Search (178 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003) 0.07
    0.07287824 = product of:
      0.14575648 = sum of:
        0.14575648 = sum of:
          0.103244334 = weight(_text_:2003 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.103244334 = score(doc=3837,freq=5.0), product of:
              0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044824958 = queryNorm
              0.53071296 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
                2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                  5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
          0.04251214 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04251214 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044824958 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:22:48
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.5, S.372-378
    Year
    2003
  2. Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003) 0.06
    0.062467065 = product of:
      0.12493413 = sum of:
        0.12493413 = sum of:
          0.08849515 = weight(_text_:2003 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08849515 = score(doc=4460,freq=5.0), product of:
              0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044824958 = queryNorm
              0.45489684 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
                2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                  5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
          0.03643898 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03643898 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044824958 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6.11.2005 19:02:22
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 59(2003) no.1, S.84-104
    Year
    2003
  3. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019) 0.05
    0.046204112 = product of:
      0.092408225 = sum of:
        0.092408225 = sum of:
          0.055969246 = weight(_text_:2003 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055969246 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044824958 = queryNorm
              0.28770202 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
          0.03643898 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03643898 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044824958 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A recent publication in Nature reports that public R&D funding is only weakly correlated with the citation impact of a nation's articles as measured by the field-weighted citation index (FWCI; defined by Scopus). On the basis of the supplementary data, we up-scaled the design using Web of Science data for the decade 2003-2013 and OECD funding data for the corresponding decade assuming a 2-year delay (2001-2011). Using negative binomial regression analysis, we found very small coefficients, but the effects of international collaboration are positive and statistically significant, whereas the effects of government funding are negative, an order of magnitude smaller, and statistically nonsignificant (in two of three analyses). In other words, international collaboration improves the impact of research articles, whereas more government funding tends to have a small adverse effect when comparing OECD countries.
    Date
    8. 1.2019 18:22:45
  4. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.04
    0.041644707 = product of:
      0.083289415 = sum of:
        0.083289415 = sum of:
          0.058996763 = weight(_text_:2003 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058996763 = score(doc=5171,freq=5.0), product of:
              0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044824958 = queryNorm
              0.30326456 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                  5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
          0.024292652 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024292652 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044824958 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.6, S.549-568
    Year
    2003
  5. Chen, C.: CiteSpace II : detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2006) 0.04
    0.038503427 = product of:
      0.077006854 = sum of:
        0.077006854 = sum of:
          0.04664104 = weight(_text_:2003 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04664104 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044824958 = queryNorm
              0.2397517 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
          0.030365815 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030365815 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044824958 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the latest development of a generic approach to detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. The work makes substantial theoretical and methodological contributions to progressive knowledge domain visualization. A specialty is conceptualized and visualized as a time-variant duality between two fundamental concepts in information science: research fronts and intellectual bases. A research front is defined as an emergent and transient grouping of concepts and underlying research issues. The intellectual base of a research front is its citation and co-citation footprint in scientific literature - an evolving network of scientific publications cited by research-front concepts. Kleinberg's (2002) burst-detection algorithm is adapted to identify emergent research-front concepts. Freeman's (1979) betweenness centrality metric is used to highlight potential pivotal points of paradigm shift over time. Two complementary visualization views are designed and implemented: cluster views and time-zone views. The contributions of the approach are that (a) the nature of an intellectual base is algorithmically and temporally identified by emergent research-front terms, (b) the value of a co-citation cluster is explicitly interpreted in terms of research-front concepts, and (c) visually prominent and algorithmically detected pivotal points substantially reduce the complexity of a visualized network. The modeling and visualization process is implemented in CiteSpace II, a Java application, and applied to the analysis of two research fields: mass extinction (1981-2004) and terrorism (1990-2003). Prominent trends and pivotal points in visualized networks were verified in collaboration with domain experts, who are the authors of pivotal-point articles. Practical implications of the work are discussed. A number of challenges and opportunities for future studies are identified.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:11:05
