Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.013605214 = product of:
  0.04081564 = sum of:
    0.04081564 = product of:
      0.08163128 = sum of:
        0.08163128 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08163128 = score(doc=3966,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.19538787 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040849205 = queryNorm
            0.41779095 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.9, S.1734-1744

Year

2010

0.008604692 = product of:
  0.025814077 = sum of:
    0.025814077 = product of:
      0.051628154 = sum of:
        0.051628154 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051628154 = score(doc=3766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19538787 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040849205 = queryNorm
            0.2642342 = fieldWeight in 3766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3766)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

SlideShare is a free social website that aims to help users distribute and find presentations. Owned by LinkedIn since 2012, it targets a professional audience but may give value to scholarship through creating a long-term record of the content of talks. This article tests this hypothesis by analyzing sets of general and scholarly related SlideShare documents using content and citation analysis and popularity statistics reported on the site. The results suggest that academics, students, and teachers are a minority of SlideShare uploaders, especially since 2010, with most documents not being directly related to scholarship or teaching. About two thirds of uploaded SlideShare documents are presentation slides, with the remainder often being files associated with presentations or video recordings of talks. SlideShare is therefore a presentation-centered site with a predominantly professional user base. Although a minority of the uploaded SlideShare documents are cited by, or cite, academic publications, probably too few articles are cited by SlideShare to consider extracting SlideShare citations for research evaluation. Nevertheless, scholars should consider SlideShare to be a potential source of academic and nonacademic information, particularly in library and information science, education, and business.

0.0046120863 = product of:
  0.013836259 = sum of:
    0.013836259 = product of:
      0.027672518 = sum of:
        0.027672518 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027672518 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040849205 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.

0.0046120863 = product of:
  0.013836259 = sum of:
    0.013836259 = product of:
      0.027672518 = sum of:
        0.027672518 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027672518 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040849205 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.0046120863 = product of:
  0.013836259 = sum of:
    0.013836259 = product of:
      0.027672518 = sum of:
        0.027672518 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027672518 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040849205 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 6.2023 18:11:50