Search (60 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.06 
    0.060728364 = product of:
  0.12145673 = sum of:
    0.12145673 = sum of:
      0.08465536 = weight(_text_:1999 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08465536 = score(doc=2655,freq=5.0), product of:
          0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045270752 = queryNorm
          0.44272244 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
            2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
              5.0 = termFreq=5.0
            4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
      0.03680137 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03680137 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15853046 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045270752 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The term "facet" was introduced into the field of library classification systems by Ranganathan in the 1930's [Ranganathan, 1962]. A facet is a viewpoint or aspect. In contrast to traditional classification systems, faceted systems are modular in that a domain is analyzed in terms of baseline facets which are then synthesized. In this paper, the term "facet" is used in a broader meaning. Facets can describe different aspects on the same level of abstraction or the same aspect on different levels of abstraction. The notion of facets is related to database views, multicontexts and conceptual scaling in formal concept analysis [Ganter and Wille, 1999], polymorphism in object-oriented design, aspect-oriented programming, views and contexts in description logic and semantic networks. This paper presents a definition of facets in terms of faceted knowledge representation that incorporates the traditional narrower notion of facets and potentially facilitates translation between different knowledge representation formalisms. A goal of this approach is a modular, machine-aided knowledge base design mechanism. A possible application is faceted thesaurus construction for information retrieval and data mining. Reasoning complexity depends on the size of the modules (facets). A more general analysis of complexity will be left for future research.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
    Year
    1999
  2. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.06 
    0.059718825 = product of:
  0.11943765 = sum of:
    0.11943765 = sum of:
      0.07650272 = weight(_text_:1999 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07650272 = score(doc=2654,freq=3.0), product of:
          0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045270752 = queryNorm
          0.40008652 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
            1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
              3.0 = termFreq=3.0
            4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.04293493 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04293493 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15853046 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045270752 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
    Year
    1999
  3. Rath, H.H.: Mozart oder Kugel : Mit Topic Maps intelligente Informationsnetze aufbauen (1999) 0.06 
    0.056436904 = product of:
  0.11287381 = sum of:
    0.11287381 = product of:
      0.22574762 = sum of:
        0.22574762 = weight(_text_:1999 in 3893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22574762 = score(doc=3893,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            1.1805931 = fieldWeight in 3893, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3893)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    iX. 1999, H.12, S.149-155
    Year
    1999
  4. Prud'hommeaux, E.; Gayo, E.: RDF ventures to boldly meet your most pedestrian needs (2015) 0.05 
    0.04517106 = product of:
  0.09034212 = sum of:
    0.09034212 = sum of:
      0.053540748 = weight(_text_:1999 in 2024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053540748 = score(doc=2024,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045270752 = queryNorm
          0.28000224 = fieldWeight in 2024, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2024)
      0.03680137 = weight(_text_:22 in 2024) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03680137 = score(doc=2024,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15853046 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045270752 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2024, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2024)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Defined in 1999 and paired with XML, the Resource Description Framework (RDF) has been cast as an RDF Schema, producing data that is well-structured but not validated, permitting certain illogical relationships. When stakeholders convened in 2014 to consider solutions to the data validation challenge, a W3C working group proposed Resource Shapes and Shape Expressions to describe the properties expected for an RDF node. Resistance rose from concerns about data and schema reuse, key principles in RDF. Ideally data types and properties are designed for broad use, but they are increasingly adopted with local restrictions for specific purposes. Resource Shapes are commonly treated as record classes, standing in for data structures but losing flexibility for later reuse. Of various solutions to the resulting tensions, the concept of record classes may be the most reasonable basis for agreement, satisfying stakeholders' objectives while allowing for variations with constraints.
    Source
    Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 41(2015) no.4, S.18-22
  5. ISO/IEC FCD 13250: Topic maps. Information technology (1999) 0.04 
    0.04371584 = product of:
  0.08743168 = sum of:
    0.08743168 = product of:
      0.17486335 = sum of:
        0.17486335 = weight(_text_:1999 in 319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17486335 = score(doc=319,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.9144835 = fieldWeight in 319, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=319)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Year
    1999
  6. Hocker, J.; Schindler, C.; Rittberger, M.: Participatory design for ontologies : a case study of an open science ontology for qualitative coding schemas (2020) 0.03 
    0.03011404 = product of:
  0.06022808 = sum of:
    0.06022808 = sum of:
      0.03569383 = weight(_text_:1999 in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03569383 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045270752 = queryNorm
          0.18666816 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
      0.024534248 = weight(_text_:22 in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024534248 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15853046 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045270752 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose The open science movement calls for transparent and retraceable research processes. While infrastructures to support these practices in qualitative research are lacking, the design needs to consider different approaches and workflows. The paper bases on the definition of ontologies as shared conceptualizations of knowledge (Borst, 1999). The authors argue that participatory design is a good way to create these shared conceptualizations by giving domain experts and future users a voice in the design process via interviews, workshops and observations. Design/methodology/approach This paper presents a novel approach for creating ontologies in the field of open science using participatory design. As a case study the creation of an ontology for qualitative coding schemas is presented. Coding schemas are an important result of qualitative research, and reuse can yield great potential for open science making qualitative research more transparent, enhance sharing of coding schemas and teaching of qualitative methods. The participatory design process consisted of three parts: a requirement analysis using interviews and an observation, a design phase accompanied by interviews and an evaluation phase based on user tests as well as interviews. Findings The research showed several positive outcomes due to participatory design: higher commitment of users, mutual learning, high quality feedback and better quality of the ontology. However, there are two obstacles in this approach: First, contradictive answers by the interviewees, which needs to be balanced; second, this approach takes more time due to interview planning and analysis. Practical implications The implication of the paper is in the long run to decentralize the design of open science infrastructures and to involve parties affected on several levels. Originality/value In ontology design, several methods exist by using user-centered design or participatory design doing workshops. In this paper, the authors outline the potentials for participatory design using mainly interviews in creating an ontology for open science. The authors focus on close contact to researchers in order to build the ontology upon the expert's knowledge.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  7. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.03 
    0.026963232 = product of:
  0.053926464 = sum of:
    0.053926464 = product of:
      0.21570586 = sum of:
        0.21570586 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21570586 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38380593 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  8. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Bessere Information durch Zusammenfassen aus dem WWW (1999) 0.02 
    0.02185792 = product of:
  0.04371584 = sum of:
    0.04371584 = product of:
      0.08743168 = sum of:
        0.08743168 = weight(_text_:1999 in 4496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08743168 = score(doc=4496,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.45724174 = fieldWeight in 4496, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4496)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Year
    1999
  9. Wright, L.W.; Nardini, H.K.G.; Aronson, A.R.; Rindflesch, T.C.: Hierarchical concept indexing of full-text documents in the Unified Medical Language System Information sources Map (1999) 0.02 
    0.02116384 = product of:
  0.04232768 = sum of:
    0.04232768 = product of:
      0.08465536 = sum of:
        0.08465536 = weight(_text_:1999 in 2111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08465536 = score(doc=2111,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.44272244 = fieldWeight in 2111, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2111)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.6, S.514-523
    Year
    1999
  10. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.02 
    0.017975489 = product of:
  0.035950977 = sum of:
    0.035950977 = product of:
      0.14380391 = sum of:
        0.14380391 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14380391 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38380593 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  11. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.02 
    0.017975489 = product of:
  0.035950977 = sum of:
    0.035950977 = product of:
      0.14380391 = sum of:
        0.14380391 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14380391 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38380593 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  12. Hesse, W.; Verrijn-Stuart, A.: Towards a theory of information systems : the FRISCO approach (1999) 0.02 
    0.017636532 = product of:
  0.035273064 = sum of:
    0.035273064 = product of:
      0.07054613 = sum of:
        0.07054613 = weight(_text_:1999 in 3059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07054613 = score(doc=3059,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.19121543 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.36893535 = fieldWeight in 3059, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.2238183 = idf(docFreq=1759, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3059)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Information Systems (IS) is among the most widespread terms in the Computer Science field but a well founded, widely accepted theory of IS is still missing. With the Internet publication of the FRISCO report, the IFIP task group "FRamework of Information System COncepts" has taken a first step towards such a theory. Among the major achievements of this report are: (1) it builds on a solid basis formed by semiotics and ontology, (2) it defines a compendium of about 100 core IS concepts in a coherent and consistent way, (3) it goes beyond the common narrow view of information systems as pure technical artefacts by adopting an interdisciplinary, socio-technical view on them. In the autumn of 1999, a first review of the report and its impact was undertaken at the ISCO-4 conference in Leiden. In a workshop specifically devoted to the subject, the original aims and goals of FRISCO were confirmed to be still valid and the overall approach and achievements of the report were acknowledged. On the other hand, the workshop revealed some misconceptions, errors and weaknesses of the report in its present form, which are to be removed through a comprehensive revision now under way. This paper reports on the results of the Leiden conference and the current revision activities. It also points out some important consequences of the FRISCO approach as a whole.
    Year
    1999
  13. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.02 
    0.015333905 = product of:
  0.03066781 = sum of:
    0.03066781 = product of:
      0.06133562 = sum of:
        0.06133562 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06133562 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.11-22
  14. Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017) 0.02 
    0.015333905 = product of:
  0.03066781 = sum of:
    0.03066781 = product of:
      0.06133562 = sum of:
        0.06133562 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06133562 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    13.12.2017 14:17:22
  15. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.02 
    0.015333905 = product of:
  0.03066781 = sum of:
    0.03066781 = product of:
      0.06133562 = sum of:
        0.06133562 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06133562 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
  16. Haller, S.H.M.: Mappingverfahren zur Wissensorganisation (2002) 0.02 
    0.015333905 = product of:
  0.03066781 = sum of:
    0.03066781 = product of:
      0.06133562 = sum of:
        0.06133562 = weight(_text_:22 in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06133562 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30. 5.2010 16:22:35
  17. Nielsen, M.: Neuronale Netze : Alpha Go - Computer lernen Intuition (2018) 0.02 
    0.015333905 = product of:
  0.03066781 = sum of:
    0.03066781 = product of:
      0.06133562 = sum of:
        0.06133562 = weight(_text_:22 in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06133562 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.1, S.22-27
  18. Börner, K.: Atlas of knowledge : anyone can map (2015) 0.01 
    0.013011251 = product of:
  0.026022501 = sum of:
    0.026022501 = product of:
      0.052045003 = sum of:
        0.052045003 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052045003 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15853046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2017 16:54:03
    22. 1.2017 17:10:56
  19. Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009) 0.01 
    0.012267124 = product of:
  0.024534248 = sum of:
    0.024534248 = product of:
      0.049068496 = sum of:
        0.049068496 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049068496 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    31. 7.2010 16:58:22
  20. OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004) 0.01 
    0.012267124 = product of:
  0.024534248 = sum of:
    0.024534248 = product of:
      0.049068496 = sum of:
        0.049068496 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049068496 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15853046 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045270752 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    14. 8.2011 13:33:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 47
  • d 13

Types

  • a 43
  • el 15
  • x 5
  • m 2
  • n 2
  • r 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications