Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Begriffstheorie"
  1. Grolier, E. de: From theories to concepts and from facts to words (1990) 0.06
    0.063530125 = product of:
      0.12706025 = sum of:
        0.12706025 = product of:
          0.2541205 = sum of:
            0.2541205 = weight(_text_:1990 in 3198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2541205 = score(doc=3198,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.20172533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                1.2597351 = fieldWeight in 3198, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3198)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International social science journal. 42(1990) no.2, S.241-251
    Year
    1990
  2. Jorna, R.J.: Knowledge representation and symbols in the mind : an analysis in cognitive psychology (1990) 0.04
    0.04305894 = product of:
      0.08611788 = sum of:
        0.08611788 = product of:
          0.17223576 = sum of:
            0.17223576 = weight(_text_:1990 in 7305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17223576 = score(doc=7305,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.20172533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.85381323 = fieldWeight in 7305, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7305)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Year
    1990
  3. Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002) 0.04
    0.040272906 = product of:
      0.08054581 = sum of:
        0.08054581 = sum of:
          0.05022497 = weight(_text_:1990 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05022497 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20172533 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044758573 = queryNorm
              0.248977 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
          0.030320844 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030320844 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044758573 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A main goal of recent studies in semantics is to integrate into conceptual structures the models of representation used in linguistics, logic, and/or artificial intelligence. A fundamental problem resides in the need to structure knowledge and then to check the validity of constructed representations. We propose associating logical properties with relationships by introducing the relationships into a typed and functional system of specifcations. This makes it possible to compare conceptual representations against the relationships established between the concepts. The mandatory condition to validate such a conceptual representation is consistency. The semantic system proposed is based an a structured set of semantic primitives-types, relations, and properties-based an a global model of language processing, Applicative and Cognitive Grammar (ACG) (Desc16s, 1990), and an extension of this model to terminology (Jouis & Mustafa 1995, 1996, 1997). The ACG postulates three levels of representation of languages, including a cognitive level. At this level, the meanings of lexical predicates are represented by semantic cognitive schemes. From this perspective, we propose a set of semantic concepts, which defines an organized system of meanings. Relations are part of a specification network based an a general terminological scheure (i.e., a coherent system of meanings of relations). In such a system, a specific relation may be characterized as to its: (1) functional type (the semantic type of arguments of the relation); (2) algebraic properties (reflexivity, symmetry, transitivity, etc.); and (3) combinatorial relations with other entities in the same context (for instance, the part of the text where a concept is defined).
    Date
    1.12.2002 11:12:22
  4. Eckes, T.: Knowledge structures and knowledge representation : psychological models of conceptual order (1990) 0.04
    0.03690766 = product of:
      0.07381532 = sum of:
        0.07381532 = product of:
          0.14763065 = sum of:
            0.14763065 = weight(_text_:1990 in 861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14763065 = score(doc=861,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.20172533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.7318399 = fieldWeight in 861, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=861)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Year
    1990
  5. Herrmann, T.: Sprechen und Sprachverstehen (1990) 0.04
    0.03690766 = product of:
      0.07381532 = sum of:
        0.07381532 = product of:
          0.14763065 = sum of:
            0.14763065 = weight(_text_:1990 in 3163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14763065 = score(doc=3163,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.20172533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.7318399 = fieldWeight in 3163, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3163)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Year
    1990
  6. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987) 0.02
    0.02122459 = product of:
      0.04244918 = sum of:
        0.04244918 = product of:
          0.08489836 = sum of:
            0.08489836 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08489836 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.9-22
  7. Grabowski, J.: ¬Der propositionale Ansatz der Textverständlichkeit : Kohärenz, Interessantheit und Behalten (1991) 0.02
    0.020089988 = product of:
      0.040179975 = sum of:
        0.040179975 = product of:
          0.08035995 = sum of:
            0.08035995 = weight(_text_:1990 in 24) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08035995 = score(doc=24,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20172533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.3983632 = fieldWeight in 24, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=24)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Zugl. Diss. U Mannheim 1990 u.d.T.: Zur Überprüfung der Textverständlichkeitskonzeption von Knitsch & Wipond (1979)
  8. Wüster, E.: Begriffs- und Themaklassifikation : Unterschiede in ihrem Wesen und in ihrer Anwendung (1971) 0.02
    0.018192505 = product of:
      0.03638501 = sum of:
        0.03638501 = product of:
          0.07277002 = sum of:
            0.07277002 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07277002 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971) H.3, S.98-104 (T.1); H.4, S.143-150 (T.2)
  9. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010) 0.01
    0.012128337 = product of:
      0.024256675 = sum of:
        0.024256675 = product of:
          0.04851335 = sum of:
            0.04851335 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04851335 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  10. Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994) 0.01
    0.010612295 = product of:
      0.02122459 = sum of:
        0.02122459 = product of:
          0.04244918 = sum of:
            0.04244918 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04244918 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:17:40
  11. Bauer, G.: ¬Die vielseitigen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten des Kategorienprinzips bei der Wissensorganisation (2006) 0.01
    0.010612295 = product of:
      0.02122459 = sum of:
        0.02122459 = product of:
          0.04244918 = sum of:
            0.04244918 = weight(_text_:22 in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04244918 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-33
  12. Dahlberg, I.: Zur Begriffskultur in den Sozialwissenschaften : Evaluation einer Herausforderung (2006) 0.01
    0.010044994 = product of:
      0.020089988 = sum of:
        0.020089988 = product of:
          0.040179975 = sum of:
            0.040179975 = weight(_text_:1990 in 3128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040179975 = score(doc=3128,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20172533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.1991816 = fieldWeight in 3128, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3128)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Aufgrund eines Vortrags über Begriffs- und Definitionstheorie, den ich bei der Tagung über Begriffsanalyse in Darmstadt 1986 gehalten hatte (Dahlberg 1987), wandte sich der damalige Mitherausgeber der Zeitschrift Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften, Dr. Rainer Greshoff, 1990 an mich mit der Bitte, einen ähnlichen Beitrag als Hauptartikel für seine Zeitschrift zu schreiben. Ich sagte zu mit der Absicht im Hinterkopf, dabei auch meine Erfahrungen mit der sozial-wissenschaftlichen Terminologie, die ich bei COCTA, dem Committee for Conceptual and Terminological Analysis (Vorsitz Prof. Dr. Fred Riggs, Hawaii) (Riggs 1982) gemacht hatte, einzubringen. Hinzu kam, dass mir gerade zu diesem Zeitpunkt das Werk von Stefan Andreski in die Hände gefallen war, betitelt: "Die Hexenmeister der Sozialwissenschaften. Missbrauch, Mode und Manipulation einer Wissenschaft", (Andreski 1974) der sozusagen "kein Blatt vor den Mund nimmt" und überaus mutig und an vielen Beispielen die Misere der sozialwissenschaftlichen Terminologie offenbar macht. Ich hoffte daher, in einem entsprechenden Beitrag mehr Bewusstsein für eine begriffsorientierte, systematische Terminologie der Sozialwissenschaften zu wecken. In gewisser Weise war für mich dabei die Lösung von Prof. Riggs mit seiner "Onomantik" (Riggs 1985) vorbildlich. Er ging nämlich davon aus, dass der sog. semasiologische Ansatz, bei dem nach der Bedeutung eines Wortes gefragt wird, unbrauchbar für sein Verständnis sei (und das nicht nur in den Sozialwissenschaften), man müsse vielmehr umgekehrt onomasiologisch vorgehen und sich zunächst über einen Begriff klar werden, der mit einem Wort (oder einem Wort in einem Kontext) verbunden ist und seine mögliche Definition finden und dann erst dafür eine Benennung suchen. Aus Zeitmangel entstand mein Beitrag erst 1995. Herr Dr. Greshoff konnte - entsprechend der Methode seiner Zeitschrift - zu meinem Beitrag eine größere Anzahl von Kritikern finden und diese dann auch noch durch eine Replik der Autorin erwidern lassen und mit einer Metakritik eines Nichtinvolvierten das Ganze beenden. In meinem Fall waren es 27 Persönlichkeiten aus 10 verschiedenen Disziplinen und Herr Prof. Dr. Endruweit als Metakritiker. Der Beitrag umfasste die Seiten 3-91 (DIN A4 Format) in Heft 1-1996 unter dem Titel "Zur Begriffskultur in den Sozialwissenschaften. Lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen?" (Dahlberg 1996). Ich war überzeugt, dass sich ihre Probleme mit meiner vorgeschlagenen Methode lösen lassen. Doch meine Kritiker waren es leider nicht. Und über das Warum - davon wird mein Vortrag heute handeln.
  13. Treude, L.: ¬Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation : über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung (2013) 0.01
    0.009096253 = product of:
      0.018192505 = sum of:
        0.018192505 = product of:
          0.03638501 = sum of:
            0.03638501 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03638501 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx
  14. Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012) 0.01
    0.007580211 = product of:
      0.015160422 = sum of:
        0.015160422 = product of:
          0.030320844 = sum of:
            0.030320844 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030320844 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:11:25
  15. Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014) 0.01
    0.007580211 = product of:
      0.015160422 = sum of:
        0.015160422 = product of:
          0.030320844 = sum of:
            0.030320844 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030320844 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  16. Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007) 0.01
    0.007580211 = product of:
      0.015160422 = sum of:
        0.015160422 = product of:
          0.030320844 = sum of:
            0.030320844 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030320844 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11.12.2019 19:00:22