Search (17 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  1. Kuhlen, R.: Abstracts, abstracting : intellektuelle und maschinelle Verfahren (1997) 0.02
    0.024144555 = product of:
      0.04828911 = sum of:
        0.04828911 = product of:
          0.09657822 = sum of:
            0.09657822 = weight(_text_:1997 in 7800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09657822 = score(doc=7800,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.589804 = fieldWeight in 7800, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7800)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Year
    1997
  2. Booth, A.; O'Rouke, A.J.: ¬The value of structured abstracts in information retrieval from MEDLINE (1997) 0.02
    0.020780325 = product of:
      0.04156065 = sum of:
        0.04156065 = product of:
          0.0831213 = sum of:
            0.0831213 = weight(_text_:1997 in 764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0831213 = score(doc=764,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.5076225 = fieldWeight in 764, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=764)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Health libraries review. 14(1997) no.3, S.157-166
    Year
    1997
  3. Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in social science journals? (1997) 0.02
    0.020780325 = product of:
      0.04156065 = sum of:
        0.04156065 = product of:
          0.0831213 = sum of:
            0.0831213 = weight(_text_:1997 in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0831213 = score(doc=2749,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.5076225 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Learned publishing. 10(1997) no.4, S.313-317
    Year
    1997
  4. O'Rourke, A.J.: Structured abstracts in information retrieval from biomedical databases : a literature survey (1997) 0.02
    0.018182784 = product of:
      0.03636557 = sum of:
        0.03636557 = product of:
          0.07273114 = sum of:
            0.07273114 = weight(_text_:1997 in 85) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07273114 = score(doc=85,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.44416967 = fieldWeight in 85, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=85)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Health informatics journal. 3(1997) no.1, S.17-20
    Year
    1997
  5. Sen, B.K.: Research articles in LISA Plus : problems of identification (1997) 0.02
    0.018182784 = product of:
      0.03636557 = sum of:
        0.03636557 = product of:
          0.07273114 = sum of:
            0.07273114 = weight(_text_:1997 in 430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07273114 = score(doc=430,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.44416967 = fieldWeight in 430, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=430)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Malaysian journal of library and information science. 2(1997) no.1, S.97-106
    Year
    1997
  6. Jizba, L.: Reflections on summarizing and abstracting : implications for Internet Web documents, and standardized library cataloging databases (1997) 0.02
    0.018182784 = product of:
      0.03636557 = sum of:
        0.03636557 = product of:
          0.07273114 = sum of:
            0.07273114 = weight(_text_:1997 in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07273114 = score(doc=701,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.44416967 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 1(1997) no.2, S.15-39
    Year
    1997
  7. Spiteri, L.F.: Library and information science vs business : a comparison of approaches to abstracting (1997) 0.02
    0.018182784 = product of:
      0.03636557 = sum of:
        0.03636557 = product of:
          0.07273114 = sum of:
            0.07273114 = weight(_text_:1997 in 3699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07273114 = score(doc=3699,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.44416967 = fieldWeight in 3699, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3699)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 20(1997) no.4, S.197-200
    Year
    1997
  8. Cremmins, E.T.: ¬The art of abstracting (1996) 0.02
    0.01642829 = product of:
      0.03285658 = sum of:
        0.03285658 = product of:
          0.06571316 = sum of:
            0.06571316 = weight(_text_:1997 in 282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06571316 = score(doc=282,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.4013108 = fieldWeight in 282, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=282)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 48(1997) no.7, S.670-671 (C.A. Bean)
  9. Wheatley, A.; Armstrong, C.J.: Metadata, recall, and abstracts : can abstracts ever be reliable indicators of document value? (1997) 0.02
    0.015585244 = product of:
      0.031170487 = sum of:
        0.031170487 = product of:
          0.062340975 = sum of:
            0.062340975 = weight(_text_:1997 in 824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062340975 = score(doc=824,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.38071686 = fieldWeight in 824, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=824)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 49(1997) no.8, S.206-213
    Year
    1997
  10. Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995) 0.02
    0.015269709 = product of:
      0.030539418 = sum of:
        0.030539418 = product of:
          0.061078835 = sum of:
            0.061078835 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061078835 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 1.1996 18:22:06
  11. Cremmins, E.T.: ¬The art of abstracting (1996) 0.01
    0.013142631 = product of:
      0.026285263 = sum of:
        0.026285263 = product of:
          0.052570526 = sum of:
            0.052570526 = weight(_text_:1997 in 1007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052570526 = score(doc=1007,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.32104865 = fieldWeight in 1007, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1007)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of chemical information and computer sciences 36(1996) no.5, S.1050 (V.K. Raman); Information processing and management 33(1997) no.4, S.573 (H.R. Tibbo)
  12. Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988) 0.01
    0.012215767 = product of:
      0.024431534 = sum of:
        0.024431534 = product of:
          0.04886307 = sum of:
            0.04886307 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04886307 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
  13. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.01
    0.009161824 = product of:
      0.018323649 = sum of:
        0.018323649 = product of:
          0.036647297 = sum of:
            0.036647297 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036647297 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  14. Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996) 0.01
    0.009161824 = product of:
      0.018323649 = sum of:
        0.018323649 = product of:
          0.036647297 = sum of:
            0.036647297 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036647297 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  15. Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006) 0.01
    0.009161824 = product of:
      0.018323649 = sum of:
        0.018323649 = product of:
          0.036647297 = sum of:
            0.036647297 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036647297 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  16. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996) 0.01
    0.0076348544 = product of:
      0.015269709 = sum of:
        0.015269709 = product of:
          0.030539418 = sum of:
            0.030539418 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030539418 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356
  17. Brintzinger, K.-R.: Abstracts im Verbund : Von der bibliothekarischen zur nutzerorientierten Erschließung. ein Versuch des Juristischen Seminars der Universität Tübingen (2003) 0.01
    0.0065713157 = product of:
      0.013142631 = sum of:
        0.013142631 = product of:
          0.026285263 = sum of:
            0.026285263 = weight(_text_:1997 in 1548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026285263 = score(doc=1548,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04508122 = queryNorm
                0.16052432 = fieldWeight in 1548, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1548)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Der etwas provokante Titel soll keineswegs eine Dichotomie zwischen bibliothekarischer und nutzerorientierter Erschließung implizieren, sondern zwei Fragen stellen: Was suchen Nutzer in Bibliotheken? Was wollen Nutzer wissen? Die Antwort darauf wird immer heißen: Nutzer suchen nach Inhalten und wollen Informationen über Inhalte. Formale Aspekte, die unter bibliothekarischen Gesichtspunkten durchaus bedeutend sind, spielen für den Nutzer keine große Rolle, Schlagworte als Instrumente der verbalen Sacherschließung beschreiben Inhalte häufig unzureichend und sind für Nutzer vielfach unverständlich. Die bunten Kataloge der Internet-Buchhändler stellen zunehmend einen Kontrast, aber auch eine Konkurrenz zu unseren OPACs dar. Wer in diesen Katalogen recherchiert, findet zwar meist nur eine rudimentäre und natürlich bibliothekarischen Kriterien nicht entsprechende Titelbeschreibung, dafür jedoch regelmäßig zusätzliche Informationen wie Abstracts oder Verlagsinformationen, Rezensionen, Abbildungen, Textproben. Sollen wir uns nun den Katalog von Amazon.de (und seiner Konkurrenten) zum Vorbild nehmen? Wir meinen ja und erfassen daher Abstracts und andere Inhaltsinformationen, die wir mit unseren Titelaufnahmen im Verbund verlinken. Wir sehen darin eine Fortsetzung unseres seit einigen Jahren verfolgten Zieles, die traditionelle Sach- und Formalerschließung um neue Komponenten zu erweitern. Seit 1997 beteiligen wir uns an der kooperativen Aufsatzerschließung, insbesondere durch die Katalogisierung von Festschriftenaufsätzen. Aufsätze in fortlaufenden Sammelwerken katalogisieren wir nur ausnahmsweise, jedoch weisen wir von den Verlagen im Internet angebotene Inhaltsinformationen über Zeitschriften (Inhaltsverzeichnisse, Abstracts, Volltexte) auf der lokalen Ebene nach. Mit unserem Versuch, Abstracts in eine Datenbank des Verbundes einzustellen, haben wir Ende 2000 begonnen. Von ausgewählten Monographien werden Klappentexte, Verlagsinformationen und Abstracts erfasst und mit der Titelaufnahme verlinkt. Unser bisheriges Verfahren ist handgestrickt - hat aber den Vorteil, dass es ohne zusätzliche Technik auskommt und unmittelbar umsetzbar ist: In einem ersten Schritt werden Klappentexte und Inhaltsinformationen von geeigneten Werken ausgewählt. Die Auswahl berücksichtigt sowohl die Bedeutung des Buches wie Umfang und Qualität der Inhaltsinformationen. Das Erfassen der Texte geschieht durch Einscannen oder - wenn dies bei kurzen Texten effizienter ist - durch Abschreiben. Bei einzelnen Verlagen ist es möglich, die Texte direkt von den Webseiten des Verlages per copy-and-paste zu übernehmen. Die Doktoranden unserer Fakultät bitten wir um die Lieferung des Abstracts als Textdatei. Die durch Einscannen, Abschreiben oder Kopieren erzeugte Textdatei wird im nächsten Schritt in eine vom BSZ entwickelte Muster-HTML-Datei kopiert, konvertiert und mit der SWBIdentnummer versehen. Anschließend senden wir diese Datei per E-Mail an den Verbund. Der Verbund stellt unsere Dateien in den BSZ-Medienserver (http://www.bszbw.de/diglib/medserv/metainfhtml) ein, auf dem z.B. auch die ebenfalls mit den VerbundTiteldaten verlinkten IfB- und ekz-Rezensionen gespeichert werden."