Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × type_ss:"m"
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Weitz, J.: Cataloger's judgment : music cataloging questions and answers from the music OCLC users group newsletter (2003) 0.09
    0.08748919 = product of:
      0.17497838 = sum of:
        0.17497838 = sum of:
          0.11424675 = weight(_text_:2003 in 4591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11424675 = score(doc=4591,freq=3.0), product of:
              0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044824958 = queryNorm
              0.5872693 = fieldWeight in 4591, product of:
                1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                  3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4591)
          0.06073163 = weight(_text_:22 in 4591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06073163 = score(doc=4591,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044824958 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4591, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4591)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25.11.2005 18:22:29
    Year
    2003
  2. Haller, K.; Popst, H.: Katalogisierung nach den RAK-WB : eine Einführung in die Regeln für die alphabetische Katalogisierung in wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken (2003) 0.04
    0.043744594 = product of:
      0.08748919 = sum of:
        0.08748919 = sum of:
          0.057123374 = weight(_text_:2003 in 1811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057123374 = score(doc=1811,freq=3.0), product of:
              0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044824958 = queryNorm
              0.29363465 = fieldWeight in 1811, product of:
                1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                  3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1811)
          0.030365815 = weight(_text_:22 in 1811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030365815 = score(doc=1811,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044824958 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1811, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1811)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 6.2015 15:22:06
    Year
    2003
  3. Pfleger, C.: ¬Die Didaktik des Fernunterrichts in Formalerschließung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Lernprogrammen (2003) 0.04
    0.03687298 = product of:
      0.07374596 = sum of:
        0.07374596 = product of:
          0.14749192 = sum of:
            0.14749192 = weight(_text_:2003 in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14749192 = score(doc=4644,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.7581614 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch den Artikel in: Bibliotheksdienst 37(2003) H.8/9, S.1088-1109
    Year
    2003
  4. Erich, A.; Tirziman, E.: Catalogarea standardizata a documentelor monografice : reguli de aplicare a ISBD(M): indrumar practic de seminar (2003) 0.03
    0.034274023 = product of:
      0.068548046 = sum of:
        0.068548046 = product of:
          0.13709609 = sum of:
            0.13709609 = weight(_text_:2003 in 4134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13709609 = score(doc=4134,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.7047231 = fieldWeight in 4134, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Year
    2003
  5. Managing cataloging and the organization of information : philosophies, practices and challenges at the onset of the 21st century (2000) 0.03
    0.03371417 = product of:
      0.06742834 = sum of:
        0.06742834 = sum of:
          0.046172272 = weight(_text_:2003 in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046172272 = score(doc=238,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044824958 = queryNorm
              0.23734206 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
          0.02125607 = weight(_text_:22 in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02125607 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044824958 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in ZfBB 51(2004) H.1, S.54-55 (G. Pflug): "Unter dem wachsenden Einfluss der Informationstechnologie auf den Bibliotheksbereich nimmt die Katalogisierung eine Schlüsselstellung ein. Das vorliegende Werk gliedert sich in zwei Teile. Der erste Abschnitt ist mit »National Libraries« überschrieben, befasst sich jedoch nur mit der Library of Congress und der National Library of Canada. Ihm folgen Artikel über »Libraries around the world«. Dabei fälltjedoch auf, dass diese Studien zwar Bibliotheken in Großbritannien, Australien, Mittel- und Südamerika und selbst Afrika (Botswana) behandeln, nicht jedoch aus Kontinentaleuropa, trotz entsprechender Aktivitäten etwa in den Niederlanden, in Frankreich oder den deutschsprachigen Ländern. Nur DOBIS/LIBIS wird erwähnt, aber nur, weil es für kurze Zeit die kanadische Entwicklung beeinflusst hat. Im zweiten Teil kommen Katalogisierungsfachleute aus vier Spezial- und neun akademischen Bibliotheken - ausschließlich aus Nordamerika und Großbritannien - zu Wort. So enthält das Werk in 22 Beispielen Berichte über individuelle und regionale Lösungen. Dabei steht die Frage im Vordergrund, zu welchen Änderungen in der Katalogisierungs- und Sacherschließungspraxis die neuen elektronischen Techniken geführt haben. So streben z.B. die englischen Hochschulbibliotheken ein koordiniertes System an. Mit dem Übergang der British Library zu MARC 21 wird das Katalogsystem in Großbritannien nachhaltig beeinflusst - um nur zwei nahe liegende Beispiele zu nennen. Insgesamt werden drei Aspekte behandelt, die Automatisierungstechnik; die dabei einzusetzende Kooperation und das Outsourcing - nicht nur durch Übernahme von Daten anderer Bibliotheken oder durch Verbundsysteme, vor allem der Library of Congress, sondern auch durch Buchhandelsfirmen wie Blackwell North America Authority Control Service. In der Frage der Sacherschließung befassen sich die Beiträge mit den im amerikanischen Bereich üblichen Klassifikationssystemen, vor allem der Colon Classification, Dewey in seinen beiden Formen oder der Library of Congress Classification. Für die deutsche Diskussion sind diese Aspekte vor allem wegen des Übergangs der Deutschen Bibliothek in ihrer Nationalbibliografie zur DDC von großem Interesse (vgl. Magda Heiner-Freiling: Die DDC in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie. In Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 15. 2003, Nr. 3, S. 8-13). Doch stellen auch die unterschiedlichen Überlegungen zur alphabetischen Katalogisierung, verbunden mit den da zugehörigen Datenbanken, einen interessanten Beitrag zur augenblicklichen Diskussion in Deutschland dar, da auch hier seit einigen Jahren die Katalogisierung nach RAK und ihre Ablösung eine lebhafte Diskussion ausgelöst hat, wie unter anderem der zusammenfassende Beitrag von Elisabeth Niggemann in: Dialog mit Bibliotheken (15. 2003, Nr. 2, S. 4-8) zeigt. Auch die angloamerikanischen und die mit ihnen zum Beispiel in Mexiko, Südamerika oder Australien verbundenen Bibliotheken - das zeigt das Buch deutlich - diskutieren die Frage der alphabetischen Katalogisierung kontrovers. So werden z.B. neben den dominanten AACR-Regeln mit ihrer Weiterentwicklung mehr als zehn andere Katalogisierungssysteme und rund 20 Online-Datenbanken behandelt. Damit liefert das Buch für die Diskussion in Deutschland und die anstehenden Entscheidungen in seiner Grundtendenz wie in den unterschiedlichen-auch widersprüchlichen-Aspekten dereinzelnen Beiträge wertvolle Anregungen."
  6. Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001) 0.02
    0.01821949 = product of:
      0.03643898 = sum of:
        0.03643898 = product of:
          0.07287796 = sum of:
            0.07287796 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07287796 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
  7. Olson, N.B.: Cataloging computer files (1992) 0.02
    0.015182908 = product of:
      0.030365815 = sum of:
        0.030365815 = product of:
          0.06073163 = sum of:
            0.06073163 = weight(_text_:22 in 7631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06073163 = score(doc=7631,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7631, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7631)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.4, S.72 (R. Templeton); Technical services quarterly 11(1994) no.3, S.91-92 (P. Holzenberg)
  8. Seminario FRBR : Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: reguisiti funzionali per record bibliografici, Florence, 27-28 January 2000, Proceedings (2000) 0.02
    0.015182908 = product of:
      0.030365815 = sum of:
        0.030365815 = product of:
          0.06073163 = sum of:
            0.06073163 = weight(_text_:22 in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06073163 = score(doc=3948,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2005 12:54:22
  9. Historical aspects of cataloging and classification (2003) 0.01
    0.011424675 = product of:
      0.02284935 = sum of:
        0.02284935 = product of:
          0.0456987 = sum of:
            0.0456987 = weight(_text_:2003 in 4058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0456987 = score(doc=4058,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.23490772 = fieldWeight in 4058, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4058)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Year
    2003
  10. Read, J.: Cataloguing without tears : managing knowledge in the information society (2003) 0.01
    0.011424675 = product of:
      0.02284935 = sum of:
        0.02284935 = product of:
          0.0456987 = sum of:
            0.0456987 = weight(_text_:2003 in 4509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0456987 = score(doc=4509,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.23490772 = fieldWeight in 4509, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Year
    2003
  11. IFLA Cataloguing Principles : steps towards an International Cataloguing Code. Report from the 1st Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code, Frankfurt 2003 (2004) 0.01
    0.011424675 = product of:
      0.02284935 = sum of:
        0.02284935 = product of:
          0.0456987 = sum of:
            0.0456987 = weight(_text_:2003 in 2312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0456987 = score(doc=2312,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.23490772 = fieldWeight in 2312, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2312)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 31(2004) no.4, S.255-257: (P. Riva): "Cataloguing standardization at the international level can be viewed as proceeding in a series of milestone conferences. This meeting, the first in a series which will cover different regions of the world, will take its place in that progression. The first IFLA Meeting of Experts an an International Cataloguing Code (IME ICC), held July 28-30, 2003 at Die Deutsche Bibliothek in Frankfurt, gathered representatives of almost all European countries as well as three of the four AACR author countries. As explained in the introduction by Barbara Tillett, chair of the IME ICC planning committee, the plan is for five meetings in total. Subsequent meetings are to take place in Buenos Aires, Argentina (held August 17-18, 2004) for Latin America and the Carribean, to be followed by Alexandria, Egypt (2005) for the Middle East, Seoul, South Korea (2006) for Asia, and Durban, South Africa (2007) for Africa. The impetus for planning these meetings was triggered by the 40th anniversary of the Paris Principles, approved at the International Conference an Cataloguing Principles held in 1961. Many will welcome the timely publication of the reports and papers from this important conference in book form. The original conference website (details given an p. 176) which includes most of the same material, is still extant, but the reports and papers gathered into this volume will be referred to by cataloguing rule makers long after the web as we know it has transformed itself into a new (and quite possibly not backwards compatible) environment.
    The book is organized into four sections: introduction and results; presentation papers; background papers; and an appendix. The introduction by Barbara Tillett serves as a summary and report of the IME ICC meeting itself. The statement of the purpose of the meeting bears reporting in full (p. 6): "The goal for this meeting was to increase the ability to share cataloguing information worldwide by promoting standards for the content of bibliographic records and authority records used in library catalogues." The next item is a report summarizing the cataloguing Code comparisons prepared prior to the conference. As a mechanism for discussion, 18 codes were compared with the Paris Principles, the extent of compliance or divergence noted and discussed by representatives from the respective rule-making bodies. During the meeting the presentation of the comparisons took up half of the first day, but for the detailed responses one must return to the IME ICC website. The published summary is very dense, and difficult to follow if one is not very familiar with the Paris Principles or the codes being compared. The main outcome of the meeting follows, this is the Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (draft, as approved Dec. 19, 2003 by IME ICC participants), accompanied by a useful Glossary. The most important eontribution of this volume is to serve as the permanent and official record of the Statement as it stands after the first IME ICC meeting. Subsequent meetings will surely suggest modifications and enhancements, but this version of the Statement needs to be widely read and commented on. To this end the website also makes available translations of the Statement into 15 European languages, and the glossary into four languages. Compared to the Paris Principles, this statement covers some familiar ground in the choice of access points and forms of names, but its overall scope is broader, explicitly referring to the role of authority records, entities in bibliographic records and relationships. It concludes with an appendix of "Objectives for the construction of cataloguing codes."
    The section of background papers starts most appropriately by reprinting the Statement of Principles from the 1961 Paris Conference and continues with another twelve papers of varying lengths, most written specifically for the IME ICC. For the published report the papers have been organized to follow the order of topics assigned to the Tive working groups: Working Group 1 Personal names; WG2 Corporate bodies; WG3 Seriality; WG4 Multivolume/multipart structures; and WG5 Uniform titles, GMDs. Pino Buizza and Mauro Guerrini co-author a substantial paper "Author and title access point control: On the way national bibliographic agencies face the issue forty years after the Paris Principles," which was first presented in Italian at the November 2002 workshop an Cataloguing and Authority Control in Rome. Issues that remain unresolved are which name or title to adopt, which form of the name or title, and which entry word to select, while choice of headings has become more uniform. The impact of catalogue language (meaning both the language of the cataloguing agency and of the majority of users of the catalogue) an these choices is explored by examining the headings used in ten national authority files for a full range of names, personal and corporate. The reflections presented are both practical and grounded in theory. Mauro Guerrini, assisted by Pino Buizza and Lucia Sardo, contributes a further new paper "Corporate bodies from ICCP up to 2003," which is an excellent survey of the surprisingly controversial issue of corporate bodies as authors, starting with Panizzi, Jewett, Cutter, Dziatzko, Fumagalli, and Lubetzky, through the debate at the Paris Conference, to the views of Verona, Domanovszky and Carpenter, and work under the auspices of IFLA an the Form and structure of corporate headings (FSCH) project and its Rvew, as well as a look at the archival standard ISAAR(CPF). This paper is the only one to have a comprehensive bibliography.
    RSWK
    Alphabetische Katalogisierung / Standardisierung / Internationale Kooperation / Kongress / Frankfurt <Main, 2003>
    Subject
    Alphabetische Katalogisierung / Standardisierung / Internationale Kooperation / Kongress / Frankfurt <Main, 2003>
  12. Electronic cataloging : AACR2 and metadata for serials and monographs (2003) 0.01
    0.00999659 = product of:
      0.01999318 = sum of:
        0.01999318 = product of:
          0.03998636 = sum of:
            0.03998636 = weight(_text_:2003 in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03998636 = score(doc=3082,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.20554425 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Year
    2003
  13. Anglo-Amerikanische Katalogisierungsregeln : Deutsche Übersetzung der Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, Second edition, 1998 Revision, einschließlich der Änderungen und Ergänzungen bis März 2001 (2002) 0.01
    0.009328208 = product of:
      0.018656416 = sum of:
        0.018656416 = product of:
          0.03731283 = sum of:
            0.03731283 = weight(_text_:2003 in 4601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03731283 = score(doc=4601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.19180135 = fieldWeight in 4601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Biblbiothek: Forschung und Praxis 27(2003) H.1-2, S.125-127 (K. Haller)
  14. Coyle, K.: FRBR, before and after : a look at our bibliographic models (2016) 0.01
    0.007591454 = product of:
      0.015182908 = sum of:
        0.015182908 = product of:
          0.030365815 = sum of:
            0.030365815 = weight(_text_:22 in 2786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030365815 = score(doc=2786,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2786, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2786)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    12. 2.2016 16:22:58
  15. Schrettinger, M.: Handbuch der Bibliothek-Wissenschaft besonders zum Gebrauch der Nicht-Bibliothekare, welche ihre Privat-Büchersammlungen selbst einrichten wollen : Auch als Leitfaden zu Vorlesungen über die Bibliothek-Wissenschaft zu gebrauchen (2003) 0.01
    0.007140422 = product of:
      0.014280844 = sum of:
        0.014280844 = product of:
          0.028561687 = sum of:
            0.028561687 = weight(_text_:2003 in 3029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028561687 = score(doc=3029,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.14681733 = fieldWeight in 3029, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3029)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Year
    2003
  16. Encoded archival description on the Internet (2002) 0.01
    0.0069961557 = product of:
      0.013992311 = sum of:
        0.013992311 = product of:
          0.027984623 = sum of:
            0.027984623 = weight(_text_:2003 in 1716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027984623 = score(doc=1716,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.14385101 = fieldWeight in 1716, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1716)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 54(2003) no.9, S.909-910 (D.A. Stirling): "Archival description enjoys a long history of use. As most readers know, archives differ from libraries relative to the nature of materials held in those respective repositories. Methods of archival description of hardcopy documents are well established; however, encoded archival description (EAD) an the Internet is relatively new, with the first version released in 1998 by the Society of American Archivists and the Library of Congress Network Development & MARC Standards Office. This book provides an accounting of EAD an the Internet in an anthology format, presenting ten essays by single and multiple authors. As descrbbnd by the two editors, "the papers in this volume are intended to provide an introduction to archival description and EAD. . and its impact and potential impact an users and reference Services" (p. 4). The first two essays provide a detailed introduction to EAD an the Internet. The first essay, "Archival Description: Content and Context in Search of Structure," reviews the basic concepts of EAD and is relatively basic, including standard definitions of related archival principles. The second essay, "The Development and Structure of the Encoded Archival Description Document Type Definition," continues the introductory thread and expands the introduction to focus an the function and Structure of traditional paper-based archival finding aids and their application to the electronic archival environment. The third essay, "Stargazing: Locating EAD in the Descriptive Firmament," delves into the technical Structure of EAD, focusing an it as a communication tool and data structure standard. The author also writes about an EAD compatriot, the International Council an Archives' adoption in 1993 of the Ad Hoc Commission an Descriptive Standards. The fourth essay, "Archival Cataloging and the Internet: The Implications and Impact of EAD," is the first introduction in the anthology to the use of EAD and the Internet. Although EAD is thought by some to negate the need for MARC, the author speaks to the efficacy of EAD in the hyperlinked world of the Internet. Of particular interest is that the EAD environment enables contextualized search capabilities.
  17. Intner, S.S.; Lazinger, S.S.; Weihs, J.: Metadata and its impact on libraries (2005) 0.01
    0.006596039 = product of:
      0.013192078 = sum of:
        0.013192078 = product of:
          0.026384156 = sum of:
            0.026384156 = weight(_text_:2003 in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026384156 = score(doc=339,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.13562404 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST. 58(2007) no.6., S.909-910 (A.D. Petrou): "A division in metadata definitions for physical objects vs. those for digital resources offered in Chapter 1 is punctuated by the use of broader, more inclusive metadata definitions, such as data about data as well as with the inclusion of more specific metadata definitions intended for networked resources. Intertwined with the book's subject matter, which is to "distinguish traditional cataloguing from metadata activity" (5), the authors' chosen metadata definition is also detailed on page 5 as follows: Thus while granting the validity of the inclusive definition, we concentrate primarily on metadata as it is most commonly thought of both inside and outside of the library community, as "structured information used to find, access, use and manage information resources primarily in a digital environment." (International Encyclopedia of Information and Library Science, 2003) Metadata principles discussed by the authors include modularity, extensibility, refinement and multilingualism. The latter set is followed by seven misconceptions about metadata. Two types of metadata discussed are automatically generated indexes and manually created records. In terms of categories of metadata, the authors present three sets of them as follows: descriptive, structural, and administrative metadata. Chapter 2 focuses on metadata for communities of practice, and is a prelude to content in Chapter 3 where metadata applications, use, and development are presented from the perspective of libraries. Chapter 2 discusses the emergence and impact of metadata on organization and access of online resources from the perspective of communities for which such standards exist and for the need for mapping one standard to another. Discussion focuses on metalanguages, such as Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) and eXtensible Markup Language (XML), "capable of embedding descriptive elements within the document markup itself' (25). This discussion falls under syntactic interoperability. For semantic interoperability, HTML and other mark-up languages, such as Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) and Computer Interchange of Museum Information (CIMI), are covered. For structural interoperability, Dublin Core's 15 metadata elements are grouped into three areas: content (title, subject, description, type, source, relation, and coverage), intellectual property (creator, publisher, contributor and rights), and instantiation (date, format, identifier, and language) for discussion.
    Chapter 8 discusses issues of archiving and preserving digital materials. The chapter reiterates, "What is the point of all of this if the resources identified and catalogued are not preserved?" (Gorman, 2003, p. 16). Discussion about preservation and related issues is organized in five sections that successively ask why, what, who, how, and how much of the plethora of digital materials should be archived and preserved. These are not easy questions because of media instability and technological obsolescence. Stakeholders in communities with diverse interests compete in terms of which community or representative of a community has an authoritative say in what and how much get archived and preserved. In discussing the above-mentioned questions, the authors once again provide valuable information and lessons from a number of initiatives in Europe, Australia, and from other global initiatives. The Draft Charter on the Preservation of the Digital Heritage and the Guidelines for the Preservation of Digital Heritage, both published by UNESCO, are discussed and some of the preservation principles from the Guidelines are listed. The existing diversity in administrative arrangements for these new projects and resources notwithstanding, the impact on content produced for online reserves through work done in digital projects and from the use of metadata and the impact on levels of reference services and the ensuing need for different models to train users and staff is undeniable. In terms of education and training, formal coursework, continuing education, and informal and on-the-job training are just some of the available options. The intensity in resources required for cataloguing digital materials, the questions over the quality of digital resources, and the threat of the new digital environment to the survival of the traditional library are all issues quoted by critics and others, however, who are concerned about a balance for planning and resources allocated for traditional or print-based resources and newer digital resources. A number of questions are asked as part of the book's conclusions in Chapter 10. Of these questions, one that touches on all of the rest and upon much of the book's content is the question: What does the future hold for metadata in libraries? Metadata standards are alive and well in many communities of practice, as Chapters 2-6 have demonstrated. The usefulness of metadata continues to be high and innovation in various elements should keep information professionals engaged for decades to come. There is no doubt that metadata have had a tremendous impact in how we organize information for access and in terms of who, how, when, and where contact is made with library services and collections online. Planning and commitment to a diversity of metadata to serve the plethora of needs in communities of practice are paramount for the continued success of many digital projects and for online preservation of our digital heritage."
  18. Hauke, P. (Bearb.): RAK versus AACR : Projekte - Prognosen - Perspektiven. Beiträge zur aktuellen Regelwerksdiskussion. (2002) 0.01
    0.00583013 = product of:
      0.01166026 = sum of:
        0.01166026 = product of:
          0.02332052 = sum of:
            0.02332052 = weight(_text_:2003 in 1729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02332052 = score(doc=1729,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.11987585 = fieldWeight in 1729, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1729)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: BuB 55(2003) H.4, S.259-260 (B. Rohde): "»Nikolausbeschluss« - ein recht untypischer Fachausdruck im Bibliothekswesen. Dennoch gibt es sicherlich nur wenige Personen in den wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken Deutschlands, die mit diesem Begriff nichts anzufangen wissen. »Der Standardisierungsausschuss strebt grundsätzlich einen Umstieg von den deutschen auf internationale Regelwerke und Formate (AACR und MARC) an«, entschied das dem Hause Der Deutschen Bibliothek angegliederte nationale Gremium für Regelwerksfragen am 6. Dezember 2001. Der geplante Umstieg vom derzeitigen nationalen Datenformat MAB und Regelwerk RAK auf das aus dem angloamerikanischen Raum stammende MARC-Datenformat (Machine Readable Cataloging) sowie das Katalogregelwerk AACR (Anglo-American Cataloging Rules), derzeit in der 1988 revidierten zweiten Ausgabe vorliegend, wurde letztes Jahr wie kein anderesThema auf breiter Basis diskutiert. Eine Gruppe Studierender am Institut für Bibliothekswissenschaft der Humboldt-Universität Berlin hat nun diese Diskussion aufgegriffen. In ihrem Publikationsprojekt unter der Leitung der Herausgeberin Petra Hauke ist es ihnen gelungen, Vertreter der unterschiedlichsten Meinungen zum Thema » RAK versus AACR« als Autoren für Einzelbeiträge in diesem Sammelband zu gewinnen. - Sachliche Diskussion - Wer die Diskussion verfolgt hat, weiß einen Teil der Autoren einer entsprechenden Meinungsfraktion ohne weiteres zuzuordnen. Die Diskussion ist auch mit Beteiligung einiger der Autoren in den fachspezifischen Mailinglisten tagesaktuell teilweise sehr heftig geführt worden. Mitunter sind die Beiträge auch durch Veröffentlichung an anderer Stelle oder durch Vorträge bereit bekannt gewesen und haben für diesen Band eine Oberarbeitung erfahren. Wenn auch der Begriff »versus« aus dem Titel den recht deutlichen emotionalen Frontverlauf zwischen Gegnern und Befürwortern des geplanten Umstiegs einfängt, so finden sich doch die Vertreter der verschiedensten Meinungsrichtungen auf einer sachlichen Ebene in diesem Buch wieder. Insofern kann es zum Verständnis der jeweiligen Gegenseite beitragen, ebenso wie zur Meinungsbildung bei Personen, die sich mit diesem Thema noch nicht intensiv beschäftigt haben. Quasi als »Repräsentantinnen« Der Deutschen Bibliothek und damit des Standardisierungsausschusses als beschlussfassendes Gremium zeigen Renate Gömpel und Gudrun Henze im einführenden Beitrag in erster Linie auf entwicklungsgeschichtlicher Ebene die Unterschiede und Gemeinsamkeiten beider Regelwerke auf. Die Vorgeschichte des Umstiegsbeschlusses wird ebenfalls nachgezeichnet sowie ein Ausblick auf die weitere Planung gegeben. Auch führt das Autorinnenduo Gründe auf, die aus Sicht Der Deutschen Bibliothek für einen Umstieg sprechen. Tatsächlich hat Die Deutsche Bibliothek als größter nationaler Datenlieferant sicherlich auch das größte Interesse an einem Umstieg aus wirtschaftlichen Gründen. Zur bisherigen Umstiegsdiskussion hat Bernhard Eversberg durch seine Online-Umfrage der breiten Bibliotheksbasis Gehör verschafft. In seiner »Theorie der Bibliothekskataloge und Suchmaschinen« erarbeitet er die gemeinsamen und unterschiedlichen Grundlagen dieser beiden Suchwerkzeuge. Er weist hierbei auch auf die Bedeutung des Datenformates hin, das getrennt von den Regelwerken zu betrachten sei. Besondere Aufmerksamkeit verdient auch der Beitrag von Luise Hoffmann; das Projekt der Machbarkeitsstudie zum Umstieg von Seiten Der Deutschen Bibliothek liegt in ihren Händen. In ihrem Beitrag hat sie die verantwortungsvolle Aufgabe übernommen, die beiden Regelwerke aufgrund ihrer inneren Struktur zu vergleichen. Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede im Aufbau, bei den Bestimmungen für Haupt- und Nebeneinträge sowie den Ansetzungsregeln von Personen und Körperschaften kommen hier nicht zu kurz. Ihr Versuch, »Vorurteile abzubauen und die Gemeinsamkeiten der Regelwerke hervorzuheben«, trägt sehr dazu bei, dem strikten »versus« die Spitze zu nehmen.
  19. Education for library cataloging : international perspectives (2006) 0.01
    0.005367968 = product of:
      0.010735936 = sum of:
        0.010735936 = product of:
          0.021471873 = sum of:
            0.021471873 = weight(_text_:22 in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021471873 = score(doc=207,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    025.3/071 22
    DDC
    025.3/071 22
  20. Viswanathan, C.G.: Cataloguing:theory & practice (2007) 0.01
    0.0053140176 = product of:
      0.010628035 = sum of:
        0.010628035 = product of:
          0.02125607 = sum of:
            0.02125607 = weight(_text_:22 in 1475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02125607 = score(doc=1475,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1475, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1475)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: 1. Library Catalogue : Its Nature, Factions, and Importance in a Library System 2. History of Modern Library Catalogues 3. Catalogue Codes: Origin, Growth and Development 4. Principles of Planning and Provision of the Library Catalogue 5.Catalogue Entries and their Functions in Achieving the Objectives of the Library Catalogue 6.Descriptive Cataloguing 7. Physical Forms of the Catalogue-I Manual Catalogues 8. Physical Forms of the Catalogues-II Computerised Cataloges 9. Varieties of Catalogues, their Scope and Functions 10. Subject Cataloguing 11. Cataloguing Department: Organization and Administration. 12. Cost Analysis of Cataloguing Procedures and Suggested Economies 13. Co-operation and Centralization in Cataloguing 14. Union Catalogues and Subject Specialisation 15. Cataloguing of Special Material 16. Arrangement, Filing, Guiding of catalogue and Instructions for its Use 17. Education and Training of Cataloguers 18.Documentation : An Extension of Cataloguing and Classification Applied to Isolates 19.Catalogue Cards, Their Style and Reproduction Methods 20. Work of Personal Authors 21. Choice and Entry of Personal Names 22. Works of Corporate Authors 23. Legal Publications 24. Choice of Headings for Corporate Bodies 25. Works of Unknown Authorship : Entry under Uniform Titles 26. Acces Points to Books and Meta- Books by A-ACR2 27. AACR2 1988 revision : Choice of Access Points to Name Headings and Uniform Titles 28. Added Entries Other Than Subject Entries 29. Subject Entries 30. Analytiacal Entries 31. Series Note and Series Entry 32. Contents, Notes and Annotation 33. References 34. Display of Entries Appendix-I Select Aids and Guides for the Cataloguer Appendix-II Definitions of Terms Commonly used in Cataloguing Appendix-III Cataloguing Examination: Select Questions Appendix-IV Implications of the adoption of A-ACR2

Languages