-
Cronin, B.: Vernacular and vehicular language (2009)
0.02
0.02125807 = product of:
0.04251614 = sum of:
0.04251614 = product of:
0.08503228 = sum of:
0.08503228 = weight(_text_:22 in 7192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08503228 = score(doc=7192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15698412 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04482917 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7192)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 11:44:11
-
Cronin, B.: Thinking about data (2013)
0.02
0.02125807 = product of:
0.04251614 = sum of:
0.04251614 = product of:
0.08503228 = sum of:
0.08503228 = weight(_text_:22 in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08503228 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15698412 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04482917 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 16:18:36
-
Cronin, B.; Meho, L.I.: Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists (2006)
0.02
0.018565506 = product of:
0.03713101 = sum of:
0.03713101 = product of:
0.07426202 = sum of:
0.07426202 = weight(_text_:2005 in 196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07426202 = score(doc=196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1940735 = queryWeight, product of:
4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
0.04482917 = queryNorm
0.38264894 = fieldWeight in 196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The authors apply a new bibliometric measure, the h-index (Hirsch, 2005), to the literature of information science. Faculty rankings based on raw citation counts are compared with those based on h-counts. There is a strong positive correlation between the two sets of rankings. It is shown how the h-index can be used to express the broad impact of a scholar's research output over time in more nuanced fashion than straight citation counts.
-
Cronin, B.: ¬The writing on the wall (2015)
0.02
0.018221201 = product of:
0.036442403 = sum of:
0.036442403 = product of:
0.072884806 = sum of:
0.072884806 = weight(_text_:22 in 7297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072884806 = score(doc=7297,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15698412 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04482917 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7297, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7297)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26. 4.2015 19:27:22
-
Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000)
0.02
0.015184335 = product of:
0.03036867 = sum of:
0.03036867 = product of:
0.06073734 = sum of:
0.06073734 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06073734 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15698412 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04482917 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2001 20:22:57