Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

Riesthuis, G.J.A.: ¬The UDC master reference file (1998) 0.04

0.04136903 = product of:
  0.08273806 = sum of:
    0.08273806 = product of:
      0.16547611 = sum of:
        0.16547611 = weight(_text_:1998 in 7497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16547611 = score(doc=7497,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.17527951 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04540776 = queryNorm
            0.9440699 = fieldWeight in 7497, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7497)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 20(1998), S.21-26
Year: 1998

Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Some thoughts about the format of the Master Reference File database (2000) 0.03

0.026101258 = product of:
  0.052202515 = sum of:
    0.052202515 = product of:
      0.10440503 = sum of:
        0.10440503 = weight(_text_:22 in 6405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10440503 = score(doc=6405,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15901025 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04540776 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 6405, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6405)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.15-22

Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Zoeken met woorden : hergebruik van onderwerpsontsluiting (1998) 0.02

0.02288879 = product of:
  0.04577758 = sum of:
    0.04577758 = product of:
      0.09155516 = sum of:
        0.09155516 = weight(_text_:1998 in 3154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09155516 = score(doc=3154,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.17527951 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04540776 = queryNorm
            0.5223381 = fieldWeight in 3154, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3154)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Year: 1998

Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Stuurman, P.: Tendenzen in de onderwerpsontsluiting : T.3: Gecontroleerde informatietalen (1990) 0.02

0.021532437 = product of:
  0.043064874 = sum of:
    0.043064874 = product of:
      0.08612975 = sum of:
        0.08612975 = weight(_text_:22 in 210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08612975 = score(doc=210,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15901025 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04540776 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 210, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=210)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Open. 22(1990) no.1, S.11-15

Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Stuurman, P.: Tendenzen in de onderwerpsontsluiting : T.4: Onderwerpsontsluiting en on-line catalogi (1990) 0.02

0.021532437 = product of:
  0.043064874 = sum of:
    0.043064874 = product of:
      0.08612975 = sum of:
        0.08612975 = weight(_text_:22 in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08612975 = score(doc=211,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15901025 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04540776 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Open. 22(1990) no.10, S.326-330

Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Decomposition of UDC-numbers and the text of the UDC Master Reference File (1998) 0.02

0.016022155 = product of:
  0.03204431 = sum of:
    0.03204431 = product of:
      0.06408862 = sum of:
        0.06408862 = weight(_text_:1998 in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06408862 = score(doc=399,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.17527951 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04540776 = queryNorm
            0.36563668 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Year: 1998

Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Zumer, M.: ¬The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and knowledge organization (2003) 0.01
```
0.013082035 = product of:
  0.02616407 = sum of:
    0.02616407 = product of:
      0.05232814 = sum of:
        0.05232814 = weight(_text_:1998 in 2699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05232814 = score(doc=2699,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17527951 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04540776 = queryNorm
            0.2985411 = fieldWeight in 2699, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2699)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR, 1998), the study commissioned by IFLA, brings revolutionary changes in the way we see modern computer catalogues. The catalogue is not seen as a sequence of bibliographic records and a copy of a card catalogue, but as an interconnected network of related information. Implications of the new model for the future development of catalogues are discussed. Special attention is given to access points and relationships between entities and the changes those will bring into both the formal and subject cataloguing, and authority files.
Zumer, M.; Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Consequences of implementing FRBR : are we ready to open pandora's box? (2002) 0.01
```
0.011213172 = product of:
  0.022426344 = sum of:
    0.022426344 = product of:
      0.04485269 = sum of:
        0.04485269 = weight(_text_:1998 in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04485269 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17527951 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04540776 = queryNorm
            0.25589237 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

The study Functional Requirements for Bibliograpbic Records (FRBR) was commissioned by IFLA and published in 1998. It defines the core functions of a catalogue (and bibliographic records) as a gateway to information. For that purpose an abstract entity-relationship model of a catalogue is proposed. The FRBR model is revolutionary. The (computer) catalogue is not seen as a sequence of bibliographic records and a replica of the traditional card catalogue, but rather as a network of connected entities, enabling the user to perform seamlessly all the necessary functions. So far there has been some theoretical discussion of the model and some limited experiments, but there is a lack of research in how to implement this theoretical model in practice, in new-generation catalogues. In this paper some reactions to the model are analysed. The main focus is an consequences of the model for the OPAC interface design, particularly the searching functionality and display of results.
Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Zumer, M.: FRBR and FRANAR : subject access (2004) 0.01
```
0.010571881 = product of:
  0.021143762 = sum of:
    0.021143762 = product of:
      0.042287525 = sum of:
        0.042287525 = weight(_text_:1998 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042287525 = score(doc=2646,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17527951 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04540776 = queryNorm
            0.24125765 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Content

1. Introduction In this paper we address two questions: 1. What is the position of subject indexing in the thinking of the library world after the publication of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (1998)? 2. Is this position in accordance with the requirements of the users searching for documents about a given subject? Research Shows that searching an a topic (i.e. subject access) is an important, even predominant type of end-user searching of library catalogues and even more so of other bibliographic databases. Between one third and two thirds of all OPAC searches are probably subject searches (Large & Beheshti, 199%). Taking into account different ways in which searching an a topic is implemented in library catalogues (subject headings, classification, keywords only) the percentage may be even higher. For example title word searching may be a substitute for subject searching if no better tools are available. In the light of this it is not surprising that the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) (1998) pays attention to subject searching, as well as the Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR) (2003). Also the Statement of International Cataloguing Principles: Final draft of 19 December 2003, which is the result of the first First IFLA Meeting of Experts an an International Cataloguing Code mentiong subject access as a function of cataloguing (Statement, 2003). In this paper we discuss the ways these three documents deal with subjects.

Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes