Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003) 0.06
```
0.062467065 = product of:
  0.12493413 = sum of:
    0.12493413 = sum of:
      0.08849515 = weight(_text_:2003 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08849515 = score(doc=1270,freq=5.0), product of:
          0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044824958 = queryNorm
          0.45489684 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
            2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
              5.0 = termFreq=5.0
            4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
      0.03643898 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03643898 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044824958 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Content

"Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."

Source

c't. 2003, H.1, S.38

Year

2003

Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.04

0.041644707 = product of:
  0.083289415 = sum of:
    0.083289415 = sum of:
      0.058996763 = weight(_text_:2003 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.058996763 = score(doc=5171,freq=5.0), product of:
          0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044824958 = queryNorm
          0.30326456 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
            2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
              5.0 = termFreq=5.0
            4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.024292652 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024292652 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044824958 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.6, S.549-568
Year: 2003

Garfield, E.; Pudovkin, A.I.; Istomin, V.S.: Why do we need algorithmic historiography? (2003) 0.03

0.029498382 = product of:
  0.058996763 = sum of:
    0.058996763 = product of:
      0.117993526 = sum of:
        0.117993526 = weight(_text_:2003 in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.117993526 = score(doc=1606,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.6065291 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.5, S.400-412
Year: 2003

Morris, S.A.; Yen, G.; Wu, Z.; Asnake, B.: Time line visualization of research fronts (2003) 0.03

0.025811084 = product of:
  0.051622167 = sum of:
    0.051622167 = product of:
      0.103244334 = sum of:
        0.103244334 = weight(_text_:2003 in 1452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.103244334 = score(doc=1452,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.53071296 = fieldWeight in 1452, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1452)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.5, S.413-422
Year: 2003

Thelwall, M.; Harries, G.: ¬The connection between the research of a university and counts of links to its Web pages : an investigation based upon a classification of the relationships of pages to the research of the host university (2003) 0.03

0.025811084 = product of:
  0.051622167 = sum of:
    0.051622167 = product of:
      0.103244334 = sum of:
        0.103244334 = weight(_text_:2003 in 1676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.103244334 = score(doc=1676,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.53071296 = fieldWeight in 1676, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1676)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.7, S.594-602
Year: 2003

Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02

0.024292652 = product of:
  0.048585303 = sum of:
    0.048585303 = product of:
      0.097170606 = sum of:
        0.097170606 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.097170606 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 13. 7.2008 19:53:22

Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.02

0.024292652 = product of:
  0.048585303 = sum of:
    0.048585303 = product of:
      0.097170606 = sum of:
        0.097170606 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.097170606 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 7. 2.2005 14:10:22

Goenner, H.F.: ¬Das kurze Leben des S.B. Preuss (1983) 0.02

0.02332052 = product of:
  0.04664104 = sum of:
    0.04664104 = product of:
      0.09328208 = sum of:
        0.09328208 = weight(_text_:2003 in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09328208 = score(doc=4031,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.4795034 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content: Vgl. auch: c't 2003, H.1, S. 38: "Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft"

Gorraiz, J.; Schlögl, C.: Zusammenhang von Zeitschriftennachfrage und -zitationshäufigkeiten : ¬Eine bibliometrische Analyse eines Dokumentlieferdienstes am Beispiel von Subito (2003) 0.02

0.022123788 = product of:
  0.044247575 = sum of:
    0.044247575 = product of:
      0.08849515 = sum of:
        0.08849515 = weight(_text_:2003 in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08849515 = score(doc=718,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.45489684 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 50(2003) H.3, S.131-140
Year: 2003

Lin, X.; White, H.D.; Buzydlowski, J.: Real-time author co-citation mapping for online searching (2003) 0.02

0.022123788 = product of:
  0.044247575 = sum of:
    0.044247575 = product of:
      0.08849515 = sum of:
        0.08849515 = weight(_text_:2003 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08849515 = score(doc=1080,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.45489684 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Information processing and management. 39(2003) no.5, S.689-706
Year: 2003

Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02

0.021471873 = product of:
  0.042943746 = sum of:
    0.042943746 = product of:
      0.08588749 = sum of:
        0.08588749 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08588749 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 22. 7.2006 15:22:28

Hyland, K.: Self-citation and self-reference : credibility and promotion in academic publication (2003) 0.02

0.01843649 = product of:
  0.03687298 = sum of:
    0.03687298 = product of:
      0.07374596 = sum of:
        0.07374596 = weight(_text_:2003 in 5156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07374596 = score(doc=5156,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.3790807 = fieldWeight in 5156, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5156)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.3, S.251-259
Year: 2003

Vaughan, L.; Shaw , D.: Bibliographic and Web citations : what Is the difference? (2003) 0.02

0.01843649 = product of:
  0.03687298 = sum of:
    0.03687298 = product of:
      0.07374596 = sum of:
        0.07374596 = weight(_text_:2003 in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07374596 = score(doc=5176,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.3790807 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.14, S.1313-1324
Year: 2003

Czepel, R.: ¬Die Geographie der wissenschaftlichen Zitierung (2003) 0.02

0.017451478 = product of:
  0.034902956 = sum of:
    0.034902956 = product of:
      0.06980591 = sum of:
        0.06980591 = weight(_text_:2003 in 2273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06980591 = score(doc=2273,freq=7.0), product of:
            0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.35882747 = fieldWeight in 2273, product of:
              2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
                7.0 = termFreq=7.0
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2273)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Online Mitteilungen. 2003, Nr.77, S.34-36 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 56(2003) H.3/4]
Year: 2003

Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.02

0.015182908 = product of:
  0.030365815 = sum of:
    0.030365815 = product of:
      0.06073163 = sum of:
        0.06073163 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06073163 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25

González, L.; Campanario, J.M.: Structure of the impact factor of journals included in the Social Sciences Citation Index : citations from documents labeled "Editorial Material" (2007) 0.01
```
0.013992311 = product of:
  0.027984623 = sum of:
    0.027984623 = product of:
      0.055969246 = sum of:
        0.055969246 = weight(_text_:2003 in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055969246 = score(doc=75,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.28770202 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

We investigated how citations from documents labeled by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) as "editorial material" contribute to the impact factor of academic journals in which they were published. Our analysis is based on records corresponding to the documents classified by the ISI as editorial material published in journals covered by the Social Sciences Citation Index between 1999 and 2003 (50,273 records corresponding to editorial material published in 2,374 journals). The results appear to rule out widespread manipulation of the impact factor by academic journals publishing large amounts of editorial material with many citations to the journal itself as a strategy to increase the impact factor.

Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01

0.012883125 = product of:
  0.02576625 = sum of:
    0.02576625 = product of:
      0.0515325 = sum of:
        0.0515325 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0515325 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 22. 3.2009 19:22:35

Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.01

0.012146326 = product of:
  0.024292652 = sum of:
    0.024292652 = product of:
      0.048585303 = sum of:
        0.048585303 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048585303 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 17.12.2013 11:02:22

Johnson, B.; Oppenheim, C.: How socially connected are citers to those that they cite? (2007) 0.01
```
0.01166026 = product of:
  0.02332052 = sum of:
    0.02332052 = product of:
      0.04664104 = sum of:
        0.04664104 = weight(_text_:2003 in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04664104 = score(doc=839,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.2397517 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to report an investigation into the social and citation networks of three information scientists: David Nicholas, Peter Williams and Paul Huntington. Design/methodology/approach - Similarities between citation patterns and social closeness were identified and discussed. A total of 16 individuals in the citation network were identified and investigated using citation analysis, and a matrix formed of citations made between those in the network. Social connections between the 16 in the citation network were then investigated by means of a questionnaire, the results of which were merged into a separate matrix. These matrices were converted into visual social networks, using multidimensional scaling. A new deviance measure was devised for drawing comparisons between social and citation closeness in individual cases. Findings - Nicholas, Williams and Huntington were found to have cited 527 authors in the period 2000-2003, the 16 most cited becoming the subjects of further citation and social investigation. This comparison, along with the examination of visual representations indicates a positive correlation between social closeness and citation counts. Possible explanations for this correlation are discussed, and implications considered. Despite this correlation, the information scientists were found to cite widely outside their immediate social connections. Originality/value - Social network analysis has not been often used in combination with citation analysis to explore inter-relationships in research teams.
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Google book search : citation analysis for social science and the humanities (2009) 0.01
```
0.01166026 = product of:
  0.02332052 = sum of:
    0.02332052 = product of:
      0.04664104 = sum of:
        0.04664104 = weight(_text_:2003 in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04664104 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.2397517 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

In both the social sciences and the humanities, books and monographs play significant roles in research communication. The absence of citations from most books and monographs from the Thomson Reuters/Institute for Scientific Information databases (ISI) has been criticized, but attempts to include citations from or to books in the research evaluation of the social sciences and humanities have not led to widespread adoption. This article assesses whether Google Book Search (GBS) can partially fill this gap by comparing citations from books with citations from journal articles to journal articles in 10 science, social science, and humanities disciplines. Book citations were 31% to 212% of ISI citations and, hence, numerous enough to supplement ISI citations in the social sciences and humanities covered, but not in the sciences (3%-5%), except for computing (46%), due to numerous published conference proceedings. A case study was also made of all 1,923 articles in the 51 information science and library science ISI-indexed journals published in 2003. Within this set, highly book-cited articles tended to receive many ISI citations, indicating a significant relationship between the two types of citation data, but with important exceptions that point to the additional information provided by book citations. In summary, GBS is clearly a valuable new source of citation data for the social sciences and humanities. One practical implication is that book-oriented scholars should consult it for additional citations to their work when applying for promotion and tenure.

Search (33 results, page 1 of 2)

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes