Search (90 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  1. Vogt, T.; Botz, G.W.: Open Access - schöne neue Welt? : Ein Interview mit Georg W. Botz, Koordinator der Open Access Poliy der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (2013) 0.06 
    0.061205428 = product of:
  0.122410856 = sum of:
    0.122410856 = product of:
      0.24482171 = sum of:
        0.24482171 = weight(_text_:2013 in 794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24482171 = score(doc=794,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.22795638 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            1.0739849 = fieldWeight in 794, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=794)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2013, H.2, S.98-101
    Year
    2013
  2. Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015) 0.05 
    0.047329195 = product of:
  0.09465839 = sum of:
    0.09465839 = sum of:
      0.06451619 = weight(_text_:2013 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06451619 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22795638 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04449486 = queryNorm
          0.28301987 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
      0.0301422 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0301422 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15581343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04449486 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose The four major Subject Repositories (SRs), arXiv, Research Papers in Economics (RePEc), Social Science Research Network (SSRN) and PubMed Central (PMC), are all important within their disciplines but no previous study has systematically compared how often they are cited in academic publications. In response, the purpose of this paper is to report an analysis of citations to SRs from Scopus publications, 2000-2013. Design/methodology/approach Scopus searches were used to count the number of documents citing the four SRs in each year. A random sample of 384 documents citing the four SRs was then visited to investigate the nature of the citations. Findings Each SR was most cited within its own subject area but attracted substantial citations from other subject areas, suggesting that they are open to interdisciplinary uses. The proportion of documents citing each SR is continuing to increase rapidly, and the SRs all seem to attract substantial numbers of citations from more than one discipline. Research limitations/implications Scopus does not cover all publications, and most citations to documents found in the four SRs presumably cite the published version, when one exists, rather than the repository version. Practical implications SRs are continuing to grow and do not seem to be threatened by institutional repositories and so research managers should encourage their continued use within their core disciplines, including for research that aims at an audience in other disciplines. Originality/value This is the first simultaneous analysis of Scopus citations to the four most popular SRs.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  3. Loos, A.: Ein Jahr Elsevier-Boykott (2013) 0.04 
    0.04080362 = product of:
  0.08160724 = sum of:
    0.08160724 = product of:
      0.16321447 = sum of:
        0.16321447 = weight(_text_:2013 in 945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16321447 = score(doc=945,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.22795638 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.71598995 = fieldWeight in 945, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=945)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 2013, H.2, S.90-97
    Year
    2013
  4. Kaden, B.: Elektronisches Publizieren (2013) 0.04 
    0.039507933 = product of:
  0.079015866 = sum of:
    0.079015866 = product of:
      0.15803173 = sum of:
        0.15803173 = weight(_text_:2013 in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15803173 = score(doc=732,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.22795638 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.69325423 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Year
    2013
  5. Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017) 0.04 
    0.037863355 = product of:
  0.07572671 = sum of:
    0.07572671 = sum of:
      0.05161295 = weight(_text_:2013 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05161295 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22795638 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04449486 = queryNorm
          0.2264159 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
      0.024113758 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024113758 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15581343 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04449486 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose The introduction of "altmetrics" as new tools to analyze scientific impact within the reward system of science has challenged the hegemony of citations as the predominant source for measuring scientific impact. Mendeley readership has been identified as one of the most important altmetric sources, with several features that are similar to citations. The purpose of this paper is to perform an in-depth analysis of the differences and similarities between the distributions of Mendeley readership and citations across fields. