Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0547438 = product of:
  0.1094876 = sum of:
    0.1094876 = product of:
      0.2189752 = sum of:
        0.2189752 = weight(_text_:2013 in 4560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2189752 = score(doc=4560,freq=9.0), product of:
            0.22795638 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.96060133 = fieldWeight in 4560, product of:
              3.0 = tf(freq=9.0), with freq of:
                9.0 = termFreq=9.0
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4560)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Erwiderung auf die Rezension von John Searle zu: Koch, C.: Consciousness: confessions of a romantic reductionist. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press 2012 in:The New York Review of Books, 10.01.2013 [https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2013/03/07/can-photodiode-be-conscious/?pagination=false&printpage=true]

Source

New York Review of Books, [https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2013/01/10/can-information-theory-explain-consciousness/]. 2013

Year

2013

0.015803173 = product of:
  0.031606346 = sum of:
    0.031606346 = product of:
      0.06321269 = sum of:
        0.06321269 = weight(_text_:2013 in 5311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06321269 = score(doc=5311,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.22795638 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.2773017 = fieldWeight in 5311, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5311)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Year

2013

0.0150711 = product of:
  0.0301422 = sum of:
    0.0301422 = product of:
      0.0602844 = sum of:
        0.0602844 = weight(_text_:22 in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0602844 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15581343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

17. 1.2020 22:15:11

0.009123967 = product of:
  0.018247934 = sum of:
    0.018247934 = product of:
      0.036495868 = sum of:
        0.036495868 = weight(_text_:2013 in 4561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036495868 = score(doc=4561,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22795638 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.16010022 = fieldWeight in 4561, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4561)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Now it might seem that is a fairly well-defined scientific task: just figure out how the brain does it. In the end I think that is the right attitude to have. But our peculiar history makes it difficult to have exactly that attitude-to take consciousness as a biological phenomenon like digestion or photosynthesis, and figure out how exactly it works as a biological phenomenon. Two philosophical obstacles cast a shadow over the whole subject. The first is the tradition of God, the soul, and immortality. Consciousness is not a part of the ordinary biological world of digestion and photosynthesis: it is part of a spiritual world. It is sometimes thought to be a property of the soul and the soul is definitely not a part of the physical world. The other tradition, almost as misleading, is a certain conception of Science with a capital "S." Science is said to be "reductionist" and "materialist," and so construed there is no room for consciousness in Science. If it really exists, consciousness must really be something else. It must be reducible to something else, such as neuron firings, computer programs running in the brain, or dispositions to behavior. There are also a number of purely technical difficulties to neurobiological research. The brain is an extremely complicated mechanism with about a hundred billion neurons in ... (Rest nicht frei). " [https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2013/01/10/can-information-theory-explain-consciousness/].
Erwiderung von C. Koch u. G. Tononi in: The New York Review of Books, 07.03.2013 [https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2013/03/07/can-photodiode-be-conscious/?pagination=false&printpage=true] mit einer weiteren Erwiderung von J. Searle.