Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × classification_ss:"08.32 (Erkenntnistheorie)"
  1. Dupré, J.: ¬The disorder of things : metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science (1993) 0.01
    0.012903238 = product of:
      0.025806475 = sum of:
        0.025806475 = product of:
          0.05161295 = sum of:
            0.05161295 = weight(_text_:2013 in 783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05161295 = score(doc=783,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22795638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04449486 = queryNorm
                0.2264159 = fieldWeight in 783, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=783)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 40(2013) no.2, S-149-151 (Elizabeth Milonas); vgl. http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_40_2013_2_g.pdf.
  2. Koch, C.: Consciousness : confessions of a romantic reductionist (2012) 0.01
    0.009123967 = product of:
      0.018247934 = sum of:
        0.018247934 = product of:
          0.036495868 = sum of:
            0.036495868 = weight(_text_:2013 in 4561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036495868 = score(doc=4561,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22795638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04449486 = queryNorm
                0.16010022 = fieldWeight in 4561, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4561)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Now it might seem that is a fairly well-defined scientific task: just figure out how the brain does it. In the end I think that is the right attitude to have. But our peculiar history makes it difficult to have exactly that attitude-to take consciousness as a biological phenomenon like digestion or photosynthesis, and figure out how exactly it works as a biological phenomenon. Two philosophical obstacles cast a shadow over the whole subject. The first is the tradition of God, the soul, and immortality. Consciousness is not a part of the ordinary biological world of digestion and photosynthesis: it is part of a spiritual world. It is sometimes thought to be a property of the soul and the soul is definitely not a part of the physical world. The other tradition, almost as misleading, is a certain conception of Science with a capital "S." Science is said to be "reductionist" and "materialist," and so construed there is no room for consciousness in Science. If it really exists, consciousness must really be something else. It must be reducible to something else, such as neuron firings, computer programs running in the brain, or dispositions to behavior. There are also a number of purely technical difficulties to neurobiological research. The brain is an extremely complicated mechanism with about a hundred billion neurons in ... (Rest nicht frei). " [https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2013/01/10/can-information-theory-explain-consciousness/].
    Erwiderung von C. Koch u. G. Tononi in: The New York Review of Books, 07.03.2013 [https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2013/03/07/can-photodiode-be-conscious/?pagination=false&printpage=true] mit einer weiteren Erwiderung von J. Searle.