Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Burrell, Q.L."
  1. Burrell, Q.L.: On Egghe's version of continuous concentration theory (2006) 0.02
    0.017769508 = product of:
      0.053308524 = sum of:
        0.053308524 = product of:
          0.10661705 = sum of:
            0.10661705 = weight(_text_:2005 in 4903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10661705 = score(doc=4903,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.54114735 = fieldWeight in 4903, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4903)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In a recent article, Egghe (2005) discussed what he terms Lorenz concentration theory, covering the Lorenz curve and concentration measures such as the coefficient of variation and the Theil and Gini coefficients. In this note, we point out that neither the curve construction nor the concentration measures conform to the standard statistical/econometric definitions. We here give the standard formulations and apply them to the (truncated) Pareto distributions that are the subject of Egghe's (2005) article. We also interpret Egghe's usage.
  2. Burrell, Q.L.: Measuring similarity of concentration between different informetric distributions : two new approaches (2005) 0.01
    0.014900185 = product of:
      0.044700556 = sum of:
        0.044700556 = product of:
          0.08940111 = sum of:
            0.08940111 = weight(_text_:2005 in 3410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08940111 = score(doc=3410,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.45376584 = fieldWeight in 3410, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3410)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.7, S.704-714
    Year
    2005
  3. Burrell, Q.L.: Egghe's construction of Lorenz curves resolved (2007) 0.01
    0.009423705 = product of:
      0.028271113 = sum of:
        0.028271113 = product of:
          0.056542225 = sum of:
            0.056542225 = weight(_text_:2005 in 624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056542225 = score(doc=624,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.2869867 = fieldWeight in 624, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=624)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In a recent article (Burrell, 2006), the author pointed out that the version of Lorenz concentration theory presented by Egghe (2005a, 2005b) does not conform to the classical statistical/econometric approach. Rousseau (2007) asserts confusion on our part and a failure to grasp Egghe's construction, even though we simply reported what Egghe stated. Here the author shows that Egghe's construction rather than including the standard case, as claimed by Rousseau, actually leads to the Leimkuhler curve of the dual function, in the sense of Egghe. (Note that here we distinguish between the Lorenz curve, a convex form arising from ranking from smallest to largest, and the Leimkuhler curve, a concave form arising from ranking from largest to smallest. The two presentations are equivalent. See Burrell, 1991, 2005; Rousseau, 2007.)
  4. Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003) 0.01
    0.007193619 = product of:
      0.021580856 = sum of:
        0.021580856 = product of:
          0.043161713 = sum of:
            0.043161713 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043161713 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:22:48
  5. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.01
    0.006165959 = product of:
      0.018497877 = sum of:
        0.018497877 = product of:
          0.036995754 = sum of:
            0.036995754 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036995754 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05