Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

0.025975406 = product of:
  0.051950812 = sum of:
    0.051950812 = product of:
      0.103901625 = sum of:
        0.103901625 = weight(_text_:1997 in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.103901625 = score(doc=5346,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.6345281 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Teil von: Final Report to the ALCTS/CCS Subject Analysis Committee. June 1997 (http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/finalreport.cfm).

Year

1997

0.01075708 = product of:
  0.02151416 = sum of:
    0.02151416 = product of:
      0.04302832 = sum of:
        0.04302832 = weight(_text_:1997 in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04302832 = score(doc=1800,freq=7.0), product of:
            0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.26277432 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
              2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
                7.0 = termFreq=7.0
              3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool

Issue

June 1997

Year

1997

0.010688796 = product of:
  0.021377591 = sum of:
    0.021377591 = product of:
      0.042755183 = sum of:
        0.042755183 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042755183 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

11. 2.2011 18:22:25

0.009856974 = product of:
  0.019713948 = sum of:
    0.019713948 = product of:
      0.039427895 = sum of:
        0.039427895 = weight(_text_:1997 in 1162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039427895 = score(doc=1162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.2407865 = fieldWeight in 1162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) is a theory and method for extracting and representing the contextual-usage meaning of words by statistical computations applied to a large corpus of text (Landauer and Dumais, 1997). The underlying idea is that the aggregate of all the word contexts in which a given word does and does not appear provides a set of mutual constraints that largely determines the similarity of meaning of words and sets of words to each other. The adequacy of LSA's reflection of human knowledge has been established in a variety of ways. For example, its scores overlap those of humans on standard vocabulary and subject matter tests; it mimics human word sorting and category judgments; it simulates word-word and passage-word lexical priming data; and as reported in 3 following articles in this issue, it accurately estimates passage coherence, learnability of passages by individual students, and the quality and quantity of knowledge contained in an essay.

0.009091392 = product of:
  0.018182784 = sum of:
    0.018182784 = product of:
      0.03636557 = sum of:
        0.03636557 = weight(_text_:1997 in 1164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03636557 = score(doc=1164,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.1637463 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.22208484 = fieldWeight in 1164, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1164)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

http://www.aaai.org/Papers/Symposia/Spring/1997/SS-97-05/SS97-05-021.pdf]

Year

1997

0.0061078835 = product of:
  0.012215767 = sum of:
    0.012215767 = product of:
      0.024431534 = sum of:
        0.024431534 = weight(_text_:22 in 1163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024431534 = score(doc=1163,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1163, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1163)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Link Analysis, Counterterrorism, and Security, SIAM Data Mining Conference, Bethesda, MD, 20-22 April, 2006. [http://www.siam.org/meetings/sdm06/workproceed/Link%20Analysis/15.pdf]

0.0061078835 = product of:
  0.012215767 = sum of:
    0.012215767 = product of:
      0.024431534 = sum of:
        0.024431534 = weight(_text_:22 in 3447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024431534 = score(doc=3447,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15786676 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04508122 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3447, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3447)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 2.2017 10:16:49