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyze two issues by using in each case a common analytical framework for both metrics: the shape of the distributions of readership and citations, and the field normalization problem generated by differences in citation and readership practices across fields. In the first issue the authors use the characteristic scores and scales method, and in the second the measurement framework introduced in Crespo et al. (2013). Findings There are three main results. First, the citations and Mendeley readership distributions exhibit a strikingly similar degree of skewness in all fields. Second, the results on "exchange rates (ERs)" for Mendeley readership empirically supports the possibility of comparing readership counts across fields, as well as the field normalization of readership distributions using ERs as normalization factors. Third, field normalization using field mean readerships as normalization factors leads to comparably good results. Originality/value These findings open up challenging new questions, particularly regarding the possibility of obtaining conflicting results from field normalized citation and Mendeley readership indicators; this suggests the need for better determining the role of the two metrics in capturing scientific recognition.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  6. Stäcker, T.: Wie schreibt man Digital Humanities richtig? : Überlegungen zum wissenschaftlichen Publizieren im digitalen Zeitalter (2013) 0.03 
    0.030602714 = product of:
  0.061205428 = sum of:
    0.061205428 = product of:
      0.122410856 = sum of:
        0.122410856 = weight(_text_:2013 in 739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.122410856 = score(doc=739,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.22795638 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.53699243 = fieldWeight in 739, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=739)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 47(2013) H.1, S.24-50
    Year
    2013
  7. Veittes, M.: Electronic Book (1995) 0.03 
    0.0301422 = product of:
  0.0602844 = sum of:
    0.0602844 = product of:
      0.1205688 = sum of:
        0.1205688 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1205688 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15581343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22
  8. Weishaupt, K.: Open-Access-Zeitschriften als Schuttabladeplatz für minderwertige Beiträge? (2013) 0.03 
    0.027655553 = product of:
  0.055311106 = sum of:
    0.055311106 = product of:
      0.11062221 = sum of:
        0.11062221 = weight(_text_:2013 in 792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11062221 = score(doc=792,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.22795638 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.48527798 = fieldWeight in 792, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=792)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Year
    2013
  9. Sommer, D.; Schöning-Walter, C.; Heiligenhaus, K.: URN Granular : persistente Identifizierung und Adressierung von Einzelseiten digitalisierter Drucke (2008) 0.03 
    0.025806475 = product of:
  0.05161295 = sum of:
    0.05161295 = product of:
      0.1032259 = sum of:
        0.1032259 = weight(_text_:2013 in 3929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1032259 = score(doc=3929,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22795638 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.4528318 = fieldWeight in 3929, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3929)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Aufschlussreich kann womöglich auch der Abschlussbericht aus dem IANUS-Projekt bezüglich "Persistent Identifiers" sein. In diesem Bericht wird u.a. auf die Problematik der "Datenansammlung" eingegangen, die entstehen kann bei der Vergabe zuvieler einzelner URNs (siehe S. 10, S. 42 ff.). Martina Trognitz: Abschlussbericht Testbed "Persistent Identifiers". [Version 1.0] Hrsg. IANUS. 2013 http://www.ianus-fdz.de/projects/ergebnisse/wiki (direkter Link: http://www.ianus-fdz.de/attachments/download/560/Testbed-Persistent%20Identifiers.pdf)
  10. Zschunke, P.; Svensson, P.: Bücherbrett für alle Fälle : Geräte-Speicher fassen Tausende von Seiten (2000) 0.03 
    0.025576504 = product of:
  0.051153008 = sum of:
    0.051153008 = product of:
      0.102306016 = sum of:
        0.102306016 = weight(_text_:22 in 4823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.102306016 = score(doc=4823,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15581343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4823, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4823)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
    18. 6.2000 9:11:22
  11. D'Ambra, J.; Wilson, C.S.; Akter, S.: Application of the task-technology fit model to structure and evaluate the adoption of E-books by Academics (2013) 0.03 
    0.025502263 = product of:
  0.051004525 = sum of:
    0.051004525 = product of:
      0.10200905 = sum of:
        0.10200905 = weight(_text_:2013 in 529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10200905 = score(doc=529,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.22795638 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.44749373 = fieldWeight in 529, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=529)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.1, S.48-64
    Year
    2013
  12. Martin, K.; Quan-Haase, A.: Are e-books replacing print books? : tradition, serendipity, and opportunity in the adoption and use of e-books for historical research and teaching (2013) 0.03 
    0.025502263 = product of:
  0.051004525 = sum of:
    0.051004525 = product of:
      0.10200905 = sum of:
        0.10200905 = weight(_text_:2013 in 748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10200905 = score(doc=748,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.22795638 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.44749373 = fieldWeight in 748, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=748)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.5, S.1016-1028
    Year
    2013
  13. Laakso, M.; Björk, B.-C.: Delayed open access : an overlooked high-impact category of openly available scientific literature (2013) 0.03 
    0.025502263 = product of:
  0.051004525 = sum of:
    0.051004525 = product of:
      0.10200905 = sum of:
        0.10200905 = weight(_text_:2013 in 944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10200905 = score(doc=944,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.22795638 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.44749373 = fieldWeight in 944, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=944)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.7, S.1323-1329
    Year
    2013
  14. Ferro, N.; Silvello, G.: NESTOR: a formal model for digital archives (2013) 0.03 
    0.025502263 = product of:
  0.051004525 = sum of:
    0.051004525 = product of:
      0.10200905 = sum of:
        0.10200905 = weight(_text_:2013 in 2707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10200905 = score(doc=2707,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.22795638 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.44749373 = fieldWeight in 2707, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2707)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 49(2013) no.6, S.1206-1240
    Year
    2013
  15. Leuser, P.: SGML-Einsatz bei Duden und Brockhaus : ein Verlag auf neuem Weg (1993) 0.02 
    0.024113758 = product of:
  0.048227515 = sum of:
    0.048227515 = product of:
      0.09645503 = sum of:
        0.09645503 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09645503 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15581343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22
  16. Polatscheck, K.: Elektronische Versuchung : Test des Sony Data Discman: eine digitale Konkurrenz für Taschenbücher? (1992) 0.02 
    0.024113758 = product of:
  0.048227515 = sum of:
    0.048227515 = product of:
      0.09645503 = sum of:
        0.09645503 = weight(_text_:22 in 6381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09645503 = score(doc=6381,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15581343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6381, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6381)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Zeit. Nr.xx vom ???, S.22
  17. Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998) 0.02 
    0.024113758 = product of:
  0.048227515 = sum of:
    0.048227515 = product of:
      0.09645503 = sum of:
        0.09645503 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09645503 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15581343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
  18. Zahedi, Z.; Costas, R.; Wouters, P.: Mendeley readership as a filtering tool to identify highly cited publications (2017) 0.02 
    0.022809917 = product of:
  0.045619834 = sum of:
    0.045619834 = product of:
      0.09123967 = sum of:
        0.09123967 = weight(_text_:2013 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09123967 = score(doc=3837,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22795638 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.40025055 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.123207 = idf(docFreq=715, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This study presents a large-scale analysis of the distribution and presence of Mendeley readership scores over time and across disciplines. We study whether Mendeley readership scores (RS) can identify highly cited publications more effectively than journal citation scores (JCS). Web of Science (WoS) publications with digital object identifiers (DOIs) published during the period 2004-2013 and across five major scientific fields were analyzed. The main result of this study shows that RS are more effective (in terms of precision/recall values) than JCS to identify highly cited publications across all fields of science and publication years. The findings also show that 86.5% of all the publications are covered by Mendeley and have at least one reader. Also, the share of publications with Mendeley RS is increasing from 84% in 2004 to 89% in 2009, and decreasing from 88% in 2010 to 82% in 2013. However, it is noted that publications from 2010 onwards exhibit on average a higher density of readership versus citation scores. This indicates that compared to citation scores, RS are more prevalent for recent publications and hence they could work as an early indicator of research impact. These findings highlight the potential and value of Mendeley as a tool for scientometric purposes and particularly as a relevant tool to identify highly cited publications.
  19. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.02 
    0.021313753 = product of:
  0.042627506 = sum of:
    0.042627506 = product of:
      0.08525501 = sum of:
        0.08525501 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08525501 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15581343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  20. Dechsling, R.: Softwaretypen : Datenbank, Hypertext oder linearer Text? (1994) 0.02 
    0.021099538 = product of:
  0.042199075 = sum of:
    0.042199075 = product of:
      0.08439815 = sum of:
        0.08439815 = weight(_text_:22 in 8074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08439815 = score(doc=8074,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15581343 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04449486 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8074, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8074)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Börsenblatt. Nr.50 vom 24.6.1994, S.19-22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 52
  • e 37

Types

  • a 83
  • el 6
  • m 4
  • s 3
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications