Search (31 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010) 0.04
    0.04372152 = product of:
      0.13116455 = sum of:
        0.13116455 = sum of:
          0.09795753 = weight(_text_:2010 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09795753 = score(doc=2945,freq=5.0), product of:
              0.19538787 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040849205 = queryNorm
              0.5013491 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
                2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                  5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
          0.03320702 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03320702 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040849205 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 37(2010) no.2, S.111-120
    Year
    2010
  2. Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004) 0.03
    0.026433557 = product of:
      0.07930067 = sum of:
        0.07930067 = sum of:
          0.051628154 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.051628154 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19538787 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040849205 = queryNorm
              0.2642342 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
          0.027672518 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027672518 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.040849205 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification". In: Knowledge organization. 37(2010) no.2, S.111-120.
    Pages
    S.19-22
  3. Szostak, R.: Universal and domain-specific classifications from an interdisciplinary perspective (2010) 0.02
    0.021768343 = product of:
      0.065305024 = sum of:
        0.065305024 = product of:
          0.13061005 = sum of:
            0.13061005 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13061005 = score(doc=3516,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.19538787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.6684655 = fieldWeight in 3516, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3516)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO Conference, 23-26 February 2010 Rome, Italy. Edited by Claudio Gnoli and Fulvio Mazzocchi
    Year
    2010
  4. Fripp, D.: Using linked data to classify web documents (2010) 0.02
    0.0190473 = product of:
      0.057141896 = sum of:
        0.057141896 = product of:
          0.11428379 = sum of:
            0.11428379 = weight(_text_:2010 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11428379 = score(doc=4172,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.19538787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.5849073 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Aslib proceedings. 62(2010) no.6, S.585 - 595
    Year
    2010
  5. Zeng, M.L.; Panzer, M.; Salaba, A.: Expressing classification schemes with OWL 2 Web Ontology Language : exploring issues and opportunities based on experiments using OWL 2 for three classification schemes 0.01
    0.013767509 = product of:
      0.041302525 = sum of:
        0.041302525 = product of:
          0.08260505 = sum of:
            0.08260505 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08260505 = score(doc=3130,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19538787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.4227747 = fieldWeight in 3130, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3130)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO conference, Rome, 23-26 February 2010, ed. Claudio Gnoli, Indeks, Frankfurt M
  6. Beghtol, C.: Classification theory (2010) 0.01
    0.012646264 = product of:
      0.037938792 = sum of:
        0.037938792 = product of:
          0.075877585 = sum of:
            0.075877585 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075877585 = score(doc=3761,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.19538787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.38834336 = fieldWeight in 3761, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3761)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Year
    2010
  7. Green, R.; Panzer, M.: ¬The ontological character of classes in the Dewey Decimal Classification 0.01
    0.01204657 = product of:
      0.036139708 = sum of:
        0.036139708 = product of:
          0.072279416 = sum of:
            0.072279416 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072279416 = score(doc=3530,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19538787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.36992785 = fieldWeight in 3530, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3530)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO conference, Rome, 23-26 February 2010, ed. Claudio Gnoli, Indeks, Frankfurt M
  8. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.01
    0.011069007 = product of:
      0.03320702 = sum of:
        0.03320702 = product of:
          0.06641404 = sum of:
            0.06641404 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06641404 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  9. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.01
    0.011069007 = product of:
      0.03320702 = sum of:
        0.03320702 = product of:
          0.06641404 = sum of:
            0.06641404 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06641404 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  10. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.01
    0.011069007 = product of:
      0.03320702 = sum of:
        0.03320702 = product of:
          0.06641404 = sum of:
            0.06641404 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06641404 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
  11. Beghtol, C.: Semantic validity : concepts of warrants in bibliographic classification systems (1986) 0.01
    0.008604692 = product of:
      0.025814077 = sum of:
        0.025814077 = product of:
          0.051628154 = sum of:
            0.051628154 = weight(_text_:2010 in 3487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051628154 = score(doc=3487,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19538787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.2642342 = fieldWeight in 3487, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3487)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Kwasnik, B.H.: Semantic warrant: a pivotal concept for our field. In: Knowledge organization. 37(2010) no.2, S.106-110.
  12. Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996) 0.01
    0.007379338 = product of:
      0.022138014 = sum of:
        0.022138014 = product of:
          0.04427603 = sum of:
            0.04427603 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04427603 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 4.1997 21:10:19
  13. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.01
    0.007379338 = product of:
      0.022138014 = sum of:
        0.022138014 = product of:
          0.04427603 = sum of:
            0.04427603 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04427603 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  14. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.01
    0.007379338 = product of:
      0.022138014 = sum of:
        0.022138014 = product of:
          0.04427603 = sum of:
            0.04427603 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04427603 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  15. Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018) 0.01
    0.007379338 = product of:
      0.022138014 = sum of:
        0.022138014 = product of:
          0.04427603 = sum of:
            0.04427603 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04427603 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.1-22
  16. Putkey, T.: Using SKOS to express faceted classification on the Semantic Web (2011) 0.01
    0.0068837544 = product of:
      0.020651262 = sum of:
        0.020651262 = product of:
          0.041302525 = sum of:
            0.041302525 = weight(_text_:2010 in 311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041302525 = score(doc=311,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19538787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.21138735 = fieldWeight in 311, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.7831497 = idf(docFreq=1005, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=311)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper looks at Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) to investigate how a faceted classification can be expressed in RDF and shared on the Semantic Web. Statement of the Problem Faceted classification outlines facets as well as subfacets and facet values. Hierarchical relationships and associative relationships are established in a faceted classification. RDF is used to describe how a specific URI has a relationship to a facet value. Not only does RDF decompose "information into pieces," but by incorporating facet values RDF also given the URI the hierarchical and associative relationships expressed in the faceted classification. Combining faceted classification and RDF creates more knowledge than if the two stood alone. An application understands the subjectpredicate-object relationship in RDF and can display hierarchical and associative relationships based on the object (facet) value. This paper continues to investigate if the above idea is indeed useful, used, and applicable. If so, how can a faceted classification be expressed in RDF? What would this expression look like? Literature Review This paper used the same articles as the paper A Survey of Faceted Classification: History, Uses, Drawbacks and the Semantic Web (Putkey, 2010). In that paper, appropriate resources were discovered by searching in various databases for "faceted classification" and "faceted search," either in the descriptor or title fields. Citations were also followed to find more articles as well as searching the Internet for the same terms. To retrieve the documents about RDF, searches combined "faceted classification" and "RDF, " looking for these words in either the descriptor or title.
  17. Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996) 0.01
    0.006456921 = product of:
      0.019370763 = sum of:
        0.019370763 = product of:
          0.038741525 = sum of:
            0.038741525 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038741525 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
  18. Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001) 0.01
    0.006456921 = product of:
      0.019370763 = sum of:
        0.019370763 = product of:
          0.038741525 = sum of:
            0.038741525 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038741525 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  19. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.01
    0.006456921 = product of:
      0.019370763 = sum of:
        0.019370763 = product of:
          0.038741525 = sum of:
            0.038741525 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038741525 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.22-36
  20. Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.01
    0.0055345036 = product of:
      0.01660351 = sum of:
        0.01660351 = product of:
          0.03320702 = sum of:
            0.03320702 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03320702 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14304696 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040849205 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47