-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014)
0.02
0.018192505 = product of:
0.03638501 = sum of:
0.03638501 = product of:
0.07277002 = sum of:
0.07277002 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07277002 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044758573 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 3.2014 19:13:22
-
Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.; Leydesdorff, L.: BRICS countries and scientific excellence : a bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers (2015)
0.01
0.012556243 = product of:
0.025112486 = sum of:
0.025112486 = product of:
0.05022497 = sum of:
0.05022497 = weight(_text_:1990 in 2047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05022497 = score(doc=2047,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20172533 = queryWeight, product of:
4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
0.044758573 = queryNorm
0.248977 = fieldWeight in 2047, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2047)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) are notable for their increasing participation in science and technology. The governments of these countries have been boosting their investments in research and development to become part of the group of nations doing research at a world-class level. This study investigates the development of the BRICS countries in the domain of top-cited papers (top 10% and 1% most frequently cited papers) between 1990 and 2010. To assess the extent to which these countries have become important players at the top level, we compare the BRICS countries with the top-performing countries worldwide. As the analyses of the (annual) growth rates show, with the exception of Russia, the BRICS countries have increased their output in terms of most frequently cited papers at a higher rate than the top-cited countries worldwide. By way of additional analysis, we generate coauthorship networks among authors of highly cited papers for 4 time points to view changes in BRICS participation (1995, 2000, 2005, and 2010). Here, the results show that all BRICS countries succeeded in becoming part of this network, whereby the Chinese collaboration activities focus on the US.
-
Bornmann, L.; Ye, A.; Ye, F.: Identifying landmark publications in the long run using field-normalized citation data (2018)
0.01
0.012556243 = product of:
0.025112486 = sum of:
0.025112486 = product of:
0.05022497 = sum of:
0.05022497 = weight(_text_:1990 in 4196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05022497 = score(doc=4196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20172533 = queryWeight, product of:
4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
0.044758573 = queryNorm
0.248977 = fieldWeight in 4196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this paper is to propose an approach for identifying landmark papers in the long run. These publications reach a very high level of citation impact and are able to remain on this level across many citing years. In recent years, several studies have been published which deal with the citation history of publications and try to identify landmark publications. Design/methodology/approach In contrast to other studies published hitherto, this study is based on a broad data set with papers published between 1980 and 1990 for identifying the landmark papers. The authors analyzed the citation histories of about five million papers across 25 years. Findings The results of this study reveal that 1,013 papers (less than 0.02 percent) are "outstandingly cited" in the long run. The cluster analyses of the papers show that they received the high impact level very soon after publication and remained on this level over decades. Only a slight impact decline is visible over the years. Originality/value For practical reasons, approaches for identifying landmark papers should be as simple as possible. The approach proposed in this study is based on standard methods in bibliometrics.
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.01
0.012128337 = product of:
0.024256675 = sum of:
0.024256675 = product of:
0.04851335 = sum of:
0.04851335 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04851335 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044758573 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
-
Bornmann, L.: How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics : the statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers (2013)
0.01
0.009096253 = product of:
0.018192505 = sum of:
0.018192505 = product of:
0.03638501 = sum of:
0.03638501 = weight(_text_:22 in 656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03638501 = score(doc=656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044758573 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=656)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:44:17
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019)
0.01
0.009096253 = product of:
0.018192505 = sum of:
0.018192505 = product of:
0.03638501 = sum of:
0.03638501 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03638501 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044758573 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8. 1.2019 18:22:45
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011)
0.01
0.007580211 = product of:
0.015160422 = sum of:
0.015160422 = product of:
0.030320844 = sum of:
0.030320844 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030320844 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044758573 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 12:51:07
