Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Szostak, R."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Szostak, R.: ¬A schema for unifying human science : interdisciplinary perspectives on culture (2003) 0.03
    0.026177218 = product of:
      0.052354436 = sum of:
        0.052354436 = product of:
          0.10470887 = sum of:
            0.10470887 = weight(_text_:2003 in 803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10470887 = score(doc=803,freq=7.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.5382412 = fieldWeight in 803, product of:
                  2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
                    7.0 = termFreq=7.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=803)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    GN357 .S96 2003
    LCC
    GN357 .S96 2003
    Year
    2003
  2. Szostak, R.: Classfying scholarly theories and methods (2003) 0.03
    0.025811084 = product of:
      0.051622167 = sum of:
        0.051622167 = product of:
          0.103244334 = sum of:
            0.103244334 = weight(_text_:2003 in 2104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.103244334 = score(doc=2104,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.53071296 = fieldWeight in 2104, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2104)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 30(2003) no.1, S.20-35
    Year
    2003
  3. Szostak, R.: Speaking truth to power in classification : response to Fox's review of my work; KO 39:4, 300 (2013) 0.02
    0.01821949 = product of:
      0.03643898 = sum of:
        0.03643898 = product of:
          0.07287796 = sum of:
            0.07287796 = weight(_text_:22 in 591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07287796 = score(doc=591,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 591, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=591)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 12:35:05
  4. Szostak, R.: Skepticism and knowledge organization (2014) 0.01
    0.010628035 = product of:
      0.02125607 = sum of:
        0.02125607 = product of:
          0.04251214 = sum of:
            0.04251214 = weight(_text_:22 in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04251214 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  5. Szostak, R.: Classifying science : phenomena, data, theory, method, practice (2004) 0.01
    0.0069961557 = product of:
      0.013992311 = sum of:
        0.013992311 = product of:
          0.027984623 = sum of:
            0.027984623 = weight(_text_:2003 in 325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027984623 = score(doc=325,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.14385101 = fieldWeight in 325, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=325)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 32(2005) no.2, S.93-95 (H. Albrechtsen): "The book deals with mapping of the structures and contents of sciences, defined broadly to include the social sciences and the humanities. According to the author, the study of science, as well as the practice of science, could benefit from a detailed classification of different types of science. The book defines five universal constituents of the sciences: phenomena, data, theories, methods and practice. For each of these constituents, the author poses five questions, in the well-known 5W format: Who, What, Where, When, Why? - with the addition of the question How? (Szostak 2003). Two objectives of the author's endeavor stand out: 1) decision support for university curriculum development across disciplines and decision support for university students at advanced levels of education in selection of appropriate courses for their projects and to support cross-disciplinary inquiry for researchers and students; 2) decision support for researchers and students in scientific inquiry across disciplines, methods and theories. The main prospective audience of this book is university curriculum developers, university students and researchers, in that order of priority. The heart of the book is the chapters unfolding the author's ideas about how to classify phenomena and data, theory, method and practice, by use of the 5W inquiry model. . . .