Search (42 results, page 1 of 3)

Hauffe, H.: Zitationsanalysen : Editoral (1999) 0.06

0.058429915 = product of:
  0.11685983 = sum of:
    0.11685983 = product of:
      0.23371966 = sum of:
        0.23371966 = weight(_text_:1999 in 4378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23371966 = score(doc=4378,freq=7.0), product of:
            0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            1.2222846 = fieldWeight in 4378, product of:
              2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
                7.0 = termFreq=7.0
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4378)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Online Mitteilungen. 1999, Nr.65, S.3-6 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 52(1999) H.3/4]
Year: 1999

Huber, C.: Web of science (1999) 0.06

0.056436904 = product of:
  0.11287381 = sum of:
    0.11287381 = product of:
      0.22574762 = sum of:
        0.22574762 = weight(_text_:1999 in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22574762 = score(doc=3595,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            1.1805931 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Library journal. 124(1999) no.2, S.132
Year: 1999

Page, L.; Brin, S.; Motwani, R.; Winograd, T.: ¬The PageRank citation ranking : Bringing order to the Web (1999) 0.05

0.049382288 = product of:
  0.098764576 = sum of:
    0.098764576 = product of:
      0.19752915 = sum of:
        0.19752915 = weight(_text_:1999 in 496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19752915 = score(doc=496,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            1.033019 = fieldWeight in 496, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=496)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: http://dbpubs.stanford.edu:8090/pub/1999-66
Year: 1999

Fröhlich, G.: ¬Das Messen des leicht Meßbaren : Output-Indikatoren, Impact-Maße: Artefakte der Szeintometrie? (1999) 0.04

0.041735653 = product of:
  0.083471306 = sum of:
    0.083471306 = product of:
      0.16694261 = sum of:
        0.16694261 = weight(_text_:1999 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16694261 = score(doc=4379,freq=7.0), product of:
            0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.87306035 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
              2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
                7.0 = termFreq=7.0
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Online Mitteilungen. 1999, Nr.65, S.7-21 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 52(1999) H.3/4]
Year: 1999

Castro, R. de; Grossmann, J.W.: Famous trails to Paul Erdös (1999) 0.03

0.028218452 = product of:
  0.056436904 = sum of:
    0.056436904 = product of:
      0.11287381 = sum of:
        0.11287381 = weight(_text_:1999 in 3991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11287381 = score(doc=3991,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.59029657 = fieldWeight in 3991, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3991)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Mathematical intelligencer. 21(1999) no.3, S.51-63
Year: 1999

Small, H.: Visualizing science by citation mapping (1999) 0.02

0.024691144 = product of:
  0.049382288 = sum of:
    0.049382288 = product of:
      0.098764576 = sum of:
        0.098764576 = weight(_text_:1999 in 3920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.098764576 = score(doc=3920,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.5165095 = fieldWeight in 3920, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.9, S.799-813
Year: 1999

Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02

0.024534248 = product of:
  0.049068496 = sum of:
    0.049068496 = product of:
      0.09813699 = sum of:
        0.09813699 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09813699 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 13. 7.2008 19:53:22

Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.02

0.024534248 = product of:
  0.049068496 = sum of:
    0.049068496 = product of:
      0.09813699 = sum of:
        0.09813699 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09813699 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 7. 2.2005 14:10:22

Davis, P.M.; Cohen, S.A.: ¬The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior 1996-1999 (2001) 0.02
```
0.023183824 = product of:
  0.04636765 = sum of:
    0.04636765 = product of:
      0.0927353 = sum of:
        0.0927353 = weight(_text_:1999 in 5768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0927353 = score(doc=5768,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.48497814 = fieldWeight in 5768, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5768)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

A citation analysis of undergraduate term papers in microeconomics revealed a significant decrease in the frequency of scholarly resources cited between 1996 and 1999. Book citations decreased from 30% to 19%, newspaper citations increased from 7% to 19%, and Web citations increased from 9% to 21%. Web citations checked in 2000 revealed that only 18% of URLs cited in 1996 led to the correct Internet document. For 1999 bibliographies, only 55% of URLs led to the correct document. The authors recommend (1) setting stricter guidelines for acceptable citations in course assignments; (2) creating and maintaining scholarly portals for authoritative Web sites with a commitment to long-term access; and (3) continuing to instruct students how to critically evaluate resources

Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y.: Scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and humanities : the flow of ides within and among disciplines (1998) 0.02

0.022308644 = product of:
  0.044617288 = sum of:
    0.044617288 = product of:
      0.089234576 = sum of:
        0.089234576 = weight(_text_:1999 in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089234576 = score(doc=4063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.4666704 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote: Rez. in: JASIS 50(1999) no.13, S.1259-1261 (J. Andersen)

Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02

0.021685416 = product of:
  0.04337083 = sum of:
    0.04337083 = product of:
      0.08674166 = sum of:
        0.08674166 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08674166 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15853046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 22. 7.2006 15:22:28

Stock, W.G.: ¬Ein Netz wissenschaftlicher Informationen : gesponnen aus Fußnoten (1999) 0.02

0.02116384 = product of:
  0.04232768 = sum of:
    0.04232768 = product of:
      0.08465536 = sum of:
        0.08465536 = weight(_text_:1999 in 3890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08465536 = score(doc=3890,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.44272244 = fieldWeight in 3890, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3890)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Password. 1999, H.7/8, S.21-25
Year: 1999

Száva-Kováts, E.: Indirect-collective referencing (ICR) : life course, nature, and importance of a special kind of science referencing (1999) 0.02

0.02116384 = product of:
  0.04232768 = sum of:
    0.04232768 = product of:
      0.08465536 = sum of:
        0.08465536 = weight(_text_:1999 in 4298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08465536 = score(doc=4298,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.44272244 = fieldWeight in 4298, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4298)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.14, S.1284-1294
Year: 1999

Lawrence, S.; Giles, C.L.; Bollaker, K.: Digital libraries and Autonomous Citation Indexing (1999) 0.02

0.02116384 = product of:
  0.04232768 = sum of:
    0.04232768 = product of:
      0.08465536 = sum of:
        0.08465536 = weight(_text_:1999 in 4951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08465536 = score(doc=4951,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.44272244 = fieldWeight in 4951, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4951)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: IEEE Computer. 32(1999) no.6, S.67-71
Year: 1999

Leydesdorff, L.: Theories of citation? (1999) 0.02

0.01912568 = product of:
  0.03825136 = sum of:
    0.03825136 = product of:
      0.07650272 = sum of:
        0.07650272 = weight(_text_:1999 in 5130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07650272 = score(doc=5130,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.40008652 = fieldWeight in 5130, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5130)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Year: 1999

Wagner-Döbler, R.: ¬Die Nutzung von Zitationsindizes durch deutsche Soziologen : Ergebnisse einer Umfrage (2001) 0.02
```
0.015616051 = product of:
  0.031232102 = sum of:
    0.031232102 = product of:
      0.062464204 = sum of:
        0.062464204 = weight(_text_:1999 in 6831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062464204 = score(doc=6831,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.32666928 = fieldWeight in 6831, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6831)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Über das Ausmaß der Nutzung der Zitationsindizes des Institute for Scientific Information ist wenig bekannt; dies gilt insbesondere auch für den Social Science Citation Index (SSCI). Eine im Sommer 1999 durchgeführte Untersuchung unter deutschen Soziologen bestätigte bekannte Schwachpunkte des SSCI in Bezug auf Sprachraum und Literaturformen. Rund die Hälfte der antwortenden Soziologen gehörte zu den Nutzern, von denen wiederum die Hälfte den SSCI nur selten in Anspruch nahmen. etwa die Hälfte der Antwortenden hält die Auswertung von Zitationsindizes für eine sinnvolle informationelle Ergänzung der Evaluation sozialwissenschaftlicher Forschungsleistungen. Als weiteres Umfragergebnis zeigte sich, dass das Phanomen unsubstanzieller Koautorenschaft auch in der Soziologie weit verbreitet ist
Whitley, K.M.: Analysis of SciFinder Scholar and Web of Science citation searches (2002) 0.02
```
0.015616051 = product of:
  0.031232102 = sum of:
    0.031232102 = product of:
      0.062464204 = sum of:
        0.062464204 = weight(_text_:1999 in 1255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062464204 = score(doc=1255,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.32666928 = fieldWeight in 1255, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1255)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Chemical Abstracts Service recently unveiled citation searching in Chemical Abstracts. With Chemical Abstracts and Science Citation Index both now available for citation searching, this study compares the duplication and uniqueness of citing references for works of chemistry researchers for the years 1999-2001. The two indexes cover very similar source material, so one would expect the citation results to be very similar. This analysis of SciFinder Scholar and Web of Science shows some important differences as the databases are currently offered. Authors and institutions using citation counts as measures of scientific productivity should take note.

Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.02

0.015333905 = product of:
  0.03066781 = sum of:
    0.03066781 = product of:
      0.06133562 = sum of:
        0.06133562 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06133562 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25

Chen, C.; Paul, R.J.; O'Keefe, B.: Fitting the Jigsaw of citation : information visualization in domain analysis (2001) 0.01
```
0.013385187 = product of:
  0.026770374 = sum of:
    0.026770374 = product of:
      0.053540748 = sum of:
        0.053540748 = weight(_text_:1999 in 5766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053540748 = score(doc=5766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.28000224 = fieldWeight in 5766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5766)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Domain visualization is one of the new research fronts resulted from the proliferation of information visualization, aiming to reveal the essence of a knowledge domain. Information visualization plays an integral role in modeling and representing intellectual structures associated with scientific disciplines. In this article, the domain of computer graphics is visualized based on author cocitation patterns derived from an 18-year span of the prestigious IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications (1982-1999). This domain visualization utilizes a series of visualization and animation techniques, including author cocitation maps, citation time lines, animation of a highdimensional specialty space, and institutional profiles. This approach not only augments traditional domain analysis and the understanding of scientific disciplines, but also produces a persistent and shared knowledge space for researchers to keep track the development of knowledge more effectively. The results of the domain visualization are discussed and triangulated in a broader context of the computer graphics field
Abt, H.A.; Garfield, E.: Is the relationship between numbers of references and paper lengths the same for all sciences? (2002) 0.01
```
0.013385187 = product of:
  0.026770374 = sum of:
    0.026770374 = product of:
      0.053540748 = sum of:
        0.053540748 = weight(_text_:1999 in 5223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053540748 = score(doc=5223,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.28000224 = fieldWeight in 5223, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5223)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

It has been shown in the physical sciences that a paper's length is related to its number of references in a linear manner. Abt and Garfield here look at the life and social sciences with the thought that if the relation holds the citation counts will provide a measure of relative importance across these disciplines. In the life sciences 200 research papers from 1999-2000 were scanned in each of 10 journals to produce counts of 1000 word normalized pages. In the social sciences an average of 70 research papers in nine journals were scanned for the two-year period. Papers of average length in the various sciences have the same average number of references within plus or minus 17%. A look at the 30 to 60 papers over the two years in 18 review journals indicates twice the references of research papers of the same length.

Search (42 results, page 1 of 3)

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes