Search (27 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. MacRoberts, M.H.; MacRoberts, B.R.: Problems of citation analysis : a study of uncited and seldom-cited influences (2010) 0.02
    0.021768343 = product of:
      0.065305024 = sum of:
        0.065305024 = product of:
          0.13061005 = sum of:
            0.13061005 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13061005 = score(doc=3308,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.19538787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.6684655 = fieldWeight in 3308, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3308)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.1, S.1-12
    Year
    2010
  2. Hellqvist, B.: Referencing in the humanities and its implications for citation analysis (2010) 0.02
    0.0190473 = product of:
      0.057141896 = sum of:
        0.057141896 = product of:
          0.11428379 = sum of:
            0.11428379 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11428379 = score(doc=3329,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.19538787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.5849073 = fieldWeight in 3329, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3329)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.2, S.310-318
    Year
    2010
  3. Leydesdorff, L.; Salah, A.A.A.: Maps on the basis of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index : the journals Leonardo and Art Journal versus "digital humanities" as a topic (2010) 0.02
    0.016326256 = product of:
      0.048978765 = sum of:
        0.048978765 = product of:
          0.09795753 = sum of:
            0.09795753 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09795753 = score(doc=3436,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.19538787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.5013491 = fieldWeight in 3436, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3436)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.4, S.787-801
    Year
    2010
  4. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.01
    0.014758676 = product of:
      0.04427603 = sum of:
        0.04427603 = product of:
          0.08855206 = sum of:
            0.08855206 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08855206 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  5. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.01
    0.014758676 = product of:
      0.04427603 = sum of:
        0.04427603 = product of:
          0.08855206 = sum of:
            0.08855206 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08855206 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  6. Ardanuy, J.: Sixty years of citation analysis studies in the humanities (1951-2010) (2013) 0.01
    0.014602648 = product of:
      0.043807942 = sum of:
        0.043807942 = product of:
          0.087615885 = sum of:
            0.087615885 = weight(_text_:2010 in 1015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.087615885 = score(doc=1015,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19538787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.4484203 = fieldWeight in 1015, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1015)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article provides an overview of studies that have used citation analysis in the field of humanities in the period 1951 to 2010. The work is based on an exhaustive search in databases-particularly those in library and information science-and on citation chaining from papers on citation analysis. The results confirm that use of this technique in the humanities is limited, and although there was some growth in the 1970s and 1980s, it has stagnated in the past 2 decades. Most of the work has been done by research staff, but almost one third involves library staff, and 15% has been done by students. The study also showed that less than one fourth of the works used a citation database such as the Arts & Humanities Citation Index and that 21% of the works were in publications other than library and information science journals. The United States has the greatest output, and English is by far the most frequently used language, and 13.9% of the studies are in other languages.
  7. Leydesdorff, L.; Moya-Anegón, F.de; Guerrero-Bote, V.P.: Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data : a comparison with the Journal Citation Reports of the ISI (2010) 0.01
    0.013605214 = product of:
      0.04081564 = sum of:
        0.04081564 = product of:
          0.08163128 = sum of:
            0.08163128 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08163128 = score(doc=3335,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.19538787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.41779095 = fieldWeight in 3335, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3335)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.2, S.352-369
    Year
    2010
  8. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.; Cardona, M.: Reference standards and reference multipliers for the comparison of the citation impact of papers published in different time periods (2010) 0.01
    0.013605214 = product of:
      0.04081564 = sum of:
        0.04081564 = product of:
          0.08163128 = sum of:
            0.08163128 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08163128 = score(doc=3998,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.19538787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.41779095 = fieldWeight in 3998, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3998)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.10, S.2061-20690
    Year
    2010
  9. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.01
    0.01304495 = product of:
      0.03913485 = sum of:
        0.03913485 = product of:
          0.0782697 = sum of:
            0.0782697 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0782697 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  10. De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008) 0.01
    0.009735098 = product of:
      0.029205294 = sum of:
        0.029205294 = product of:
          0.05841059 = sum of:
            0.05841059 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05841059 = score(doc=3585,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19538787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.29894686 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 61(2010) no.1, S.205-207 (Jeppe Nicolaisen) Weitere Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 63(2010) H.1/2, S.134-135 (J. Gorraiz u. M. Wieland): "Das Buch entwickelte sich aus einem mehrjährigen Forschungsprojekt mit dem Ziel, den schwer verständlichen quantitativen Kern der Bibliometrie in einem für primär italienische Bibliothekare leichteren historischen und philosophischen Kontext zu vermitteln, wie der Autor im Vorwort erklärt. Dank einer Empfehlung von Eugene Garfield steht dieses Werk nun auch in englischer Übersetzung einer internationalen Leserschaft zur Verfügung. Die über 400 Seiten lange Monografie von de Bellis gibt in acht Kapiteln einen detaillierten und sehr präzisen Überblick über die Bibliometrie und die Zitationsanalyse, ihre Natur und Entwicklung, ihre Kontroverse und Prognose. . . . Das Buch von de Bellis ist sehr empfehlenswert für alle die beabsichtigen, sich mit dieser neuen Wissenschaft zu beschäftigen. Es endet mit folgendem Statement: "Scientometricians have to learn to live in a multidimensional world". Und genau hier liegt die Herausforderung und Schönheit dieses Metiers."
  11. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.01
    0.009224173 = product of:
      0.027672518 = sum of:
        0.027672518 = product of:
          0.055345036 = sum of:
            0.055345036 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055345036 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  12. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01
    0.007826971 = product of:
      0.02348091 = sum of:
        0.02348091 = product of:
          0.04696182 = sum of:
            0.04696182 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04696182 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  13. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.01
    0.007379338 = product of:
      0.022138014 = sum of:
        0.022138014 = product of:
          0.04427603 = sum of:
            0.04427603 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04427603 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  14. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.01
    0.006456921 = product of:
      0.019370763 = sum of:
        0.019370763 = product of:
          0.038741525 = sum of:
            0.038741525 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038741525 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
  15. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.01
    0.006456921 = product of:
      0.019370763 = sum of:
        0.019370763 = product of:
          0.038741525 = sum of:
            0.038741525 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038741525 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
  16. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.01
    0.006456921 = product of:
      0.019370763 = sum of:
        0.019370763 = product of:
          0.038741525 = sum of:
            0.038741525 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038741525 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
  17. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.01
    0.0055345036 = product of:
      0.01660351 = sum of:
        0.01660351 = product of:
          0.03320702 = sum of:
            0.03320702 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03320702 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
  18. Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998) 0.01
    0.0055345036 = product of:
      0.01660351 = sum of:
        0.01660351 = product of:
          0.03320702 = sum of:
            0.03320702 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03320702 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:33:24
  19. wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003) 0.01
    0.0055345036 = product of:
      0.01660351 = sum of:
        0.01660351 = product of:
          0.03320702 = sum of:
            0.03320702 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03320702 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
  20. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.01
    0.0055345036 = product of:
      0.01660351 = sum of:
        0.01660351 = product of:
          0.03320702 = sum of:
            0.03320702 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03320702 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03