 in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037134714 = score(doc=2265,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13649596 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The recent article by McKay et al. on browsing (2019) provides a valuable addition to the empirical literature of information science on this topic, and I read the descriptions of the various browsing cases with interest. However, the authors refer to my article on browsing (Bates, 2007) in ways that do not make sense to me and which do not at all conform to what I actually said.
    Date
    25. 6.2019 11:13:29
  9. Petras, V.: Heterogenitätsbehandlung und Terminology Mapping durch Crosskonkordanzen : eine Fallstudie (2010) 0.03
    0.028565727 = product of:
      0.04284859 = sum of:
        0.030581702 = product of:
          0.061163403 = sum of:
            0.061163403 = weight(_text_:2007 in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061163403 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1751764 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.34915322 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012266888 = product of:
          0.036800664 = sum of:
            0.036800664 = weight(_text_:22 in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036800664 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13588063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Das BMBF hat bis Ende 2007 ein Projekt gefördert, dessen Aufgabe es war, die Erstellung und das Management von Crosskonkordanzen zwischen kontrollierten Vokabularen (Thesauri, Klassifikationen, Deskriptorenlisten) zu organisieren. In drei Jahren wurden 64 Crosskonkordanzen mit mehr als 500.000 Relationen zwischen kontrollierten Vokabularen aus den Sozialwissenschaften und anderen Fachgebieten umgesetzt. In der Schlussphase des Projekts wurde eine umfangreiche Evaluation durchgeführt, die die Effektivität der Crosskonkordanzen in unterschiedlichen Informationssystemen testen sollte. Der Artikel berichtet über die Anwendungsmöglichkeiten der Heterogenitätsbehandlung durch Crosskonkordanzen und die Ergebnisse der umfangreichen Analysen.
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  10. Campanario, J.M.: Large increases and decreases in journal impact factors in only one year : the effect of journal self-citations (2011) 0.03
    0.028565727 = product of:
      0.04284859 = sum of:
        0.030581702 = product of:
          0.061163403 = sum of:
            0.061163403 = weight(_text_:2007 in 4187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061163403 = score(doc=4187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1751764 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.34915322 = fieldWeight in 4187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4187)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012266888 = product of:
          0.036800664 = sum of:
            0.036800664 = weight(_text_:22 in 4187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036800664 = score(doc=4187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13588063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4187)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    I studied the factors (citations, self-citations, and number of articles) that influenced large changes in only 1 year in the impact factors (IFs) of journals. A set of 360 instances of journals with large increases or decreases in their IFs from a given year to the following was selected from journals in the Journal Citation Reports from 1998 to 2007 (40 journals each year). The main factor influencing large changes was the change in the number of citations. About 54% of the increases and 42% of the decreases in the journal IFs were associated with changes in the journal self-citations.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 12:53:00
  11. Badia, A.: Data, information, knowledge : an information science analysis (2014) 0.03
    0.028565727 = product of:
      0.04284859 = sum of:
        0.030581702 = product of:
          0.061163403 = sum of:
            0.061163403 = weight(_text_:2007 in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061163403 = score(doc=1296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1751764 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.34915322 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012266888 = product of:
          0.036800664 = sum of:
            0.036800664 = weight(_text_:22 in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036800664 = score(doc=1296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13588063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    I analyze the text of an article that appeared in this journal in 2007 that published the results of a questionnaire in which a number of experts were asked to define the concepts of data, information, and knowledge. I apply standard information retrieval techniques to build a list of the most frequent terms in each set of definitions. I then apply information extraction techniques to analyze how the top terms are used in the definitions. As a result, I draw data-driven conclusions about the aggregate opinion of the experts. I contrast this with the original analysis of the data to provide readers with an alternative viewpoint on what the data tell us.
    Date
    16. 6.2014 19:22:57
  12. Deisseroth, K.: Lichtschalter im Gehirn (2011) 0.03
    0.028165858 = product of:
      0.08449757 = sum of:
        0.08449757 = product of:
          0.12674636 = sum of:
            0.06365951 = weight(_text_:29 in 4248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06365951 = score(doc=4248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13649596 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 4248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4248)
            0.063086845 = weight(_text_:22 in 4248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063086845 = score(doc=4248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13588063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4248)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2011, H.2, S.22-29
  13. Sauperl, S.A.: UDC as a standardisation method for providing titles of documents (2015) 0.03
    0.028165858 = product of:
      0.08449757 = sum of:
        0.08449757 = product of:
          0.12674636 = sum of:
            0.06365951 = weight(_text_:29 in 2302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06365951 = score(doc=2302,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13649596 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 2302, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2302)
            0.063086845 = weight(_text_:22 in 2302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063086845 = score(doc=2302,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13588063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2302, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2302)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10.11.2015 10:22:31
    Source
    Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
  14. Viti, E.: My first ten years : nuovo soggettario growing, development and integration with other knowledge organization systems (2017) 0.03
    0.026436165 = product of:
      0.039654247 = sum of:
        0.030892184 = product of:
          0.061784368 = sum of:
            0.061784368 = weight(_text_:2007 in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061784368 = score(doc=4143,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1751764 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.35269803 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.008762063 = product of:
          0.026286189 = sum of:
