Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  1. Spink, A.; Wolfram, D.; Jansen, B.J.; Saracevic, T.: Searching the Web : the public and their queries (2001) 0.02
    0.017386068 = product of:
      0.034772135 = sum of:
        0.034772135 = product of:
          0.06954427 = sum of:
            0.06954427 = weight(_text_:1997 in 6980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06954427 = score(doc=6980,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.42470744 = fieldWeight in 6980, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6980)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In previous articles, we reported the state of Web searching in 1997 (Jansen, Spink, & Saracevic, 2000) and in 1999 (Spink, Wolfram, Jansen, & Saracevic, 2001). Such snapshot studies and statistics on Web use appear regularly (OCLC, 1999), but provide little information about Web searching trends. In this article, we compare and contrast results from our two previous studies of Excite queries' data sets, each containing over 1 million queries submitted by over 200,000 Excite users collected on 16 September 1997 and 20 December 1999. We examine how public Web searching changing during that 2-year time period. As Table 1 shows, the overall structure of Web queries in some areas did not change, while in others we see change from 1997 to 1999. Our comparison shows how Web searching changed incrementally and also dramatically. We see some moves toward greater simplicity, including shorter queries (i.e., fewer terms) and shorter sessions (i.e., fewer queries per user), with little modification (addition or deletion) of terms in subsequent queries. The trend toward shorter queries suggests that Web information content should target specific terms in order to reach Web users. Another trend was to view fewer pages of results per query. Most Excite users examined only one page of results per query, since an Excite results page contains ten ranked Web sites. Were users satisfied with the results and did not need to view more pages? It appears that the public continues to have a low tolerance of wading through retrieved sites. This decline in interactivity levels is a disturbing finding for the future of Web searching. Queries that included Boolean operators were in the minority, but the percentage increased between the two time periods. Most Boolean use involved the AND operator with many mistakes. The use of relevance feedback almost doubled from 1997 to 1999, but overall use was still small. An unusually large number of terms were used with low frequency, such as personal names, spelling errors, non-English words, and Web-specific terms, such as URLs. Web query vocabulary contains more words than found in large English texts in general. The public language of Web queries has its own and unique characteristics. How did Web searching topics change from 1997 to 1999? We classified a random sample of 2,414 queries from 1997 and 2,539 queries from 1999 into 11 categories (Table 2). From 1997 to 1999, Web searching shifted from entertainment, recreation and sex, and pornography, preferences to e-commerce-related topics under commerce, travel, employment, and economy. This shift coincided with changes in information distribution on the publicly indexed Web.
  2. Wang, P.; Berry, M.W.; Yang, Y.: Mining longitudinal Web queries : trends and patterns (2003) 0.01
    0.011499803 = product of:
      0.022999605 = sum of:
        0.022999605 = product of:
          0.04599921 = sum of:
            0.04599921 = weight(_text_:1997 in 6561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04599921 = score(doc=6561,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.28091756 = fieldWeight in 6561, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6561)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This project analyzed 541,920 user queries submitted to and executed in an academic Website during a four-year period (May 1997 to May 2001) using a relational database. The purpose of the study is three-fold: (1) to understand Web users' query behavior; (2) to identify problems encountered by these Web users; (3) to develop appropriate techniques for optimization of query analysis and mining. The linguistic analyses focus an query structures, lexicon, and word associations using statistical measures such as Zipf distribution and mutual information. A data model with finest granularity is used for data storage and iterative analyses. Patterns and trends of querying behavior are identified and compared with previous studies.
  3. Höchstötter, N.: Suchverhalten im Web : Erhebung, Analyse und Möglichkeiten (2007) 0.01
    0.009856974 = product of:
      0.019713948 = sum of:
        0.019713948 = product of:
          0.039427895 = sum of:
            0.039427895 = weight(_text_:1997 in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039427895 = score(doc=281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.2407865 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Suchmaschinen stellen eine wichtige Möglichkeit dar, um neue Informationen oder Webseiten im Internet zu finden. Das Online-Marketing wurde dadurch verstärkt auf das Suchmaschinen-Marketing ausgerichtet, bei dem vor allem darauf geachtet wird, dass man in Suchmaschinen gut sichtbar ist. Bei der effizienten Planung von Marketing-Aktionen ist es deshalb wichtig, nicht nur profunde Kenntnisse über die Funktionsweise von Suchmaschinen zu haben, sondern auch das Suchverhalten von Suchmaschinennutzern zu untersuchen und die Ergebnisse geeignet umzusetzen. In diesem Beitrag wird auf die Erforschung des Suchverhaltens im Web und auf die Interaktion von Menschen mit Suchmaschinen ab 1997 eingegangen. In erster Linie werden verschiedene Erhebungsmethoden erklärt und Analysen vorgestellt. Es wird auch diskutiert, wie die Ergebnisse umgesetzt werden können, um die Auffindbarkeit von Webseiten zu verbessern.
  4. Large, A.; Beheshti, J.; Rahman, T.: Design criteria for children's Web portals : the users speak out (2002) 0.01
    0.009161824 = product of:
      0.018323649 = sum of:
        0.018323649 = product of:
          0.036647297 = sum of:
            0.036647297 = weight(_text_:22 in 197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036647297 = score(doc=197,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 197, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=197)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 6.2005 10:34:22
  5. Bilal, D.: Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine : III. Cognitive and physical behaviors on fully self-generated search tasks (2002) 0.01
    0.009161824 = product of:
      0.018323649 = sum of:
        0.018323649 = product of:
          0.036647297 = sum of:
            0.036647297 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036647297 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Bilal, in this third part of her Yahooligans! study looks at children's performance with self-generated search tasks, as compared to previously assigned search tasks looking for differences in success, cognitive behavior, physical behavior, and task preference. Lotus ScreenCam was used to record interactions and post search interviews to record impressions. The subjects, the same 22 seventh grade children in the previous studies, generated topics of interest that were mediated with the researcher into more specific topics where necessary. Fifteen usable sessions form the basis of the study. Eleven children were successful in finding information, a rate of 73% compared to 69% in assigned research questions, and 50% in assigned fact-finding questions. Eighty-seven percent began using one or two keyword searches. Spelling was a problem. Successful children made fewer keyword searches and the number of search moves averaged 5.5 as compared to 2.4 on the research oriented task and 3.49 on the factual. Backtracking and looping were common. The self-generated task was preferred by 47% of the subjects.
  6. Su, L.T.: ¬A comprehensive and systematic model of user evaluation of Web search engines : I. Theory and background (2003) 0.01
    0.008214145 = product of:
      0.01642829 = sum of:
        0.01642829 = product of:
          0.03285658 = sum of:
            0.03285658 = weight(_text_:1997 in 5164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03285658 = score(doc=5164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.2006554 = fieldWeight in 5164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5164)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The project proposes and tests a comprehensive and systematic model of user evaluation of Web search engines. The project contains two parts. Part I describes the background and the model including a set of criteria and measures, and a method for implementation. It includes a literature review for two periods. The early period (1995-1996) portrays the settings for developing the model and the later period (1997-2000) places two applications of the model among contemporary evaluation work. Part II presents one of the applications that investigated the evaluation of four major search engines by 36 undergraduates from three academic disciplines. It reports results from statistical analyses of quantitative data for the entire sample and among disciplines, and content analysis of verbal data containing users' reasons for satisfaction. The proposed model aims to provide systematic feedback to engine developers or service providers for system improvement and to generate useful insight for system design and tool choice. The model can be applied to evaluating other compatible information retrieval systems or information retrieval (IR) techniques. It intends to contribute to developing a theory of relevance that goes beyond topicality to include value and usefulness for designing user-oriented information retrieval systems.
  7. Su, L.T.: ¬A comprehensive and systematic model of user evaluation of Web search engines : Il. An evaluation by undergraduates (2003) 0.01
    0.0076348544 = product of:
      0.015269709 = sum of:
        0.015269709 = product of:
          0.030539418 = sum of:
            0.030539418 = weight(_text_:22 in 2117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030539418 = score(doc=2117,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2117, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2117)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    24. 1.2004 18:27:22
  8. Aloteibi, S.; Sanderson, M.: Analyzing geographic query reformulation : an exploratory study (2014) 0.01
    0.0076348544 = product of:
      0.015269709 = sum of:
        0.015269709 = product of:
          0.030539418 = sum of:
            0.030539418 = weight(_text_:22 in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030539418 = score(doc=1177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 1.2014 18:48:22
  9. Su, L.T.; Chen, H.L.: Evaluation of Web search engines by undergraduate students (1999) 0.01
    0.0065713157 = product of:
      0.013142631 = sum of:
        0.013142631 = product of:
          0.026285263 = sum of:
            0.026285263 = weight(_text_:1997 in 6546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026285263 = score(doc=6546,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.16052432 = fieldWeight in 6546, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6546)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This research continues to explore the user's evaluation of Web search engines using a methodology proposed by Su (1997) and tested in a pilot study (Su, Chen, & Dong, 1998). It seeks to generate useful insight for system design and improvement, and for engine choice. The researchers were interested in how undergraduate students used four selected engines to retrieve information for their studies or personal interests and how they evaluated the interaction and search results retrieved by the four engines. Measures used were based on five evaluation criteria: relevance, efficiency, utility, user satisfaction, and connectivity. Thirty-six undergraduate juniors and seniors were recruited from the disciplines of sciences, social sciences and humanities. Each searched his/her own topic on all four engines in an assigned order and each made relevance judgements of retrieved items in relation to his/her information need or problem. The study found some significant differences among the four engines but none dominated in every aspect of the multidimensional evaluation. Alta Vista had the highest number of relevant and partially relevant documents, the best relative recall and the highest precision ratio based on PR1, Alter Vista had significantly better scores for these three measures than for Lycos. Infoseek had the highest satisfaction rating for response time. Both Infoseek and Excite had significantly higher satisfaction ratings for response time than Lycos. Excite had the best score for output display. Excite and Alta Vista had significantly better scores for output display than Lycos. Excite had the best rating for time saving while Alta Vista achieved the best score for value of search results as a whole and for overall performance. Alta Vista and Excite had significantly better ratings for these three measures than Lycos. Lycos achieved the best relevance ranking performance. Further work will provide more complete picture for engine comparison and choice by taking into account participant characteristics and identify factors contributing to the user's satisfaction to gain better insight for system design and improvement