Ereshefsky, M.: ¬The poverty of the Linnaean hierarchy : a philosophical study of biological taxonomy (2007)
0.01
0.009328208 = product of:
0.018656416 = sum of:
0.018656416 = product of:
0.03731283 = sum of:
0.03731283 = weight(_text_:2003 in 2493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03731283 = score(doc=2493,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
0.044824958 = queryNorm
0.19180135 = fieldWeight in 2493, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2493)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: KO 35(2008) no.4, S.255-259 (B. Hjoerland): "This book was published in 2000 simultaneously in hardback and as an electronic resource, and, in 2007, as a paperback. The author is a professor of philosophy at the University of Calgary, Canada. He has an impressive list of contributions, mostly addressing issues in biological taxonomy such as units of evolution, natural kinds and the species concept. The book is a scholarly criticism of the famous classification system developed by the Swedish botanist Carl Linnaeus (1707-1778). This system consists of both a set of rules for the naming of living organisms (biological nomenclature) and principles of classification. Linné's system has been used and adapted by biologists over a period of almost 250 years. Under the current system of codes, it is now applied to more than two million species of organisms. Inherent in the Linnaean system is the indication of hierarchic relationships. The Linnaean system has been justified primarily on the basis of stability. Although it has been criticized and alternatives have been suggested, it still has its advocates (e.g., Schuh, 2003). One of the alternatives being developed is The International Code of Phylogenetic Nomenclature, known as the PhyloCode for short, a system that radically alters the current nomenclatural rules. The new proposals have provoked hot debate on nomenclatural issues in biology. . . ."
