Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Williamson, N.J."
  1. McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: Class 61 - Medicine : restructuring progress in 2003 (2003) 0.05
    0.052354436 = product of:
      0.10470887 = sum of:
        0.10470887 = product of:
          0.20941775 = sum of:
            0.20941775 = weight(_text_:2003 in 3788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20941775 = score(doc=3788,freq=7.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                1.0764824 = fieldWeight in 3788, product of:
                  2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
                    7.0 = termFreq=7.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3788)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 25(2003), S.47-64
    Year
    2003
  2. McIlwaine, I.C.; Williamson, N.J.: Class 61 - Medicine : restructuring progress 2000 (2000) 0.02
    0.02125607 = product of:
      0.04251214 = sum of:
        0.04251214 = product of:
          0.08502428 = sum of:
            0.08502428 = weight(_text_:22 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08502428 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.49-75
  3. Williamson, N.J.: Classification issues in 2011 : report (2012) 0.02
    0.01821949 = product of:
      0.03643898 = sum of:
        0.03643898 = product of:
          0.07287796 = sum of:
            0.07287796 = weight(_text_:22 in 6224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07287796 = score(doc=6224,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6224, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6224)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:17:00
  4. Williamson, N.J.: Professor Neelameghan's contribution to the advancement and development of classification in the context of knowledge organization (2006) 0.01
    0.013992311 = product of:
      0.027984623 = sum of:
        0.027984623 = product of:
          0.055969246 = sum of:
            0.055969246 = weight(_text_:2003 in 1481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055969246 = score(doc=1481,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.28770202 = fieldWeight in 1481, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1481)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a brief overview of Prof. A. Neelameghan's works/contributions more particularly to classification and knowledge organization, based on papers abstracted in Library and Information Science Abstracts and Information Science Abstracts, since the early 1960s when he joined Dr. S.R. Ranganathan at the Documentation Research and Training Centre, in Bangalore. Concludes "Following the path of Neelameghan's research and publication we get a picture of how certain aspects of knowledge organization have developed with particular emphasis on the importance and impact offaceted classification in that development. The result is an outstanding contribution to the history, development and application of the facet model developed by Ranganathan, affirmed at the Dorking Conference in 1957 and seemingly reaffirmed" in the present analysis in 2003.
  5. Williamson, N.J.: Knowledge structures and the Internet : progress and prospects (2006) 0.01
    0.010628035 = product of:
      0.02125607 = sum of:
        0.02125607 = product of:
          0.04251214 = sum of:
            0.04251214 = weight(_text_:22 in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04251214 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27.12.2008 15:56:22
  6. Williamson, N.J.: Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization, the Eleventh International ISKO Conference, Rome, 2010 (2013) 0.01
    0.010628035 = product of:
      0.02125607 = sum of:
        0.02125607 = product of:
          0.04251214 = sum of:
            0.04251214 = weight(_text_:22 in 638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04251214 = score(doc=638,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 638, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=638)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 12:09:50
  7. Williamson, N.J.: Classification Issues: Report IFLA General Conference, Oslo, Norway, 2005 : Classification and Indexing Section (2005) 0.01
    0.0069961557 = product of:
      0.013992311 = sum of:
        0.013992311 = product of:
          0.027984623 = sum of:
            0.027984623 = weight(_text_:2003 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027984623 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.14385101 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Originally, it was decided that the Dewey Second Summary (100 Divisions) would be a suitable level of access for the bibliography and that the standard DDC organization should be used. In many cases there was a good match between DDC and the former subject categories, in all fields of science and in subjects where literary warrant was high However this was not suitable throughout. Among the areas cited as problems are some of the places where UDC and DDC differ (e.g. the 800s). With respect to music, a deeper level of division than the Dewey outline was needed (specifically in 782 and 784-788 sections on printed and recorded music). In 2002 and 2003 an analysis of the distribution of documents with the 100 Divisions was conducted. Documents were not spread evenly in all classes and while some classes could be merged, others could benefit for the use of more specific numbers. Also, there were discipline based problems, for example in the melding of all branches of engineering. As well, there was a lack of correspondence with modern disciplines such as engineering, electronics, mechanical engineering and environmental technology which had been separate subject categories prior to 2004. Another troublesome discipline was archaeology. Moreover the Second Summary level introduced in 2004 proved to be too broad and would not satisfy users' bibliographic needs. In some cases, in classes containing a variety of topics, subtopics were invisible (e.g. 790 Sports, games and entertainment). As a result, beginning in 2006 the DNB will use full DDC notations. However, the problem would not be insurmountable. The authors concluded that - the cooperation was an interesting are rewarding experience. Ultimately each national - library could adjust and adapt the classification for its own needs and the work done was a good basis for further developments Further, it strengthened support for the German version of DDC to be published in 2006."