Search (689 results, page 1 of 35)

0.057795722 = product of:
  0.115591444 = sum of:
    0.115591444 = sum of:
      0.079152465 = weight(_text_:2003 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.079152465 = score(doc=2945,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044824958 = queryNorm
          0.4068721 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
      0.03643898 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03643898 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044824958 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)

0.053395435 = product of:
  0.10679087 = sum of:
    0.10679087 = product of:
      0.42716348 = sum of:
        0.42716348 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.42716348 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3800265 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.046204112 = product of:
  0.092408225 = sum of:
    0.092408225 = sum of:
      0.055969246 = weight(_text_:2003 in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055969246 = score(doc=4560,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044824958 = queryNorm
          0.28770202 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
      0.03643898 = weight(_text_:22 in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03643898 = score(doc=4560,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044824958 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In this article, several procedures (e.g., measurements, information retrieval analyses, power law, association rules, hierarchical clustering) are introduced which were made on a pilot digital library. Information retrievals of web users from 01/01/2003 to 01/01/2006 on the internal search engine of the pilot digital library have been analyzed. With the power law method of data processing, a constant information retrieval pattern has been established, stable over a longer period of time. After this, the data have been analyzed. On the basis of the accomplished measurements and analyses, a series of mental models of web users for global (educational) purposes have been developed (e.g., the metamodel of thought hierarchy of web users, the segmentation model of web users), and the users were profiled in four different groups (adventurers, observers, applicable, and know-alls). The article concludes with the construction of a new knowledge management solution called multidimensional rank thesaurus.

Date

13. 7.2011 14:47:22

0.046204112 = product of:
  0.092408225 = sum of:
    0.092408225 = sum of:
      0.055969246 = weight(_text_:2003 in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055969246 = score(doc=1443,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044824958 = queryNorm
          0.28770202 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
      0.03643898 = weight(_text_:22 in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03643898 = score(doc=1443,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044824958 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Terms chosen to represent document subjects, the classification notations assigned to them, the abstracts and indices contain biases in two contexts. In a negative context, document surrogates are constructed with bias when they leave out diverse features, disenfranchise groups and topics outside an accepted norm (Olson, 2002). In this way, these document surrogates would convey inclinations, or prejudices. In a positive context, slanting or tendency (Hjørland, 2008a, McIlwaine, 2003) conveyed by the document surrogates to ensure specificity to particular discursive communities or knowledge domains can be observed. Considering that topics related to biases are scarce in the Information Organization literature, this paper proposes a discussion on the characteristics and occurrences of bias in subject representation. This study is exploratory and bibliographic, and adopts an inductive method.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.046204112 = product of:
  0.092408225 = sum of:
    0.092408225 = sum of:
      0.055969246 = weight(_text_:2003 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055969246 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044824958 = queryNorm
          0.28770202 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
      0.03643898 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03643898 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044824958 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

A recent publication in Nature reports that public R&D funding is only weakly correlated with the citation impact of a nation's articles as measured by the field-weighted citation index (FWCI; defined by Scopus). On the basis of the supplementary data, we up-scaled the design using Web of Science data for the decade 2003-2013 and OECD funding data for the corresponding decade assuming a 2-year delay (2001-2011). Using negative binomial regression analysis, we found very small coefficients, but the effects of international collaboration are positive and statistically significant, whereas the effects of government funding are negative, an order of magnitude smaller, and statistically nonsignificant (in two of three analyses). In other words, international collaboration improves the impact of research articles, whereas more government funding tends to have a small adverse effect when comparing OECD countries.

Date

8. 1.2019 18:22:45

0.044496197 = product of:
  0.088992395 = sum of:
    0.088992395 = product of:
      0.35596958 = sum of:
        0.35596958 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35596958 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3800265 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.032648727 = product of:
  0.065297455 = sum of:
    0.065297455 = product of:
      0.13059491 = sum of:
        0.13059491 = weight(_text_:2003 in 3725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13059491 = score(doc=3725,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.67130476 = fieldWeight in 3725, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3725)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

RSWK

Deutsches Bibliotheksinstitut / Geschichte 1978-2003
Deutschland / Deutsches Bibliotheksinstitut / Bibliothek / Geschichte 1978-2003

Subject

Deutsches Bibliotheksinstitut / Geschichte 1978-2003
Deutschland / Deutsches Bibliotheksinstitut / Bibliothek / Geschichte 1978-2003

0.031147338 = product of:
  0.062294677 = sum of:
    0.062294677 = product of:
      0.24917871 = sum of:
        0.24917871 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24917871 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3800265 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].

0.030802742 = product of:
  0.061605483 = sum of:
    0.061605483 = sum of:
      0.03731283 = weight(_text_:2003 in 1450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03731283 = score(doc=1450,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044824958 = queryNorm
          0.19180135 = fieldWeight in 1450, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1450)
      0.024292652 = weight(_text_:22 in 1450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024292652 = score(doc=1450,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044824958 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1450, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1450)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

LIS genre studies have suggested that representing the genre of a resource could provide better knowledge representation, organization and retrieval (e.g., Andersen, 2008; Crowston & Kwasnik, 2003). Beghtol (2001) argues that genre analysis could be a useful tool for creating a "framework of analysis for a domain ... [to] structure and interpret texts, events, ideas, decisions, explanations and every other human activity in that domain" (p. 19). Although some studies of user-generated tagging vocabularies have found a preponderance of content-related tags (e.g., Munk & Mork, 2007), Lamere's (2008) study of the most frequently applied tags at Last.fm found that tags representing musical genres were favored by taggers. Studies of user-generated genre tags suggest that, unlike traditional indexing, which generally assigns a single genre, users' assignments of genre-related tags provide better representation of the fuzziness at the boundaries of genre categories (Inskip, 2009). In this way, user-generated genre tags are more in line with Bakhtin's (Bakhtin & Medvedev, 1928/1985) conceptualization of genre as an "aggregate of the means for seeing and conceptualizin reality" (p. 137). For Bakhtin (1986), genres are kinds of practice characterized by their "addressivity" (p. 95): Different genres correspond to different "conceptions of the addressee" and are "determined by that area of human activity and everyday life to which the given utterance is related" (p.95). Miller (1984) argues that genre refers to a "conventional category of discourse based in large-scale typification of rhetorical action; as action, it acquires meaning from situation and from the social context in which that situation arose" (p. 163). Genre is part of a social context that produces, reproduces, modifies and ultimately represents a particular text, but how to reunite genre and situation (or text and context) in systems of knowledge organization has not been addressed. Based on Devitt's (1993) argument suggesting that "our construction of genre is what helps us to construct a situation" (p. 577), one way to represent genre as "typified rhetorical actions based in recurrent situations" (Miller, 1984, p. 159) would be to employ genre tags generated by a particular group or community of users. This study suggests application of social network analysis to detect communities (Newman, 2006) of genre taggers and argues that communities of genre taggers can better define the nature and constitution of a discourse community while simultaneously shedding light on multifaceted representations of the resource genres.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.026875436 = product of:
  0.053750873 = sum of:
    0.053750873 = sum of:
      0.027984623 = weight(_text_:2003 in 3080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027984623 = score(doc=3080,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044824958 = queryNorm
          0.14385101 = fieldWeight in 3080, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3080)
      0.02576625 = weight(_text_:22 in 3080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02576625 = score(doc=3080,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044824958 = queryNorm
          0.16414827 = fieldWeight in 3080, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3080)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

"Es gibt Daten, Informationen und Fakten. Wenn man mir eine Zahlenreihe vorsetzt, dann handelt es sich um Daten: unterscheidbare Einheiten, im Fachjargon: Items. Wenn man mir sagt, dass diese Items stündliche Temperaturangaben der Aare im Berner Marzilibad bedeuten, dann verfüge ich über Information - über interpretierte Daten. Wenn man mir sagt, dies seien die gemessenen Aaretemperaturen am 22. August 2016 im Marzili, dann ist das ein Faktum: empirisch geprüfte interpretierte Daten. Dieser Dreischritt - Unterscheiden, Interpretieren, Prüfen - bildet quasi das Bindemittel des Faktischen, «the matter of fact». Wir alle führen den Dreischritt ständig aus und gelangen so zu einem relativ verlässlichen Wissen und Urteilsvermögen betreffend die Dinge des Alltags. Aber wie schon die Kurzcharakterisierung durchblicken lässt, bilden Fakten nicht den Felsengrund der Realität. Sie sind kritikanfällig, sowohl von der Interpretation wie auch von der Prüfung her gesehen. Um bei unserem Beispiel zu bleiben: Es kann durchaus sein, dass man uns zwei unterschiedliche «faktische» Temperaturverläufe der Aare am 22. August 2016 vorsetzt.
- Als eine regelrechte Sumpfblüte aus dem Szenario des «Bullshits» präsentiert sich der republikanische Präsidentschaftskandidat Donald Trump. Aber Künstlichkeit des Faktischen bedeutet nun gerade nicht Unverbindlichkeit. Dieser Fehlschluss stellt sich nicht nur für die Erkenntnistheorie als ruinös heraus, sondern vor allem auch für die Demokratie. Zur Erläuterung benütze ich drei politische Szenarien: jenes der Wahrheit, jenes der Macht und jenes des «Bullshits». Im Szenario der Wahrheit überprüfen wir eine Aussage, bis wir den robusten Konsens für einen Entscheid gefunden haben: Die Aussage ist wahr oder falsch, tertium non datur. Lügner werden überführt, wie US-Aussenminister Colin Powell, der 2003 in der Uno die Intervention im Irak mit falschen faktischen Behauptungen begründete. Dieser Makel haftet ihm bis heute an. Dies gerade auch - und das muss man ihm zugutehalten -, weil Powell das Szenario der Wahrheit anerkennt. George W. Bush und seine Kamarilla im Irakkrieg etablierten dagegen das Szenario der Macht.

0.026697718 = product of:
  0.053395435 = sum of:
    0.053395435 = product of:
      0.21358174 = sum of:
        0.21358174 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21358174 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3800265 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

0.026697718 = product of:
  0.053395435 = sum of:
    0.053395435 = product of:
      0.21358174 = sum of:
        0.21358174 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21358174 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3800265 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.

0.024292652 = product of:
  0.048585303 = sum of:
    0.048585303 = product of:
      0.097170606 = sum of:
        0.097170606 = weight(_text_:22 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.097170606 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.022248099 = product of:
  0.044496197 = sum of:
    0.044496197 = product of:
      0.17798479 = sum of:
        0.17798479 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17798479 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3800265 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.

0.022248099 = product of:
  0.044496197 = sum of:
    0.044496197 = product of:
      0.17798479 = sum of:
        0.17798479 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17798479 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3800265 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.

0.022248099 = product of:
  0.044496197 = sum of:
    0.044496197 = product of:
      0.17798479 = sum of:
        0.17798479 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17798479 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3800265 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>

0.021471873 = product of:
  0.042943746 = sum of:
    0.042943746 = product of:
      0.08588749 = sum of:
        0.08588749 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08588749 = score(doc=2810,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 7.2004 9:42:33
22. 4.2017 11:58:05

0.021471873 = product of:
  0.042943746 = sum of:
    0.042943746 = product of:
      0.08588749 = sum of:
        0.08588749 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08588749 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 4.2017 10:42:05
22. 4.2017 10:48:38

0.021471873 = product of:
  0.042943746 = sum of:
    0.042943746 = product of:
      0.08588749 = sum of:
        0.08588749 = weight(_text_:22 in 3975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08588749 = score(doc=3975,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3975, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3975)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 2.2018 12:06:44
22. 2.2018 12:13:53

0.02125607 = product of:
  0.04251214 = sum of:
    0.04251214 = product of:
      0.08502428 = sum of:
        0.08502428 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08502428 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044824958 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 6.2015 16:08:38