Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Kataloge"
  1. Panizzi, A.K.C.B.: Passages in my official life (1871) 0.03
    0.030203046 = product of:
      0.060406093 = sum of:
        0.060406093 = product of:
          0.120812185 = sum of:
            0.120812185 = weight(_text_:22 in 935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.120812185 = score(doc=935,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15771306 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503733 = queryNorm
                0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 935, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=935)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2007 12:05:26
    22. 7.2007 12:08:24
  2. Zerbst, H.-J.; Kaptein, O.: Gegenwärtiger Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Sacherschließung : Auswertung einer Umfrage an deutschen wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1993) 0.02
    0.017882803 = product of:
      0.035765607 = sum of:
        0.035765607 = product of:
          0.14306243 = sum of:
            0.14306243 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14306243 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.38182697 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503733 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???
  3. Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American Cataloging Alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2003) 0.02
    0.015254841 = product of:
      0.030509682 = sum of:
        0.030509682 = product of:
          0.061019365 = sum of:
            0.061019365 = weight(_text_:22 in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061019365 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15771306 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503733 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.3-22
  4. Steinhagen, E.N.: Historical perspective of a union catalog in Chile : authorities and periodicals (2003) 0.02
    0.015254841 = product of:
      0.030509682 = sum of:
        0.030509682 = product of:
          0.061019365 = sum of:
            0.061019365 = weight(_text_:22 in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061019365 = score(doc=4064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15771306 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503733 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 7.2006 20:06:22
  5. Thomas, S.E.: ¬The Program for Cooperative Cataloging : backstory and future potential (2020) 0.01
    0.012324148 = product of:
      0.024648296 = sum of:
        0.024648296 = product of:
          0.04929659 = sum of:
            0.04929659 = weight(_text_:1994 in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04929659 = score(doc=124,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16943114 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7620156 = idf(docFreq=2792, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503733 = queryNorm
                0.29095355 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7620156 = idf(docFreq=2792, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In 1988 the Library of Congress and eight library participants undertook a two-year pilot known as the National Coordinated Cataloging Program (NCCP) to increase the number of quality bibliographic records. Subsequently the Bibliographic Services Study Committee reviewed the pilot. Discussions held at the Library of Congress (LC) and in other fora resulted in the creation of the Cooperative Cataloging Council, and, ultimately, the establishment of the Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) in 1994. The conditions that contributed to a successful approach to shared cataloging are described. The article concludes with considerations for expanding the future effectiveness of the PCC.
  6. Eversberg, B.: ADV und Zetteldruck : ein Widerspruch? (1975) 0.01
    0.012203873 = product of:
      0.024407746 = sum of:
        0.024407746 = product of:
          0.048815493 = sum of:
            0.048815493 = weight(_text_:22 in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048815493 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15771306 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503733 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 22(1975) H.5, S.387-390
  7. Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American cataloging alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2002) 0.01
    0.010678389 = product of:
      0.021356778 = sum of:
        0.021356778 = product of:
          0.042713556 = sum of:
            0.042713556 = weight(_text_:22 in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042713556 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15771306 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503733 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 35(2002) nos.1/2, S.3-22
  8. Cooperative cataloging : past, present, and future (1993) 0.01
    0.010563555 = product of:
      0.02112711 = sum of:
        0.02112711 = product of:
          0.04225422 = sum of:
            0.04225422 = weight(_text_:1994 in 375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04225422 = score(doc=375,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16943114 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7620156 = idf(docFreq=2792, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503733 = queryNorm
                0.24938875 = fieldWeight in 375, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7620156 = idf(docFreq=2792, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=375)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: IASLIC bulletin 39(1994) no.4, S.190-191 (D. Gosh). - Auch als: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 17(1993) nos.3/4
  9. Takawashi, T.: Cataloging in Japan : relationship between Japanese and Western cataloging rules (2002) 0.01
    0.010563555 = product of:
      0.02112711 = sum of:
        0.02112711 = product of:
          0.04225422 = sum of:
            0.04225422 = weight(_text_:1994 in 5490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04225422 = score(doc=5490,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16943114 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7620156 = idf(docFreq=2792, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503733 = queryNorm
                0.24938875 = fieldWeight in 5490, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7620156 = idf(docFreq=2792, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5490)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In 1943 the Japanese League of Young Librarians published Nippon Catalog Rules (NCR1942) based on ALA 1908, and adopted the author main-entry system for Japanese and Western materials. After World War II, the Japan Library Association (JLA) compiled and published NCR1952, based on ALA 1949 and LC 1949 but maintained the author main-entry system. The main-entry system was then replaced by an alternative heading method, which came to be known as the Description-Independent-System (DIS). NCR1965 adopted the main entry principle, which was based on the Paris Principles of 1961. NCR1977 was compiled and published by the JLA Cataloging Committee and based upon a "no-main-entry principle." Then in 1987, the Committee published the standard edition of the rules, which was completely compatible with the International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD). NCR1987R was published in 1994 and NCR1987R01 in 2001, which included revised "Chapter 9: Computer Files," devised according to ISBD(ER).
  10. Pettee, J.: ¬The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog (1985) 0.01
    0.0061019366 = product of:
      0.012203873 = sum of:
        0.012203873 = product of:
          0.024407746 = sum of:
            0.024407746 = weight(_text_:22 in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024407746 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15771306 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503733 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Original in: Pettee, J.: The history and theory of the alphabetical subject approach to books. New York: Wilson 1946. S.22-25.
  11. Laaff, M.: Googles genialer Urahn (2011) 0.00
    0.0038137103 = product of:
      0.0076274206 = sum of:
        0.0076274206 = product of:
          0.015254841 = sum of:
            0.015254841 = weight(_text_:22 in 4610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015254841 = score(doc=4610,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15771306 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04503733 = queryNorm
                0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 4610, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4610)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    24.10.2008 14:19:22