Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

Abramo, G.; D'Angelo, C.A.; Viel, F.: Assessing the accuracy of the h- and g-indexes for measuring researchers' productivity (2013) 0.03

0.030602714 = product of:
  0.061205428 = sum of:
    0.061205428 = product of:
      0.122410856 = sum of:
        0.122410856 = weight(_text_:2013 in 957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.122410856 = score(doc=957,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.22795638 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.53699243 = fieldWeight in 957, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=957)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.6, S.1224-1234
Year: 2013

Abramo, G.; D'Angelo, C.A.: ¬The VQR, Italy's second national research assessment : methodological failures and ranking distortions (2015) 0.02
```
0.019354858 = product of:
  0.038709715 = sum of:
    0.038709715 = product of:
      0.07741943 = sum of:
        0.07741943 = weight(_text_:2013 in 2256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07741943 = score(doc=2256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22795638 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.33962387 = fieldWeight in 2256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2256)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

The 2004-2010 VQR (Research Quality Evaluation), completed in July 2013, was Italy's second national research assessment exercise. The VQR performance evaluation followed a pattern also seen in other nations, as it was based on a selected subset of products. In this work, we identify the exercise's methodological weaknesses and measure the distortions that result from them in the university performance rankings. First, we create a scenario in which we assume the efficient selection of the products to be submitted by the universities and, from this, simulate a set of rankings applying the precise VQR rating criteria. Next, we compare these "VQR rankings" with those that would derive from the application of more-appropriate bibliometrics. Finally, we extend the comparison to university rankings based on the entire scientific production for the period, as indexed in the Web of Science.

D'Angelo, C.A.; Giuffrida, C.; Abramo, G.: ¬A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (2011) 0.01

0.009042659 = product of:
  0.018085318 = sum of:
    0.018085318 = product of:
      0.036170635 = sum of:
        0.036170635 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036170635 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15581343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 22. 1.2011 13:06:52

Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors