Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Dunsire, G."
  1. Dunsire, G.; Nicholson, D.: Signposting the crossroads : terminology Web services and classification-based interoperability (2010) 0.04
    0.036434602 = product of:
      0.1093038 = sum of:
        0.1093038 = sum of:
          0.08163128 = weight(_text_:2010 in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08163128 = score(doc=4066,freq=5.0), product of:
              0.19538787 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040849205 = queryNorm
              0.41779095 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
                2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                  5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
          0.027672518 = weight(_text_:22 in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027672518 = score(doc=4066,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040849205 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    6. 1.2011 19:22:48
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 37(2010) no.4, S.280-286
    Year
    2010
  2. Dunsire, G.: Interoperability and semantics in RDF representations of FRBR, FRAD and FRSAD (2011) 0.01
    0.014903765 = product of:
      0.044711296 = sum of:
        0.044711296 = product of:
          0.08942259 = sum of:
            0.08942259 = weight(_text_:2010 in 651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08942259 = score(doc=651,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19538787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.45766705 = fieldWeight in 651, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=651)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes recent work on registering Resource Description Framework (RDF) versions of the entities and relationships from the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD) models developed by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). FRBR was developed several years before FRAD, and is under-developed in areas which FRAD was expected to cover; FRAD therefore makes significance reference to FRBR. Similarly, FRAD leaves a full treatment of subject authority data to the ongoing development of Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) which was finalised during 2010. Although the FRBR Review Group is charged with consolidating all three models in due course, the RDF versions of FRBR, FRAD, and FRSAD are being created in separate namespaces, with a separate Web Ontology Language (OWL) ontology to connect the three models. The paper discusses interoperability issues arising from this work. Such issues include class definitions and sub-classes, reciprocal properties, and disjoint classes and properties. The paper discusses similar work on the International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD), also maintained by IFLA, and related issues arising from the RDF representation of the metadata element set of RDA: resource description and access, which is based on the FRBR and FRAD models. The work is ongoing, and the paper updates the original conference presentation to the end of October 2010.
    Source
    Concepts in context: Proceedings of the Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization July 19th - 20th, 2010. Eds.: F. Boteram, W. Gödert u. J. Hubrich
  3. Dunsire, G.; Willer, M.: Initiatives to make standard library metadata models and structures available to the Semantic Web (2010) 0.01
    0.010884171 = product of:
      0.032652512 = sum of:
        0.032652512 = product of:
          0.065305024 = sum of:
            0.065305024 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065305024 = score(doc=3965,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.19538787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.33423275 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vortrag im Rahmen der Session 93. Cataloguing der WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 76TH IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND ASSEMBLY, 10-15 August 2010, Gothenburg, Sweden - 149. Information Technology, Cataloguing, Classification and Indexing with Knowledge Management
    Year
    2010
  4. Vatant, B.; Dunsire, G.: Use case vocabulary merging (2010) 0.01
    0.008430842 = product of:
      0.025292527 = sum of:
        0.025292527 = product of:
          0.050585054 = sum of:
            0.050585054 = weight(_text_:2010 in 4336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050585054 = score(doc=4336,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.19538787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.25889558 = fieldWeight in 4336, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4336)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Year
    2010
  5. Baker, T.; Bermès, E.; Coyle, K.; Dunsire, G.; Isaac, A.; Murray, P.; Panzer, M.; Schneider, J.; Singer, R.; Summers, E.; Waites, W.; Young, J.; Zeng, M.: Library Linked Data Incubator Group Final Report (2011) 0.01
    0.0068837544 = product of:
      0.020651262 = sum of:
        0.020651262 = product of:
          0.041302525 = sum of:
            0.041302525 = weight(_text_:2010 in 4796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041302525 = score(doc=4796,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19538787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.21138735 = fieldWeight in 4796, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4796)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The mission of the W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group, chartered from May 2010 through August 2011, has been "to help increase global interoperability of library data on the Web, by bringing together people involved in Semantic Web activities - focusing on Linked Data - in the library community and beyond, building on existing initiatives, and identifying collaboration tracks for the future." In Linked Data [LINKEDDATA], data is expressed using standards such as Resource Description Framework (RDF) [RDF], which specifies relationships between things, and Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs, or "Web addresses") [URI]. This final report of the Incubator Group examines how Semantic Web standards and Linked Data principles can be used to make the valuable information assets that library create and curate - resources such as bibliographic data, authorities, and concept schemes - more visible and re-usable outside of their original library context on the wider Web. The Incubator Group began by eliciting reports on relevant activities from parties ranging from small, independent projects to national library initiatives (see the separate report, Library Linked Data Incubator Group: Use Cases) [USECASE]. These use cases provided the starting point for the work summarized in the report: an analysis of the benefits of library Linked Data, a discussion of current issues with regard to traditional library data, existing library Linked Data initiatives, and legal rights over library data; and recommendations for next steps. The report also summarizes the results of a survey of current Linked Data technologies and an inventory of library Linked Data resources available today (see also the more detailed report, Library Linked Data Incubator Group: Datasets, Value Vocabularies, and Metadata Element Sets) [VOCABDATASET].