            0.026286189 = weight(_text_:22 in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026286189 = score(doc=4143,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13588063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Nuovo Soggettario is a subject indexing system edited by the Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale di Firenze. It was presented to librarians from across Italy on 8 February 2007 in Florence as a new edition of the Soggettario (1956), and it has become the official Italian subject indexing tool. This system is made up of two individual and interactive components: the general thesaurus, accessible on the web since 2007 and the rules of a conventional syntax for the construction of subject strings. The Nuovo soggettario thesaurus has grown significantly in terms of terminology and connections with other knowledge organization tools (e.g., encyclopedias, dictionaries, resources of archives and museums, and other information data sets), offering the users the possibility to browse through documents, books, objects, photographs, etc. The conversion of the Nuovo soggettario thesaurus into formats suitable for the semantic web and linked data world improves its function as an interlinking hub for direct searching and for organizing content by different professional communities. Thanks to structured data and the SKOS format, the Nuovo soggettario thesaurus is published on the Data Hub platform, thus giving broad visibility to the BNCF and its precious patrimony.
    Content
    Beitrag eines Special Issue: ISKO-Italy: 8' Incontro ISKO Italia, Università di Bologna, 22 maggio 2017, Bologna, Italia.
  15. Weissenberger, L.K.: Traditional musics and ethical considerations of knowledge and documentation processes (2015) 0.02
    0.024548538 = product of:
      0.036822807 = sum of:
        0.026212888 = product of:
          0.052425776 = sum of:
            0.052425776 = weight(_text_:2007 in 2362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052425776 = score(doc=2362,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1751764 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.2992742 = fieldWeight in 2362, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2362)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.010609919 = product of:
          0.031829756 = sum of:
            0.031829756 = weight(_text_:29 in 2362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031829756 = score(doc=2362,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13649596 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2362, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2362)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes ethical considerations surrounding traditional music knowledge and documents, both from the author's experiences as apprentice to a renowned Irish fiddler, and from other music practitioners. Frohmann's (2004) informativeness of documents, Turner's (2007) oral documents, and writings of Briet and Otlet provide the theoretical underpinnings necessary to argue for and describe alternative documents: memory, metaphor, and storytelling. Examples of these alternative types of documents from the Irish music tradition and other world music traditions provide a basis for examining knowledge and documentation practices in traditional musics. Additional challenges for knowledge organization and traditional musics are related to attribution and ownership, as well as secrecy and privacy. What might be termed an "ethics of evidence" unites these traditional music knowledge and documentation issues into a single challenge for knowledge organization.
    Content
    Beitrag anlässlich: Proceedings of the 3rd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Knowledge Organization, May 28-29, 2015, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_42_2015_5.
  16. Geißler, S.: Maschinelles Lernen und NLP : Reif für die industrielle Anwendung! (2019) 0.02
    0.024548538 = product of:
      0.036822807 = sum of:
        0.026212888 = product of:
          0.052425776 = sum of:
            0.052425776 = weight(_text_:2007 in 3547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052425776 = score(doc=3547,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1751764 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.2992742 = fieldWeight in 3547, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3547)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.010609919 = product of:
          0.031829756 = sum of:
            0.031829756 = weight(_text_:29 in 3547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031829756 = score(doc=3547,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13649596 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3547, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3547)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1515/iwp-2019-2007.
    Date
    2. 9.2019 19:29:24
  17. Ridenour, L.: Boundary objects : measuring gaps and overlap between research areas (2016) 0.02
    0.024484908 = product of:
      0.03672736 = sum of:
        0.026212888 = product of:
          0.052425776 = sum of:
            0.052425776 = weight(_text_:2007 in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052425776 = score(doc=2835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1751764 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.2992742 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0105144745 = product of:
          0.031543422 = sum of:
            0.031543422 = weight(_text_:22 in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031543422 = score(doc=2835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13588063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of this paper is to develop methodology to determine conceptual overlap between research areas. It investigates patterns of terminology usage in scientific abstracts as boundary objects between research specialties. Research specialties were determined by high-level classifications assigned by Thomson Reuters in their Essential Science Indicators file, which provided a strictly hierarchical classification of journals into 22 categories. Results from the query "network theory" were downloaded from the Web of Science. From this file, two top-level groups, economics and social sciences, were selected and topically analyzed to provide a baseline of similarity on which to run an informetric analysis. The Places & Spaces Map of Science (Klavans and Boyack 2007) was used to determine the proximity of disciplines to one another in order to select the two disciplines use in the analysis. Groups analyzed share common theories and goals; however, groups used different language to describe their research. It was found that 61% of term words were shared between the two groups.
  18. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.02
    0.02396686 = product of:
      0.07190058 = sum of:
        0.07190058 = product of:
          0.21570173 = sum of:
            0.21570173 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21570173 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3289702 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  19. Raichle, M.E.: Im Kopf herrscht niemals Ruhe (2010) 0.02
    0.02347155 = product of:
      0.07041465 = sum of:
        0.07041465 = product of:
          0.10562197 = sum of:
            0.053049594 = weight(_text_:29 in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053049594 = score(doc=3679,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13649596 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3679)
            0.052572377 = weight(_text_:22 in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052572377 = score(doc=3679,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13588063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3679)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    31.12.1996 19:29:41
    20. 6.2010 9:22:04
  20. Ermert, A.: Terminologie - Bedeutung, Erarbeitung, professionelle Strukturierung und Management : Der 13. Deutsche Terminologietag vom 19. bis 21. April 2012 in Heidelberg (2012) 0.02
    0.02347155 = product of:
      0.07041465 = sum of:
        0.07041465 = product of:
          0.10562197 = sum of:
            0.053049594 = weight(_text_:29 in 327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053049594 = score(doc=327,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13649596 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 327, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=327)
            0.052572377 = weight(_text_:22 in 327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052572377 = score(doc=327,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13588063 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.038802754 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 327, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=327)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:37:29

Authors

Languages

  • e 960
  • d 330
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 1148
  • el 111
  • m 88
  • s 31
  • x 21
  • r 11
  • b 5
  • i 2
  • l 1
  • p 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications