Search (210 results, page 1 of 11)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Sojka, P.; Liska, M.: ¬The art of mathematics retrieval (2011) 0.07
    0.06600929 = product of:
      0.19802786 = sum of:
        0.19802786 = sum of:
          0.14398208 = weight(_text_:2011 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14398208 = score(doc=3450,freq=7.0), product of:
              0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040295236 = queryNorm
              0.7190282 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
                2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
                  7.0 = termFreq=7.0
                4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
          0.05404578 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05404578 = score(doc=3450,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040295236 = queryNorm
              0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: DocEng2011, September 19-22, 2011, Mountain View, California, USA Copyright 2011 ACM 978-1-4503-0863-2/11/09
    Date
    22. 2.2017 13:00:42
    Year
    2011
  2. Eckert, K.: SKOS: eine Sprache für die Übertragung von Thesauri ins Semantic Web (2011) 0.06
    0.060915507 = product of:
      0.18274651 = sum of:
        0.18274651 = sum of:
          0.13907093 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13907093 = score(doc=4331,freq=5.0), product of:
              0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040295236 = queryNorm
              0.69450253 = fieldWeight in 4331, product of:
                2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                  5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4331)
          0.043675587 = weight(_text_:22 in 4331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043675587 = score(doc=4331,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040295236 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4331, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4331)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    15. 3.2011 19:21:22
    Source
    http://metadaten-twr.org/2011/01/19/skos-simple-knowledge-organisation-system/
    Year
    2011
  3. Zanibbi, R.; Yuan, B.: Keyword and image-based retrieval for mathematical expressions (2011) 0.04
    0.03784987 = product of:
      0.113549605 = sum of:
        0.113549605 = sum of:
          0.08079291 = weight(_text_:2011 in 3449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08079291 = score(doc=3449,freq=3.0), product of:
              0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040295236 = queryNorm
              0.4034695 = fieldWeight in 3449, product of:
                1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                  3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3449)
          0.03275669 = weight(_text_:22 in 3449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03275669 = score(doc=3449,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040295236 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3449, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3449)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2017 12:53:49
    Year
    2011
  4. Open Knowledge Foundation: Prinzipien zu offenen bibliographischen Daten (2011) 0.04
    0.035310518 = product of:
      0.10593155 = sum of:
        0.10593155 = sum of:
          0.067327425 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.067327425 = score(doc=4399,freq=3.0), product of:
              0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040295236 = queryNorm
              0.3362246 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
                1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                  3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
          0.03860413 = weight(_text_:22 in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03860413 = score(doc=4399,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040295236 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2011 18:22:29
    Year
    2011
  5. Treude, L.: ¬Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation : über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung (2013) 0.03
    0.032907944 = product of:
      0.09872383 = sum of:
        0.09872383 = sum of:
          0.065967135 = weight(_text_:2011 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.065967135 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040295236 = queryNorm
              0.32943147 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
          0.03275669 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03275669 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040295236 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Alon Friedman und Richard P. Smiraglia kündigen in ihrem aktuellen Artikel "Nodes and arcs: concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization" an, eine "empirical demonstration of how the domain [of knowledge organisation] itself understands the meaning of a concept" durchzuführen. Die Klärung des Konzeptbegriffs ist ein begrüßenswertes Vorhaben, das die Autoren in einer empirischen Untersuchung von concept maps (also Konzeptdiagrammen) aus dem Bereich der Wissensorganisation nachvollziehen wollen. Beschränkte sich Friedman 2011 in seinem Artikel "Concept theory and semiotics in knowledge organization" [Fn 01] noch ausschließlich auf Sprache als Medium im Zeichenprozess, bezieht er sich nun auf Visualisierungen als Repräsentationsform und scheint somit seinen Ansatz um den Aspekt der Bildlichkeit zu erweitern. Zumindest erwartet man dies nach der Lektüre der Beschreibung des aktuellen Vorhabens von Friedman und Smiraglia, das - wie die Autoren verkünden - auf einer semiotischen Grundlage durchgeführt worden sei.
    Source
    LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx
  6. Strecker, D.: Nutzung der Schattenbibliothek Sci-Hub in Deutschland (2019) 0.03
    0.032907944 = product of:
      0.09872383 = sum of:
        0.09872383 = sum of:
          0.065967135 = weight(_text_:2011 in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.065967135 = score(doc=596,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040295236 = queryNorm
              0.32943147 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
          0.03275669 = weight(_text_:22 in 596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03275669 = score(doc=596,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040295236 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 596, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=596)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Anfang der 2000er Jahre entstanden in Reaktion auf unzureichende Zugangswege zu Fachliteratur und ausgelöst durch steigende Subskriptionsgebühren wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriften erste illegale Dokumentensammlungen, sogenannte Schattenbibliotheken. Schattenbibliotheken sind Internetdienste, die ohne Zustimmung der RechteinhaberInnen Datenbanken mit wissenschaftlichen Volltexten erstellen, betreiben und allen Interessierten dadurch den Zugriff auf wissenschaftliche Literatur ermöglichen. Zu den meistgenutzten Schattenbibliotheken zählt Sci-Hub. Der Dienst wurde 2011 von Alexandra Elbakyan entwickelt und umfasste zum Zeitpunkt der Untersuchung mehr als 74 Millionen Dokumente. Die Akzeptanz dieser Dienste unter Forschenden und anderen Personengruppen, verschwimmende Grenzen in der öffentlichen Wahrnehmung zu Open Access sowie mögliche Konsequenzen für bestehende legale Zugänge zu Fachliteratur beschäftigen nicht nur InformationswissenschaftlerInnen weltweit. In diesem Beitrag wird die Rolle des Phänomens Schattenbibliothek bei der wissenschaftlichen Informationsversorgung in Deutschland untersucht, insbesondere im Hinblick auf regionale Verteilungen von Downloads, Zugriffszeiten, Zusammenhängen zwischen der Größe bestimmter Personengruppen (Bevölkerungszahl, Anzahl wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeitender an Hochschulen) und den Downloadzahlen eines Bundeslands sowie den Eigenschaften der angefragten Dokumente (Themen, Verlage, Publikationsalter beim Zugriff).
    Date
    1. 1.2020 13:22:34
  7. Haenelt, K.: Semantik im Wiki : am Beispiel des MediaWiki und Semantic MediaWiki (2011) 0.03
    0.031419467 = product of:
      0.0942584 = sum of:
        0.0942584 = product of:
          0.1885168 = sum of:
            0.1885168 = weight(_text_:2011 in 3166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1885168 = score(doc=3166,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.94142884 = fieldWeight in 3166, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3166)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Year
    2011
  8. Heller, L.: Sacherschließung von Literatur in und mit der Wikipedia - einfach anfangen? (2011) 0.03
    0.028973114 = product of:
      0.08691934 = sum of:
        0.08691934 = product of:
          0.17383868 = sum of:
            0.17383868 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17383868 = score(doc=4424,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.8681282 = fieldWeight in 4424, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4424)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    http://biblionik.de/2011/04/06/anfangen/
    Year
    2011
  9. Heller, L.: Ergebnisse der Benutzerumfrage "Literaturverwaltung - Was ich benutze und was ich brauche", TIB/UB Hannover 2011 (2011) 0.03
    0.027425159 = product of:
      0.08227547 = sum of:
        0.08227547 = product of:
          0.16455095 = sum of:
            0.16455095 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16455095 = score(doc=4884,freq=7.0), product of:
                0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.82174647 = fieldWeight in 4884, product of:
                  2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
                    7.0 = termFreq=7.0
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4884)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Raw data set (in CSV format) of a user survey about usage and needs regarding reference management software (like Endnote, Zotero, Citavi) in germany 2011. Participants were mainly college students, librarians, and other users of reference management software.
    Year
    2011
  10. Heller, L.: Ordnung des Thesaurus, Anarchie des Taggens : im Bibliothekskatalog glücklich vereint? (2011) 0.03
    0.026930971 = product of:
      0.08079291 = sum of:
        0.08079291 = product of:
          0.16158582 = sum of:
            0.16158582 = weight(_text_:2011 in 2957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16158582 = score(doc=2957,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.806939 = fieldWeight in 2957, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2957)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Year
    2011
  11. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.03
    0.026666466 = product of:
      0.079999395 = sum of:
        0.079999395 = product of:
          0.31999758 = sum of:
            0.31999758 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.31999758 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34162346 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  12. Xiaoyue M.; Cahier, J.-P.: Iconic categorization with knowledge-based "icon systems" can improve collaborative KM (2011) 0.02
    0.02335887 = product of:
      0.07007661 = sum of:
        0.07007661 = product of:
          0.14015321 = sum of:
            0.14015321 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14015321 = score(doc=4837,freq=13.0), product of:
                0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.6999073 = fieldWeight in 4837, product of:
                  3.6055512 = tf(freq=13.0), with freq of:
                    13.0 = termFreq=13.0
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4837)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Icon system could represent an efficient solution for collective iconic categorization of knowledge by providing graphical interpretation. Their pictorial characters assist visualizing the structure of text to become more understandable beyond vocabulary obstacle. In this paper we are proposing a Knowledge Engineering (KM) based iconic representation approach. We assume that these systematic icons improve collective knowledge management. Meanwhile, text (constructed under our knowledge management model - Hypertopic) helps to reduce the diversity of graphical understanding belonging to different users. This "position paper" also prepares to demonstrate our hypothesis by an "iconic social tagging" experiment which is to be accomplished in 2011 with UTT students. We describe the "socio semantic web" information portal involved in this project, and a part of the icons already designed for this experiment in Sustainability field. We have reviewed existing theoretical works on icons from various origins, which can be used to lay the foundation of robust "icons systems".
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=5928690. Vgl. auch: Special Issue on CTS 2011 at Elsevier's Future Generation Computer Systems Journal - http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505611/description)
    Source
    Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS), 2011 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS 2011), May 23-27, 2011,The Sheraton University City Hotel, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
    Year
    2011
  13. WissKI - SPARQL endpoints for authority files : an experimental service provided by the WissKI project (2011) 0.02
    0.023178488 = product of:
      0.069535464 = sum of:
        0.069535464 = product of:
          0.13907093 = sum of:
            0.13907093 = weight(_text_:2011 in 4433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13907093 = score(doc=4433,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.69450253 = fieldWeight in 4433, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4433)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This service is a spin-off of WissKI, a project funded by the German Research Foundation 2009-2011. It is an experimental service only. It might be inaccessible, broken or flawed without any notice. We take no responsibility for the reliability of the service or the data. Do not use in production environments!
    Year
    2011
  14. Celik, I.; Abel, F.; Siehndel, P.: Adaptive faceted search on Twitter (2011) 0.02
    0.023178488 = product of:
      0.069535464 = sum of:
        0.069535464 = product of:
          0.13907093 = sum of:
            0.13907093 = weight(_text_:2011 in 2221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13907093 = score(doc=2221,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.69450253 = fieldWeight in 2221, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2221)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    http://fabianabel.de/papers/2011-wis-twitter-faceted-search-sasweb.pdf
    Year
    2011
  15. Plochberger, F.: Neues Paradigma in der Informationswissenschaft : wissenschaftlicher Ansatz, um die Informationstechnologie für den Menschen erfreulicher zu gestalten (2011) 0.02
    0.022442475 = product of:
      0.067327425 = sum of:
        0.067327425 = product of:
          0.13465485 = sum of:
            0.13465485 = weight(_text_:2011 in 7265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13465485 = score(doc=7265,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.6724492 = fieldWeight in 7265, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7265)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Year
    2011
  16. Calculating the h-index : Web of Science, Scopus or Google Scholar? (2011) 0.02
    0.022442475 = product of:
      0.067327425 = sum of:
        0.067327425 = product of:
          0.13465485 = sum of:
            0.13465485 = weight(_text_:2011 in 854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13465485 = score(doc=854,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.6724492 = fieldWeight in 854, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=854)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Year
    2011
  17. Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017) 0.02
    0.021938628 = product of:
      0.06581588 = sum of:
        0.06581588 = sum of:
          0.04397809 = weight(_text_:2011 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04397809 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040295236 = queryNorm
              0.21962099 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
          0.021837793 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021837793 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14110705 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040295236 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
  18. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.02
    0.021333173 = product of:
      0.06399952 = sum of:
        0.06399952 = product of:
          0.25599808 = sum of:
            0.25599808 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.25599808 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34162346 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  19. Umstätter, W.: Wissen als geistiges Eigentum (2011) 0.02
    0.020281179 = product of:
      0.060843535 = sum of:
        0.060843535 = product of:
          0.12168707 = sum of:
            0.12168707 = weight(_text_:2011 in 768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12168707 = score(doc=768,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.60768974 = fieldWeight in 768, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=768)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.18, 2011, S.3-11
    Year
    2011
  20. Líska, M.; Sojka, P.: MIaS 1.5 (2014) 0.02
    0.019043073 = product of:
      0.05712922 = sum of:
        0.05712922 = product of:
          0.11425844 = sum of:
            0.11425844 = weight(_text_:2011 in 1652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11425844 = score(doc=1652,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.2002454 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040295236 = queryNorm
                0.5705921 = fieldWeight in 1652, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.9694557 = idf(docFreq=834, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A math-aware, full-text indexing based search engine that enables users to search for mathematical formulae inside documents. Search engine is unique because it is able to index and search structural information like representation of mathematical formulae. There is no other software or IR system that is able to store three billions of formulae in its index and search it with response time below a second. MIaS processes documents containing mathematical notation in MathML format. The system is built as an extension to any full-text indexing engine and has been verifiend on state-of-the-art Lucene core. It is scalable - it was verified to index almost whole arxiv.org (440,000 papers) having more than 160,000,000 formulae. Software is being used in EuDML (eudml.org) and other digital libraries. For more details see papers in peer reviewed conferences: [1] Sojka, Petr; Líska, Martin. In Matthew R. B. Hardy, Frank Wm. Tompa. Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering. Mountain View, CA, USA : ACM, 2011. pp.57--60. [2] Sojka, Petr; Líska, Martin. In J.H.Davenport, W.M. Farmer, J.Urban, F. Rabe. Intelligent Computer Mathematics LNCS 6824. Springer, 2011, pp.228--243.

Years

Languages

  • d 103
  • e 101
  • el 2
  • a 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 88
  • i 10
  • m 6
  • r 3
  • s 3
  • x 3
  • b 2
  • n 1
  • More… Less…