Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

0.016322337 = product of:
  0.04896701 = sum of:
    0.04896701 = product of:
      0.09793402 = sum of:
        0.09793402 = weight(_text_:2005 in 1173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09793402 = score(doc=1173,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.49707562 = fieldWeight in 1173, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1173)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Popular commercial on-line services such as Google, e-Bay, Amazon, and Netflix have evolved quickly over the last decade to help people find what they want, developing information retrieval strategies such as usefully ranked results, spelling correction, and recommender systems. Online library catalogs (OPACs), in contrast, have changed little and are notoriously difficult for patrons to use (University of California Libraries, 2005). Over the past year (June 2005 to the present), the Melvyl Recommender Project (California Digital Library, 2005) has been exploring methods and feasibility of closing the gap between features that library patrons want and have come to expect from information retrieval systems and what libraries are currently equipped to deliver. The project team conducted exploratory work in five topic areas: relevance ranking, auto-correction, use of a text-based discovery system, user interface strategies, and recommending. This article focuses specifically on the recommending portion of the project and potential extensions to that work.

0.009423705 = product of:
  0.028271113 = sum of:
    0.028271113 = product of:
      0.056542225 = sum of:
        0.056542225 = weight(_text_:2005 in 3230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056542225 = score(doc=3230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.2869867 = fieldWeight in 3230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3230)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Spezialbibliotheken zwischen Auftrag und Ressourcen: 6.-9. September 2005 in München, 30. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e.V. / Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband. Red.: M. Brauer

0.00822128 = product of:
  0.024663838 = sum of:
    0.024663838 = product of:
      0.049327675 = sum of:
        0.049327675 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049327675 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103

0.00822128 = product of:
  0.024663838 = sum of:
    0.024663838 = product of:
      0.049327675 = sum of:
        0.049327675 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049327675 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 2.2009 18:50:43

0.007193619 = product of:
  0.021580856 = sum of:
    0.021580856 = product of:
      0.043161713 = sum of:
        0.043161713 = weight(_text_:22 in 3656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043161713 = score(doc=3656,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3656, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3656)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Series

Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4

0.007193619 = product of:
  0.021580856 = sum of:
    0.021580856 = product of:
      0.043161713 = sum of:
        0.043161713 = weight(_text_:22 in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043161713 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.143-170

0.00628247 = product of:
  0.01884741 = sum of:
    0.01884741 = product of:
      0.03769482 = sum of:
        0.03769482 = weight(_text_:2005 in 761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03769482 = score(doc=761,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.19132447 = fieldWeight in 761, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=761)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Der KOBV setzt bereits seit 2005 Suchmaschinentechnologie in verschiedenen Entwicklungsprojekten erfolgreich ein. Zusammen mit der Bibliothek des Wissenschaftsparks Albert Einstein wurde nun der Prototyp einer "Bibliothekssuchmaschine" auf Basis erprobter Open-Source-Technologien aus dem Java-Umfeld (wie Tomcat, Jakarta-Commons, Log4J usw.) als web-basierte Anwendung realisiert, deren Suchmaschinenkern auf der ebenfalls als freie Open-Source Java-Variante erhältlichen Search-Engine-Library Lucene4 basiert. Die erste Version der Bibliothekssuchmaschine läuft seit Ende Oktober im Echtbetrieb. Ziel des Pilotprojektes war die Konzeptionierung, Spezifikation und Implementierung einer neuen, benutzerfreundlichen Suchoberfläche zum schnellen Auffinden fachwissenschaftlich relevanter Daten und Informationen, sowohl in bibliothekseigenen Beständen als auch in zusätzlichen Quellen. Vor dem spezifischen Hintergrund der Spezialbibliothek werden dabei nicht nur Kataloginhalte google-like findbar gemacht, sondern der Suchraum "Katalog" um weitere für die Informationsvermittlung auf dem Campus relevante und spezifische fachwissenschaftliche Inhalte als zusätzliche Suchräume erschlossen. Die neue Anwendung dient dem schnellen Ersteinstieg und leitet die Nutzer dann an die jeweiligen Quellen weiter.

0.005497161 = product of:
  0.016491482 = sum of:
    0.016491482 = product of:
      0.032982964 = sum of:
        0.032982964 = weight(_text_:2005 in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032982964 = score(doc=1172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.16740891 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The impetus for this essay is the library community's uncertainty regarding the present and future direction of the library catalog in the era of Google and mass digitization projects. The uncertainty is evident at the highest levels. Deanna Marcum, Associate Librarian for Library Services at the Library of Congress (LC), is struck by undergraduate students who favor digital resources over the online library catalog because such resources are available at anytime and from anywhere (Marcum, 2006). She suggests that "the detailed attention that we have been paying to descriptive cataloging may no longer be justified ... retooled catalogers could give more time to authority control, subject analysis, [and] resource identification and evaluation" (Marcum, 2006, 8). In an abrupt about-face, LC terminated series added entries in cataloging records, one of the few subject-rich fields in such records (Cataloging Policy and Support Office, 2006). Mann (2006b) and Schniderman (2006) cite evidence of LC's prevailing viewpoint in favor of simplifying cataloging at the expense of subject cataloging. LC commissioned Karen Calhoun (2006) to prepare a report on "revitalizing" the online library catalog. Calhoun's directive is clear: divert resources from cataloging mass-produced formats (e.g., books) to cataloging the unique primary sources (e.g., archives, special collections, teaching objects, research by-products). She sums up her rationale for such a directive, "The existing local catalog's market position has eroded to the point where there is real concern for its ability to weather the competition for information seekers' attention" (p. 10). At the University of California Libraries (2005), a task force's recommendations parallel those in Calhoun report especially regarding the elimination of subject headings in favor of automatically generated metadata. Contemplating these events prompted me to revisit the glorious past of the online library catalog. For a decade and a half beginning in the early 1980s, the online library catalog was the jewel in the crown when people eagerly queued at its terminals to find information written by the world's experts. I despair how eagerly people now embrace Google because of the suspect provenance of the information Google retrieves. Long ago, we could have added more value to the online library catalog but the only thing we changed was the catalog's medium. Our failure to act back then cost the online catalog the crown. Now that the era of mass digitization has begun, we have a second chance at redesigning the online library catalog, getting it right, coaxing back old users, and attracting new ones. Let's revisit the past, reconsidering missed opportunities, reassessing their merits, combining them with new directions, making bold decisions and acting decisively on them.

0.00411064 = product of:
  0.012331919 = sum of:
    0.012331919 = product of:
      0.024663838 = sum of:
        0.024663838 = weight(_text_:22 in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024663838 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 2.2009 19:40:38