Search (144 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.15
    0.15362689 = product of:
      0.30725378 = sum of:
        0.30725378 = sum of:
          0.22235543 = weight(_text_:1990 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.22235543 = score(doc=6902,freq=5.0), product of:
              0.20172533 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044758573 = queryNorm
              1.1022682 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                  5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.08489836 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08489836 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044758573 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.5, S.368-375
    Year
    1990
  2. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.15
    0.15362689 = product of:
      0.30725378 = sum of:
        0.30725378 = sum of:
          0.22235543 = weight(_text_:1990 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.22235543 = score(doc=4689,freq=5.0), product of:
              0.20172533 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044758573 = queryNorm
              1.1022682 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
                2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                  5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
          0.08489836 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08489836 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044758573 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.5, S.376-386
    Year
    1990
  3. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.05
    0.048327483 = product of:
      0.09665497 = sum of:
        0.09665497 = sum of:
          0.06026996 = weight(_text_:1990 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06026996 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20172533 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044758573 = queryNorm
              0.2987724 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.03638501 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03638501 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044758573 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Citation rates are becoming increasingly important in judging the research quality of journals, institutions and departments, and individual faculty. This paper looks at the pattern of citations across different management science journals and over time. A stochastic model is proposed which views the generating mechanism of citations as a gamma mixture of Poisson processes generating overall a negative binomial distribution. This is tested empirically with a large sample of papers published in 1990 from six management science journals and found to fit well. The model is extended to include obsolescence, i.e., that the citation rate for a paper varies over its cited lifetime. This leads to the additional citations distribution which shows that future citations are a linear function of past citations with a time-dependent and decreasing slope. This is also verified empirically in a way that allows different obsolescence functions to be fitted to the data. Conclusions concerning the predictability of future citations, and future research in this area are discussed.
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  4. Stock, W.G.: Themenanalytische informetrische Methoden (1990) 0.04
    0.04305894 = product of:
      0.08611788 = sum of:
        0.08611788 = product of:
          0.17223576 = sum of:
            0.17223576 = weight(_text_:1990 in 5065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17223576 = score(doc=5065,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.20172533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.85381323 = fieldWeight in 5065, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5065)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Year
    1990
  5. Chen, C.: CiteSpace II : detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2006) 0.04
    0.040272906 = product of:
      0.08054581 = sum of:
        0.08054581 = sum of:
          0.05022497 = weight(_text_:1990 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05022497 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20172533 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044758573 = queryNorm
              0.248977 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
          0.030320844 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030320844 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044758573 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the latest development of a generic approach to detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. The work makes substantial theoretical and methodological contributions to progressive knowledge domain visualization. A specialty is conceptualized and visualized as a time-variant duality between two fundamental concepts in information science: research fronts and intellectual bases. A research front is defined as an emergent and transient grouping of concepts and underlying research issues. The intellectual base of a research front is its citation and co-citation footprint in scientific literature - an evolving network of scientific publications cited by research-front concepts. Kleinberg's (2002) burst-detection algorithm is adapted to identify emergent research-front concepts. Freeman's (1979) betweenness centrality metric is used to highlight potential pivotal points of paradigm shift over time. Two complementary visualization views are designed and implemented: cluster views and time-zone views. The contributions of the approach are that (a) the nature of an intellectual base is algorithmically and temporally identified by emergent research-front terms, (b) the value of a co-citation cluster is explicitly interpreted in terms of research-front concepts, and (c) visually prominent and algorithmically detected pivotal points substantially reduce the complexity of a visualized network. The modeling and visualization process is implemented in CiteSpace II, a Java application, and applied to the analysis of two research fields: mass extinction (1981-2004) and terrorism (1990-2003). Prominent trends and pivotal points in visualized networks were verified in collaboration with domain experts, who are the authors of pivotal-point articles. Practical implications of the work are discussed. A number of challenges and opportunities for future studies are identified.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:11:05
  6. Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬The h-index : a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator (2010) 0.04
    0.040272906 = product of:
      0.08054581 = sum of:
        0.08054581 = sum of:
          0.05022497 = weight(_text_:1990 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05022497 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20172533 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044758573 = queryNorm
              0.248977 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
          0.030320844 = weight(_text_:22 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030320844 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044758573 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This review aims to show, broadly, how the h-index has become a subject of widespread debate, how it has spawned many variants and diverse applications since first introduced in 2005 and some of the issues in its use. Design/methodology/approach - The review drew on a range of material published in 1990 or so sources published since 2005. From these sources, a number of themes were identified and discussed ranging from the h-index's advantages to which citation database might be selected for its calculation. Findings - The analysis shows how the h-index has quickly established itself as a major subject of interest in the field of bibliometrics. Study of the index ranges from its mathematical underpinning to a range of variants perceived to address the indexes' shortcomings. The review illustrates how widely the index has been applied but also how care must be taken in its application. Originality/value - The use of bibliometric indicators to measure research performance continues, with the h-index as its latest addition. The use of the h-index, its variants and many applications to which it has been put are still at the exploratory stage. The review shows the breadth and diversity of this research and the need to verify the veracity of the h-index by more studies.
    Date
    8. 1.2011 19:22:13
  7. Wang, C.: Bibliometrics : a textbook (1990) 0.04
    0.03690766 = product of:
      0.07381532 = sum of:
        0.07381532 = product of:
          0.14763065 = sum of:
            0.14763065 = weight(_text_:1990 in 5040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14763065 = score(doc=5040,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.20172533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.7318399 = fieldWeight in 5040, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5040)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Year
    1990
  8. Sellen, M.K.: Bibliometrics : an annotated bibliography 1970-1990 (1993) 0.04
    0.03515748 = product of:
      0.07031496 = sum of:
        0.07031496 = product of:
          0.14062992 = sum of:
            0.14062992 = weight(_text_:1990 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14062992 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20172533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.6971356 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990) 0.03
    0.03288681 = product of:
      0.06577362 = sum of:
        0.06577362 = product of:
          0.13154724 = sum of:
            0.13154724 = weight(_text_:1990 in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13154724 = score(doc=1515,freq=7.0), product of:
                0.20172533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.65211064 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
                  2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
                    7.0 = termFreq=7.0
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    Z669.8.E38 1990
    LCC
    Z669.8.E38 1990
    Year
    1990
  10. Borgman, C.L.; Furner, J.: Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (2002) 0.03
    0.02609766 = product of:
      0.05219532 = sum of:
        0.05219532 = product of:
          0.10439064 = sum of:
            0.10439064 = weight(_text_:1990 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10439064 = score(doc=4291,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.20172533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.517489 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Why devote an ARIST chapter to scholarly communication and bibliometrics, and why now? Bibliometrics already is a frequently covered ARIST topic, with chapters such as that by White and McCain (1989) on bibliometrics generally, White and McCain (1997) on visualization of literatures, Wilson and Hood (2001) on informetric laws, and Tabah (2001) on literature dynamics. Similarly, scholarly communication has been addressed in other ARIST chapters such as Bishop and Star (1996) on social informatics and digital libraries, Schamber (1994) on relevance and information behavior, and many earlier chapters on information needs and uses. More than a decade ago, the first author addressed the intersection of scholarly communication and bibliometrics with a journal special issue and an edited book (Borgman, 1990; Borgman & Paisley, 1989), and she recently examined interim developments (Borgman, 2000a, 2000c). This review covers the decade (1990-2000) since the comprehensive 1990 volume, citing earlier works only when necessary to explain the foundation for recent developments.
  11. Nicholls, P.T.: Empirical validation of Lotka's law (1986) 0.02
    0.024256675 = product of:
      0.04851335 = sum of:
        0.04851335 = product of:
          0.0970267 = sum of:
            0.0970267 = weight(_text_:22 in 5509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0970267 = score(doc=5509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 22(1986), S.417-419
  12. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02
    0.024256675 = product of:
      0.04851335 = sum of:
        0.04851335 = product of:
          0.0970267 = sum of:
            0.0970267 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0970267 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  13. Fiala, J.: Information flood : fiction and reality (1987) 0.02
    0.024256675 = product of:
      0.04851335 = sum of:
        0.04851335 = product of:
          0.0970267 = sum of:
            0.0970267 = weight(_text_:22 in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0970267 = score(doc=1080,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Thermochimica acta. 110(1987), S.11-22
  14. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.02
    0.021440074 = product of:
      0.042880148 = sum of:
        0.042880148 = product of:
          0.085760295 = sum of:
            0.085760295 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.085760295 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  15. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02
    0.021440074 = product of:
      0.042880148 = sum of:
        0.042880148 = product of:
          0.085760295 = sum of:
            0.085760295 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.085760295 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  16. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.02
    0.02122459 = product of:
      0.04244918 = sum of:
        0.04244918 = product of:
          0.08489836 = sum of:
            0.08489836 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08489836 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  17. Chung, Y.-K.: Bradford distribution and core authors in classification systems literature (1994) 0.02
    0.020089988 = product of:
      0.040179975 = sum of:
        0.040179975 = product of:
          0.08035995 = sum of:
            0.08035995 = weight(_text_:1990 in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08035995 = score(doc=5066,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20172533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.3983632 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Bradford's law of scatter was applied to the analysis of the authors of source documents on the subject of classification schemes, published in core periodicals over the period 1981-1990. Results indicated that: core authors of the international classification system literature are Library of Congress, M. Dewey, S. Ranganathan, J. Comaroni, A. Neelameghan, L. Chan and K. Markey; the highly cited authors are linked either to the developers of the classification schemes or to a research centre, or else they authored the most frequently cited books; and the data conforms to Bradford's Law of Scatter
  18. Xiulan, H.: Research into the progress of citations for Chinese scientific and technical literature (1998) 0.02
    0.020089988 = product of:
      0.040179975 = sum of:
        0.040179975 = product of:
          0.08035995 = sum of:
            0.08035995 = weight(_text_:1990 in 5119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08035995 = score(doc=5119,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20172533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.3983632 = fieldWeight in 5119, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.506965 = idf(docFreq=1325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5119)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a study in which 6505 papers from 23 Chinese scientific and technical journals published in the 7 years from 1990 to 1996 were investigated. The quantity, languages and types of citations were analyzed and compared with data from the 1970s. In this way the progress of citations for Chinese scientific and technical journal literature can be seen
  19. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.02
    0.018192505 = product of:
      0.03638501 = sum of:
        0.03638501 = product of:
          0.07277002 = sum of:
            0.07277002 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07277002 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
  20. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.02
    0.018192505 = product of:
      0.03638501 = sum of:
        0.03638501 = product of:
          0.07277002 = sum of:
            0.07277002 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07277002 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1567369 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044758573 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22

Years

Languages

  • e 131
  • d 10
  • ? 1
  • chi 1
  • ro 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 139
  • m 5
  • b 1
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…