Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Zumer, M."
  1. Zumer, M.; Clavel, G.: EDLproject : one more step towards the European digtial library (2007) 0.02 
    0.018456373 = product of:
  0.036912747 = sum of:
    0.036912747 = product of:
      0.07382549 = sum of:
        0.07382549 = weight(_text_:22 in 3184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07382549 = score(doc=3184,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15901025 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04540776 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3184, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3184)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vortrag anläasslich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  2. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Zumer, M.: ¬The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and knowledge organization (2003) 0.01 
    0.013082035 = product of:
  0.02616407 = sum of:
    0.02616407 = product of:
      0.05232814 = sum of:
        0.05232814 = weight(_text_:1998 in 2699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05232814 = score(doc=2699,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17527951 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04540776 = queryNorm
            0.2985411 = fieldWeight in 2699, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2699)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR, 1998), the study commissioned by IFLA, brings revolutionary changes in the way we see modern computer catalogues. The catalogue is not seen as a sequence of bibliographic records and a copy of a card catalogue, but as an interconnected network of related information. Implications of the new model for the future development of catalogues are discussed. Special attention is given to access points and relationships between entities and the changes those will bring into both the formal and subject cataloguing, and authority files.
  3. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.01 
    0.013050629 = product of:
  0.026101258 = sum of:
    0.026101258 = product of:
      0.052202515 = sum of:
        0.052202515 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052202515 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15901025 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04540776 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  4. Bartolo, L.M.; Zumer, M.; Casson, R.; Holmberg, L.: ¬The ALCOM/NIST heterogeneous structures database : knowledge structure for basic and applied research in an interdisciplinary scientific collaboration (1998) 0.01 
    0.011444395 = product of:
  0.02288879 = sum of:
    0.02288879 = product of:
      0.04577758 = sum of:
        0.04577758 = weight(_text_:1998 in 41) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04577758 = score(doc=41,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.17527951 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04540776 = queryNorm
            0.26116905 = fieldWeight in 41, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=41)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Year
    1998
  5. Zumer, M.; Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Consequences of implementing FRBR : are we ready to open pandora's box? (2002) 0.01 
    0.011213172 = product of:
  0.022426344 = sum of:
    0.022426344 = product of:
      0.04485269 = sum of:
        0.04485269 = weight(_text_:1998 in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04485269 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17527951 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04540776 = queryNorm
            0.25589237 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The study Functional Requirements for Bibliograpbic Records (FRBR) was commissioned by IFLA and published in 1998. It defines the core functions of a catalogue (and bibliographic records) as a gateway to information. For that purpose an abstract entity-relationship model of a catalogue is proposed. The FRBR model is revolutionary. The (computer) catalogue is not seen as a sequence of bibliographic records and a replica of the traditional card catalogue, but rather as a network of connected entities, enabling the user to perform seamlessly all the necessary functions. So far there has been some theoretical discussion of the model and some limited experiments, but there is a lack of research in how to implement this theoretical model in practice, in new-generation catalogues. In this paper some reactions to the model are analysed. The main focus is an consequences of the model for the OPAC interface design, particularly the searching functionality and display of results.
  6. Zumer, M.: IFLA Library Reference Model (IFLA LRM)-harmonisation of the FRBR family (2018) 0.01 
    0.011213172 = product of:
  0.022426344 = sum of:
    0.022426344 = product of:
      0.04485269 = sum of:
        0.04485269 = weight(_text_:1998 in 4378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04485269 = score(doc=4378,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17527951 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04540776 = queryNorm
            0.25589237 = fieldWeight in 4378, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4378)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In 1998, the FRBR model (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) was developed under the auspices of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). The library domain finally developed its conceptual model of the bibliographic universe and thus the basis for the development of novel bibliographic information systems. In 2017, the IFLA Library Reference Model (Riva, LeBoeuf and Zumer 2017) was formally accepted as an IFLA standard. The FRBR family of models as well as LRM all start from the user tasks that need to be enabled and supported by bibliographic information systems. The consolidation process included a detailed analysis of all entities, attributes and relationships defined by the FRBR family. In this paper, the main features of the model are presented and described. With IFLA LRM, we finally have a modern model, compatible with the semantic web.
  7. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2014) 0.01 
    0.010875523 = product of:
  0.021751046 = sum of:
    0.021751046 = product of:
      0.043502092 = sum of:
        0.043502092 = weight(_text_:22 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043502092 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15901025 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04540776 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The article discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and/or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the Dewey Decimal Classification [DDC] (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
  8. Zumer, M.: Guidelines for (electronic) national bibliographies : work in progress (2005) 0.01 
    0.010766218 = product of:
  0.021532437 = sum of:
    0.021532437 = product of:
      0.043064874 = sum of:
        0.043064874 = weight(_text_:22 in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043064874 = score(doc=4346,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15901025 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04540776 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1.11.2005 18:56:22
  9. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Zumer, M.: FRBR and FRANAR : subject access (2004) 0.01 
    0.010571881 = product of:
  0.021143762 = sum of:
    0.021143762 = product of:
      0.042287525 = sum of:
        0.042287525 = weight(_text_:1998 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042287525 = score(doc=2646,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17527951 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04540776 = queryNorm
            0.24125765 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8601224 = idf(docFreq=2531, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    1. Introduction In this paper we address two questions: 1. What is the position of subject indexing in the thinking of the library world after the publication of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (1998)? 2. Is this position in accordance with the requirements of the users searching for documents about a given subject? Research Shows that searching an a topic (i.e. subject access) is an important, even predominant type of end-user searching of library catalogues and even more so of other bibliographic databases. Between one third and two thirds of all OPAC searches are probably subject searches (Large & Beheshti, 199%). Taking into account different ways in which searching an a topic is implemented in library catalogues (subject headings, classification, keywords only) the percentage may be even higher. For example title word searching may be a substitute for subject searching if no better tools are available. In the light of this it is not surprising that the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) (1998) pays attention to subject searching, as well as the Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR) (2003). Also the Statement of International Cataloguing Principles: Final draft of 19 December 2003, which is the result of the first First IFLA Meeting of Experts an an International Cataloguing Code mentiong subject access as a function of cataloguing (Statement, 2003). In this paper we discuss the ways these three documents deal with subjects.
  10. Golub, K.; Tudhope, D.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Terminology registries for knowledge organization systems : functionality, use, and attributes (2014) 0.01 
    0.009228187 = product of:
  0.018456373 = sum of:
    0.018456373 = product of:
      0.036912747 = sum of:
        0.036912747 = weight(_text_:22 in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036912747 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15901025 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04540776 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:12:54
  11. Zeng, M.L.; Gracy, K.F.; Zumer, M.: Using a semantic analysis tool to generate subject access points : a study using Panofsky's theory and two research samples (2014) 0.01 
    0.009228187 = product of:
  0.018456373 = sum of:
    0.018456373 = product of:
      0.036912747 = sum of:
        0.036912747 = weight(_text_:22 in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036912747 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15901025 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04540776 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  12. O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.; Mixter, J.: FRBR aggregates : their types and frequency in library collections (2015) 0.01 
    0.009228187 = product of:
  0.018456373 = sum of:
    0.018456373 = product of:
      0.036912747 = sum of:
        0.036912747 = weight(_text_:22 in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036912747 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15901025 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04540776 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Authors

Years

Types

Themes