-
Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.: Sentiment in Twitter events (2011)
0.05
0.04568663 = product of:
0.13705988 = sum of:
0.13705988 = sum of:
0.104303196 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.104303196 = score(doc=4345,freq=5.0), product of:
0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.5208769 = fieldWeight in 4345, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4345)
0.03275669 = weight(_text_:22 in 4345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03275669 = score(doc=4345,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4345, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4345)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:27:06
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.406-418
- Year
- 2011
-
Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.; Cai, D.; Kappas, A.: Sentiment strength detection in short informal text (2010)
0.03
0.027423285 = product of:
0.082269855 = sum of:
0.082269855 = sum of:
0.054972615 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054972615 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.27452624 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
0.027297242 = weight(_text_:22 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027297242 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:29:23
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch das Erratum in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.419
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.; Wilkinson, D.: Link and co-inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions (2012)
0.03
0.027423285 = product of:
0.082269855 = sum of:
0.082269855 = sum of:
0.054972615 = weight(_text_:2011 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054972615 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.27452624 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.027297242 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027297242 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Webometric network analyses have been used to map the connectivity of groups of websites to identify clusters, important sites or overall structure. Such analyses have mainly been based upon hyperlink counts, the number of hyperlinks between a pair of websites, although some have used title mentions or URL citations instead. The ability to automatically gather hyperlink counts from Yahoo! ceased in April 2011 and the ability to manually gather such counts was due to cease by early 2012, creating a need for alternatives. This article assesses URL citations and title mentions as possible replacements for hyperlinks in both binary and weighted direct link and co-inlink network diagrams. It also assesses three different types of data for the network connections: hit count estimates, counts of matching URLs, and filtered counts of matching URLs. Results from analyses of U.S. library and information science departments and U.K. universities give evidence that metrics based upon URLs or titles can be appropriate replacements for metrics based upon hyperlinks for both binary and weighted networks, although filtered counts of matching URLs are necessary to give the best results for co-title mention and co-URL citation network diagrams.
- Date
- 6. 4.2012 18:16:22
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.; Oppenheim, C.: Variations between subjects in the extent to which the social sciences have become more interdisciplinary (2011)
0.01
0.014486557 = product of:
0.04345967 = sum of:
0.04345967 = product of:
0.08691934 = sum of:
0.08691934 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08691934 = score(doc=4465,freq=5.0), product of:
0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.4340641 = fieldWeight in 4465, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4465)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.6, S.1118-1129
- Year
- 2011
-
Thelwall, M.: ¬A comparison of link and URL citation counting (2011)
0.01
0.014486557 = product of:
0.04345967 = sum of:
0.04345967 = product of:
0.08691934 = sum of:
0.08691934 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08691934 = score(doc=4533,freq=5.0), product of:
0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.4340641 = fieldWeight in 4533, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4533)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Aslib proceedings. 63(2011) no.4, S.419-425
- Year
- 2011
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: ¬A comparison of methods for collecting web citation data for academic organizations (2011)
0.01
0.014486557 = product of:
0.04345967 = sum of:
0.04345967 = product of:
0.08691934 = sum of:
0.08691934 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08691934 = score(doc=4626,freq=5.0), product of:
0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.4340641 = fieldWeight in 4626, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4626)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1488-1497
- Year
- 2011
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Rezaie, S.: Assessing the citation impact of books : the role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus (2011)
0.01
0.014486557 = product of:
0.04345967 = sum of:
0.04345967 = product of:
0.08691934 = sum of:
0.08691934 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08691934 = score(doc=4920,freq=5.0), product of:
0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.4340641 = fieldWeight in 4920, product of:
2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
5.0 = termFreq=5.0
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.11, S.2147-2164
- Year
- 2011
-
Thelwall, M.: Assessing web search engines : a webometric approach (2011)
0.01
0.013465486 = product of:
0.040396456 = sum of:
0.040396456 = product of:
0.08079291 = sum of:
0.08079291 = weight(_text_:2011 in 10) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08079291 = score(doc=10,freq=3.0), product of:
0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.4034695 = fieldWeight in 10, product of:
1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
3.0 = termFreq=3.0
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=10)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Year
- 2011
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Abdoli, M.: ¬The role of online videos in research communication : a content analysis of YouTube videos cited in academic publications (2012)
0.01
0.009162103 = product of:
0.027486308 = sum of:
0.027486308 = product of:
0.054972615 = sum of:
0.054972615 = weight(_text_:2011 in 382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054972615 = score(doc=382,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.27452624 = fieldWeight in 382, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=382)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Although there is some evidence that online videos are increasingly used by academics for informal scholarly communication and teaching, the extent to which they are used in published academic research is unknown. This article explores the extent to which YouTube videos are cited in academic publications and whether there are significant broad disciplinary differences in this practice. To investigate, we extracted the URL citations to YouTube videos from academic publications indexed by Scopus. A total of 1,808 Scopus publications cited at least one YouTube video, and there was a steady upward growth in citing online videos within scholarly publications from 2006 to 2011, with YouTube citations being most common within arts and humanities (0.3%) and the social sciences (0.2%). A content analysis of 551 YouTube videos cited by research articles indicated that in science (78%) and in medicine and health sciences (77%), over three fourths of the cited videos had either direct scientific (e.g., laboratory experiments) or scientific-related contents (e.g., academic lectures or education) whereas in the arts and humanities, about 80% of the YouTube videos had art, culture, or history themes, and in the social sciences, about 63% of the videos were related to news, politics, advertisements, and documentaries. This shows both the disciplinary differences and the wide variety of innovative research communication uses found for videos within the different subject areas.
-
Sud, P.; Thelwall, M.: Not all international collaboration is beneficial : the Mendeley readership and citation impact of biochemical research collaboration (2016)
0.01
0.007329682 = product of:
0.021989046 = sum of:
0.021989046 = product of:
0.04397809 = sum of:
0.04397809 = weight(_text_:2011 in 3048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04397809 = score(doc=3048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.21962099 = fieldWeight in 3048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This study aims to identify the way researchers collaborate with other researchers in the course of the scientific research life cycle and provide information to the designers of e-Science and e-Research implementations. On the basis of in-depth interviews with and on-site observations of 24 scientists and a follow-up focus group interview in the field of bioscience/nanoscience and technology in Korea, we examined scientific collaboration using the framework of the scientific research life cycle. We attempt to explain the major motiBiochemistry is a highly funded research area that is typified by large research teams and is important for many areas of the life sciences. This article investigates the citation impact and Mendeley readership impact of biochemistry research from 2011 in the Web of Science according to the type of collaboration involved. Negative binomial regression models are used that incorporate, for the first time, the inclusion of specific countries within a team. The results show that, holding other factors constant, larger teams robustly associate with higher impact research, but including additional departments has no effect and adding extra institutions tends to reduce the impact of research. Although international collaboration is apparently not advantageous in general, collaboration with the United States, and perhaps also with some other countries, seems to increase impact. In contrast, collaborations with some other nations seems to decrease impact, although both findings could be due to factors such as differing national proportions of excellent researchers. As a methodological implication, simpler statistical models would find international collaboration to be generally beneficial and so it is important to take into account specific countries when examining collaboration.t only in the beginning phase of the cycle. For communication and information-sharing practices, scientists continue to favor traditional means of communication for security reasons. Barriers to collaboration throughout the phases included different priorities, competitive tensions, and a hierarchical culture among collaborators, whereas credit sharing was a barrier in the research product phase.
-
Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006)
0.01
0.0072792647 = product of:
0.021837793 = sum of:
0.021837793 = product of:
0.043675587 = sum of:
0.043675587 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043675587 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 4.12.2006 12:12:22
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009)
0.01
0.0064340215 = product of:
0.019302065 = sum of:
0.019302065 = product of:
0.03860413 = sum of:
0.03860413 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03860413 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 12:43:51
-
Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research (2016)
0.01
0.0054594483 = product of:
0.016378345 = sum of:
0.016378345 = product of:
0.03275669 = sum of:
0.03275669 = weight(_text_:22 in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03275669 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 19. 3.2016 12:22:00
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Mendeley readership counts : an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2016)
0.01
0.0054594483 = product of:
0.016378345 = sum of:
0.016378345 = product of:
0.03275669 = sum of:
0.03275669 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03275669 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 16.11.2016 11:07:22
-
Didegah, F.; Thelwall, M.: Co-saved, co-tweeted, and co-cited networks (2018)
0.01
0.0054594483 = product of:
0.016378345 = sum of:
0.016378345 = product of:
0.03275669 = sum of:
0.03275669 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03275669 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 28. 7.2018 10:00:22
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: How is science cited on the Web? : a classification of google unique Web citations (2007)
0.00
0.0045495406 = product of:
0.013648621 = sum of:
0.013648621 = product of:
0.027297242 = sum of:
0.027297242 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027297242 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.
-
Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015)
0.00
0.0045495406 = product of:
0.013648621 = sum of:
0.013648621 = product of:
0.027297242 = sum of:
0.027297242 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027297242 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Thelwall, M.: Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published? (2017)
0.00
0.0045495406 = product of:
0.013648621 = sum of:
0.013648621 = product of:
0.027297242 = sum of:
0.027297242 = weight(_text_:22 in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027297242 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020)
0.00
0.0045495406 = product of:
0.013648621 = sum of:
0.013648621 = product of:
0.027297242 = sum of:
0.027297242 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027297242 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023)
0.00
0.0045495406 = product of:
0.013648621 = sum of:
0.013648621 = product of:
0.027297242 = sum of:
0.027297242 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027297242 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040295236 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:11:50
