Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Kaiser, M.; Lieder, H.J.; Majcen, K.; Vallant, H.: New ways of sharing and using authority information : the LEAF project (2003) 0.01
    0.010907174 = product of:
      0.021814348 = sum of:
        0.021814348 = product of:
          0.043628696 = sum of:
            0.043628696 = weight(_text_:2003 in 1166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043628696 = score(doc=1166,freq=7.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.22426717 = fieldWeight in 1166, product of:
                  2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
                    7.0 = termFreq=7.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1166)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    NACO was established in 1976 and is hosted by the Library of Congress. At the beginning of 2003, nearly 400 institutions were involved in this undertaking, including 43 institutions from outside the United States.6 Despite the enormous success of NACO and the impressive annual growth of the initiative, there are requirements for participation that form an obstacle for many institutions: they have to follow the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2) and employ the MARC217 data format. Participating institutions also have to belong to either OCLC (Online Computer Library Center) or RLG (Research Libraries Group) in order to be able to contribute records, and they have to provide a specified minimum number of authority records per year. A recent proof of concept project of the Library of Congress, OCLC and the German National Library-Virtual International Authority File (VIAF)8-will, in its first phase, test automatic linking of the records of the Library of Congress Name Authority File (LCNAF) and the German Personal Name Authority File by using matching algorithms and software developed by OCLC. The results are expected to form the basis of a "Virtual International Authority File". The project will then test the maintenance of the virtual authority file by employing the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH)9 to harvest the metadata for new, updated, and deleted records. When using the "Virtual International Authority File" a cataloguer will be able to check the system to see whether the authority record he wants to establish already exists. The final phase of the project will test possibilities for displaying records in the preferred language and script of the end user. Currently, there are still some clear limitations associated with the ways in which authority records are used by memory institutions. One of the main problems has to do with limited access: generally only large institutions or those that are part of a library network have unlimited online access to permanently updated authority records. Smaller institutions outside these networks usually have to fall back on less efficient ways of obtaining authority data, or have no access at all. Cross-domain sharing of authority data between libraries, archives, museums and other memory institutions simply does not happen at present. Public users are, by and large, not even aware that such things as name authority records exist and are excluded from access to these information resources.
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 9(2003) no.11, x S
    Year
    2003