-
New Web Citation Index (2004)
0.01
0.009423705 = product of:
0.028271113 = sum of:
0.028271113 = product of:
0.056542225 = sum of:
0.056542225 = weight(_text_:2005 in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056542225 = score(doc=2270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550987 = queryNorm
0.2869867 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Philadelphia, PA USA-London UK-Princeton, NJ February, 25, 2004 - Today, Thomson ISI and NEC Laboratories America (NEC) announced their collaboration to create a comprehensive, multidisciplinary citation index for Web-based scholarly resources. The new Web Citation Index(tm) will combine a suite of technologies developed by NEC, including "autonomous citation indexing" tools from NEC's CiteSeer environment, with the capabilities underlying ISI Web of KnowledgeSM. Thomson ISI editors will carefully monitor the quality of this new resource to ensure all indexed material meets the Thomson ISI high-quality standards. During 2004, Thomson ISI and NEC will operate a pilot of the new resource to receive feedback from the scientific and scholarly community. Full access to the index is projected for early 2005. When fully operational, the new resource will be a unique content collection within ISI Web of Knowledge. It will complement the Thomson ISI Web of Science(r), and provide researchers with a new gateway to discovery 4/3 using citation relationships among Web-based documents, such as pre-prints, proceedings, and "open access" research publications.
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.01
0.00822128 = product of:
0.024663838 = sum of:
0.024663838 = product of:
0.049327675 = sum of:
0.049327675 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049327675 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550987 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
-
Thelwall, M.; Vaughan, L.; Björneborn, L.: Webometrics (2004)
0.01
0.007853087 = product of:
0.023559261 = sum of:
0.023559261 = product of:
0.047118522 = sum of:
0.047118522 = weight(_text_:2005 in 4279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047118522 = score(doc=4279,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550987 = queryNorm
0.23915559 = fieldWeight in 4279, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4279)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 39(2005), S.81-138
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.D.: What do citation counts measure? : a review of studies on citing behavior (2008)
0.01
0.007853087 = product of:
0.023559261 = sum of:
0.023559261 = product of:
0.047118522 = sum of:
0.047118522 = weight(_text_:2005 in 1729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047118522 = score(doc=1729,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550987 = queryNorm
0.23915559 = fieldWeight in 1729, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1729)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present a narrative review of studies on the citing behavior of scientists, covering mainly research published in the last 15 years. Based on the results of these studies, the paper seeks to answer the question of the extent to which scientists are motivated to cite a publication not only to acknowledge intellectual and cognitive influences of scientific peers, but also for other, possibly non-scientific, reasons. Design/methodology/approach - The review covers research published from the early 1960s up to mid-2005 (approximately 30 studies on citing behavior-reporting results in about 40 publications). Findings - The general tendency of the results of the empirical studies makes it clear that citing behavior is not motivated solely by the wish to acknowledge intellectual and cognitive influences of colleague scientists, since the individual studies reveal also other, in part non-scientific, factors that play a part in the decision to cite. However, the results of the studies must also be deemed scarcely reliable: the studies vary widely in design, and their results can hardly be replicated. Many of the studies have methodological weaknesses. Furthermore, there is evidence that the different motivations of citers are "not so different or 'randomly given' to such an extent that the phenomenon of citation would lose its role as a reliable measure of impact". Originality/value - Given the increasing importance of evaluative bibliometrics in the world of scholarship, the question "What do citation counts measure?" is a particularly relevant and topical issue.
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.01
0.007193619 = product of:
0.021580856 = sum of:
0.021580856 = product of:
0.043161713 = sum of:
0.043161713 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043161713 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550987 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.01
0.007193619 = product of:
0.021580856 = sum of:
0.021580856 = product of:
0.043161713 = sum of:
0.043161713 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043161713 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550987 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
-
Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020)
0.01
0.007193619 = product of:
0.021580856 = sum of:
0.021580856 = product of:
0.043161713 = sum of:
0.043161713 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043161713 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550987 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 17.11.2020 12:22:59
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.01
0.006165959 = product of:
0.018497877 = sum of:
0.018497877 = product of:
0.036995754 = sum of:
0.036995754 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036995754 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550987 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.01
0.006165959 = product of:
0.018497877 = sum of:
0.018497877 = product of:
0.036995754 = sum of:
0.036995754 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036995754 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550987 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
-
wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003)
0.01
0.006165959 = product of:
0.018497877 = sum of:
0.018497877 = product of:
0.036995754 = sum of:
0.036995754 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036995754 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550987 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.01
0.006165959 = product of:
0.018497877 = sum of:
0.018497877 = product of:
0.036995754 = sum of:
0.036995754 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036995754 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550987 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.01
0.006165959 = product of:
0.018497877 = sum of:
0.018497877 = product of:
0.036995754 = sum of:
0.036995754 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036995754 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550987 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.01
0.006165959 = product of:
0.018497877 = sum of:
0.018497877 = product of:
0.036995754 = sum of:
0.036995754 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036995754 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550987 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014)
0.01
0.006165959 = product of:
0.018497877 = sum of:
0.018497877 = product of:
0.036995754 = sum of:
0.036995754 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036995754 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550987 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 16:52:04
-
Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008)
0.01
0.0051382994 = product of:
0.015414898 = sum of:
0.015414898 = product of:
0.030829797 = sum of:
0.030829797 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030829797 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550987 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2008 12:54:12
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.00
0.00411064 = product of:
0.012331919 = sum of:
0.012331919 = product of:
0.024663838 = sum of:
0.024663838 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024663838 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04550987 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