  6. Burrell, Q.L.: "Type/Token-Taken" informetrics : Some comments and further examples (2003) 0.04
    0.03687298 = product of:
      0.07374596 = sum of:
        0.07374596 = product of:
          0.14749192 = sum of:
            0.14749192 = weight(_text_:2003 in 2116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14749192 = score(doc=2116,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.7581614 = fieldWeight in 2116, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2116)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.13, S.1260-1263
    Year
    2003
  7. Wolfram, D.: Applied informetrics for information retrieval research (2003) 0.03
    0.034274023 = product of:
      0.068548046 = sum of:
        0.068548046 = product of:
          0.13709609 = sum of:
            0.13709609 = weight(_text_:2003 in 4589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13709609 = score(doc=4589,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.7047231 = fieldWeight in 4589, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4589)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Year
    2003
  8. Wettlauf der Wissenschaft (2004) 0.03
    0.030802742 = product of:
      0.061605483 = sum of:
        0.061605483 = sum of:
          0.03731283 = weight(_text_:2003 in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03731283 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044824958 = queryNorm
              0.19180135 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
          0.024292652 = weight(_text_:22 in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024292652 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044824958 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Jahrzehntelang galt die USA als Platzhirsch in der Forschungswelt. Egal ob es um Patente oder Nobelpreise ging, ihre Adressaten lebten und arbeiteten zumeist in Nordamerika. Jüngste Zahlen zeigen aber, dass diese Vormachtstellung am Bröckeln ist und Europa und vor allem Asien aufholen. Die globale US-Dominanz könnte zumindest im wissenschaftlichen Bereich bald der Vergangenheit angehören. Während in Österreich gerade die Forschungsförderung restrukturiert wird, machen sich die USA trotz rekordverdächtiger Förderbudgets Sorgen um ihre wissenschaftliche Schlagkraft. Nach einem Artikel in der NewYork Times büsst die USA ihre Führungsrolle in Forschung und Entwicklung zusehends ein. Zwar kommen weiterhin die meisten Patente aus Nordamerika, doch sank deren Anteil an den weltweit angemeldeten Patenten von 60,2% (1980) auf 51,8% (2003). Besonders erfolgreich in diesem Feld sind die asiatischen Ländern, allen voran Japan, das seinen Anteil in den letzten 20 Jahren beinahe verdoppeln konnte. Auch bei den wissenschaftlichen Publikationen holt die nicht englischsprachige WeIt auf. So sank zum Beispiel der Anteil US-amerikanischer Autoren bei Physical Reviewvon über 60% in den 80er Jahren auf unter 30% im letzten Jahr. Auch hier holen besonders Forscher aus Asien stark auf. Allein China reicht jedes Jahr über 1.000 Beiträge bei Physical Review ein, sagt Martin Blume, Herausgeber der Zeitschriften der American Physical Society. Der Anteil der USA an den jährlich vergebenen Nobelpreisen sank in den letzten 30 Jahren ebenfalls deutlich auf knapp über 50%. Asien holt auf: Während Europa die amerikanische Führungsrolle eher vorsichtig herausfordert, hat sich in Asien ein regelrechter Boom entwickelt. Die Zahl der abgeschlossenen naturwissenschaftlichen und techni schen Doktorate verdoppelte sich in Asien in nur zehn Jahren, während die Abschlüsse in Europa und den USA stagnieren oder sogar zurückgehen. Steigender Lebensstandard in den Zentren aller Weltregionen und mobilitätsfeindliche Einreisebestimmungen als Folge des "Kriegs gegen den Terror" führen auch dazu, dass Jungwissenschaftler aus China, Indien oder Taiwan nach Abschluss ihrer Ausbildung in den USA verstärkt in ihre Heimatregion zurückkehren. Die amerikanische Wirtschaft reagiert auf diesen Trend zunehmend mit der Auslagerung von Forschungseinrichtungen in diese Länder. In Zeiten der Globalisierung zeigt sich daran aber auch die Schwäche nationalstaatlich orientierter Statistiken."
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2004, Nr.79, S.22-23 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 57(2004) H.2]
  9. Garfield, E.; Pudovkin, A.I.; Istomin, V.S.: Why do we need algorithmic historiography? (2003) 0.03
    0.029498382 = product of:
      0.058996763 = sum of:
        0.058996763 = product of:
          0.117993526 = sum of:
            0.117993526 = weight(_text_:2003 in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.117993526 = score(doc=1606,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.6065291 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.5, S.400-412
    Year
    2003
  10. Huber, J.C.; Wagner-Döbler, R.: Using the Mann-Whitney test on informetric data (2003) 0.03
    0.029498382 = product of:
      0.058996763 = sum of:
        0.058996763 = product of:
          0.117993526 = sum of:
            0.117993526 = weight(_text_:2003 in 1686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.117993526 = score(doc=1686,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.6065291 = fieldWeight in 1686, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1686)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.8, S.798-801
    Year
    2003
  11. Burrell, Q.L.: Fitting Lotka's law : some cautionary observations on a recent paper by Newby et al. (2003) (2004) 0.03
    0.027984623 = product of:
      0.055969246 = sum of:
        0.055969246 = product of:
          0.11193849 = sum of:
            0.11193849 = weight(_text_:2003 in 6235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11193849 = score(doc=6235,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.57540405 = fieldWeight in 6235, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6235)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Morris, S.A.; Yen, G.; Wu, Z.; Asnake, B.: Time line visualization of research fronts (2003) 0.03
    0.025811084 = product of:
      0.051622167 = sum of:
        0.051622167 = product of:
          0.103244334 = sum of:
            0.103244334 = weight(_text_:2003 in 1452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.103244334 = score(doc=1452,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.53071296 = fieldWeight in 1452, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1452)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.5, S.413-422
    Year
    2003
  13. Chen, C.; Kuljis, J.: ¬The rising landscape : a visual exploration of superstring revolutions in physics (2003) 0.03
    0.025811084 = product of:
      0.051622167 = sum of:
        0.051622167 = product of:
          0.103244334 = sum of:
            0.103244334 = weight(_text_:2003 in 1469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.103244334 = score(doc=1469,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.53071296 = fieldWeight in 1469, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1469)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.5, S.435-446
    Year
    2003
  14. Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.; LaBarre, K.: ¬A cast of thousands : Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy (2003) 0.03
    0.025811084 = product of:
      0.051622167 = sum of:
        0.051622167 = product of:
          0.103244334 = sum of:
            0.103244334 = weight(_text_:2003 in 1731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.103244334 = score(doc=1731,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.53071296 = fieldWeight in 1731, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1731)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.9, S.855-871
    Year
    2003
  15. Faba-Pérez, C.; Guerrero-Bote, V.P.; Moya-Anegón, F.: "Sitation" distributions and Bradford's law in a closed Web space (2003) 0.03
    0.025811084 = product of:
      0.051622167 = sum of:
        0.051622167 = product of:
          0.103244334 = sum of:
            0.103244334 = weight(_text_:2003 in 4447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.103244334 = score(doc=4447,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.53071296 = fieldWeight in 4447, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4447)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 59(2003) no.5, S.558-580
    Year
    2003
  16. Ohly, H.P.: ¬Die Bibliometrie ist tot - es lebe die Bibliometrie (2003) 0.02
    0.024735143 = product of:
      0.049470287 = sum of:
        0.049470287 = product of:
          0.09894057 = sum of:
            0.09894057 = weight(_text_:2003 in 2030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09894057 = score(doc=2030,freq=9.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.5085901 = fieldWeight in 2030, product of:
                  3.0 = tf(freq=9.0), with freq of:
                    9.0 = termFreq=9.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2030)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Vom 5. bis 7. November 2003 findet auf Initiative und in der Verantwortung der Zentralbibliothek des Forschungszentrums Jülich die Konferenz "Bibliometric Analysis in Science and Research" statt: Bibliometrische Indikatoren, Bibliomefrisches Mapping, Webmetrie und Forschungspolitik stehen auf dem Programm. Nach einer Phase der Beruhigung auf dem Bibliometriesektor scheint dieses Forschungsfeld nun von der Bibliothekswissenschaft wieder eine Belebung zu erfahren. Vor allem in den 80erJahren wurden Gesetze von Bradford, Lotka und Zipf heiß diskutiert. Halbwertszeiten, Forschungsfronten und Kernzeitschriften sind Dank der Datenbanken des ISI problemlos aufzuspüren und werden gerne zur Selbstbespiegelung der Wissenschaft benutzt (Diodalo 1994). Die Zeitschrifen Scientometrics und die JASIST belegen, dass die mathematischen Modellierungen auf diesem Gebiet noch immer nicht an ihre Grenzen gestoßen sind. Und Vereinigungen wie die Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftsforschung oder die ISSI und deren Diskussionsliste oder Sigmetrics zeigen, dass nach wie vor eine starke Community auf diesem Gebiet aktiv ist. Andererseits hat der Begriff Bibliometrie ein wenig von seinem schillernden Glanz verloren und wird gerne durch Mapping, Cybermetrics (gleichnamig das "International Journal of Scientometrics, Informetrics and Bibliometrics"), Information Mining und anders in modernere Kontexte gesetzt (Park/Thelwall 2003). War es das relativierende Wissenschaftsverständnis, der Wegfall der konkurrierenden politischen Systeme oder die stürmische Medienentwicklung in der Wissenschaft, welche die Bibliometrie aus der Bibliotheks- und Informationsdiskussion vorübergehend verschwinden ließ?
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 6(2003) H.3, S.261-262
    Year
    2003
  17. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.02
    0.024292652 = product of:
      0.048585303 = sum of:
        0.048585303 = product of:
          0.097170606 = sum of:
            0.097170606 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.097170606 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
  18. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02
    0.024292652 = product of:
      0.048585303 = sum of:
        0.048585303 = product of:
          0.097170606 = sum of:
            0.097170606 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.097170606 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  19. Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987) 0.02
    0.024292652 = product of:
      0.048585303 = sum of:
        0.048585303 = product of:
          0.097170606 = sum of:
            0.097170606 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.097170606 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
  20. Bar-Ilan, J.; Peritz, B.C.: Evolution, continuity, and disappearance of documents on a specific topic an the Web : a longitudinal study of "informetrics" (2004) 0.02
    0.023086136 = product of:
      0.046172272 = sum of:
        0.046172272 = product of:
          0.092344545 = sum of:
            0.092344545 = weight(_text_:2003 in 2886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.092344545 = score(doc=2886,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.47468412 = fieldWeight in 2886, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2886)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The present paper analyzes the changes that occurred to a set of Web pages related to "informetrics" over a period of 5 years between June 1998 and June 2003. Four times during this time span, in 1998,1999, 2002, and 2003, we monitored previously located pages and searched for new ones related to the topic. Thus, we were able to study the growth of the topic, white analyzing the rates of change and disappearance. The results indicate that modification, disappearance, and resurfacing cannot be ignored when studying the structure and development of the Web.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 163
  • d 14
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 174
  • m 4
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…