Search (30 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.01
    0.012331918 = product of:
      0.036995754 = sum of:
        0.036995754 = product of:
          0.07399151 = sum of:
            0.07399151 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07399151 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  2. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.01
    0.012331918 = product of:
      0.036995754 = sum of:
        0.036995754 = product of:
          0.07399151 = sum of:
            0.07399151 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07399151 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  3. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.01
    0.012331918 = product of:
      0.036995754 = sum of:
        0.036995754 = product of:
          0.07399151 = sum of:
            0.07399151 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07399151 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
  4. Szostak, R.: Classification, interdisciplinarity, and the study of science (2008) 0.01
    0.011105943 = product of:
      0.033317827 = sum of:
        0.033317827 = product of:
          0.06663565 = sum of:
            0.06663565 = weight(_text_:2005 in 1893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06663565 = score(doc=1893,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.33821708 = fieldWeight in 1893, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1893)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to respond to the 2005 paper by Hjørland and Nissen Pedersen by suggesting that an exhaustive and universal classification of the phenomena that scholars study, and the methods and theories they apply, is feasible. It seeks to argue that such a classification is critical for interdisciplinary scholarship. Design/methodology/approach - The paper presents a literature-based conceptual analysis, taking Hjørland and Nissen Pedersen as its starting point. Hjørland and Nissen Pedersen had identified several difficulties that would be encountered in developing such a classification; the paper suggests how each of these can be overcome. It also urges a deductive approach as complementary to the inductive approach recommended by Hjørland and Nissen Pedersen. Findings - The paper finds that an exhaustive and universal classification of scholarly documents in terms of (at least) the phenomena that scholars study, and the theories and methods they apply, appears to be both possible and desirable. Practical implications - The paper suggests how such a project can be begun. In particular it stresses the importance of classifying documents in terms of causal links between phenomena. Originality/value - The paper links the information science, interdisciplinary, and study of science literatures, and suggests that the types of classification outlined above would be of great value to scientists/scholars, and that they are possible.
    Content
    Bezugnahme auf: Hjoerland, B., K.N. Pedersen: A substantive theory of classification for information retrieval. In: Journal of documentation. 61(2005) no.5, S.582-597. - Vgl. auch: Hjoerland, R.: Core classification theory: : a reply to Szostak. In: Journal of documentation. 64(2008) no.3, S.333 - 342.
  5. Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996) 0.01
    0.00822128 = product of:
      0.024663838 = sum of:
        0.024663838 = product of:
          0.049327675 = sum of:
            0.049327675 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049327675 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 4.1997 21:10:19
  6. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.01
    0.00822128 = product of:
      0.024663838 = sum of:
        0.024663838 = product of:
          0.049327675 = sum of:
            0.049327675 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049327675 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  7. Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006) 0.01
    0.00822128 = product of:
      0.024663838 = sum of:
        0.024663838 = product of:
          0.049327675 = sum of:
            0.049327675 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049327675 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2007 22:19:35
  8. Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018) 0.01
    0.00822128 = product of:
      0.024663838 = sum of:
        0.024663838 = product of:
          0.049327675 = sum of:
            0.049327675 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049327675 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.1-22
  9. Frické, M.: Logical division (2016) 0.01
    0.007853087 = product of:
      0.023559261 = sum of:
        0.023559261 = product of:
          0.047118522 = sum of:
            0.047118522 = weight(_text_:2005 in 3183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047118522 = score(doc=3183,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.23915559 = fieldWeight in 3183, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3183)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Division is obviously important to Knowledge Organization. Typically, an organizational infrastructure might acknowledge three types of connecting relationships: class hierarchies, where some classes are subclasses of others, partitive hierarchies, where some items are parts of others, and instantiation, where some items are members of some classes (see Z39.19 ANSI/NISO 2005 as an example). The first two of these involve division (the third, instantiation, does not involve division). Logical division would usually be a part of hierarchical classification systems, which, in turn, are central to shelving in libraries, to subject classification schemes, to controlled vocabularies, and to thesauri. Partitive hierarchies, and partitive division, are often essential to controlled vocabularies, thesauri, and subject tagging systems. Partitive hierarchies also relate to the bearers of information; for example, a journal would typically have its component articles as parts and, in turn, they might have sections as their parts, and, of course, components might be arrived at by partitive division (see Tillett 2009 as an illustration). Finally, verbal division, disambiguating homographs, is basic to controlled vocabularies. Thus Division is a broad and relevant topic. This article, though, is going to focus on Logical Division.
  10. Quinlan, E.; Rafferty, P.: Astronomy classification : towards a faceted classification scheme (2019) 0.01
    0.007853087 = product of:
      0.023559261 = sum of:
        0.023559261 = product of:
          0.047118522 = sum of:
            0.047118522 = weight(_text_:2005 in 5313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047118522 = score(doc=5313,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.23915559 = fieldWeight in 5313, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5313)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Astronomy classification is often overlooked in classification discourse. Its rarity and obscurity, especially within UK librarianship, suggests it is an underdeveloped strand of classification research and is possibly undervalued in modern librarianship. The purpose of this research is to investigate the suitability and practicalities of the discipline of astronomy adopting a subject-specific faceted classification scheme and to provide a provi-sional outline of a special faceted astronomy classification scheme. The research demonstrates that the application of universal schemes for astronomy classification had left the interdisciplinary subject ill catered for and outdated, making accurate classification difficult for specialist astronomy collections. A faceted approach to classification development is supported by two qualitative literature-based research methods: historical research into astronomy classification and an analytico-synthetic classification case study. The subsequent classification development is influenced through a pragmatic and scholarly-scientific approach and constructed by means of instruction from faceted classification guides by Vickery (1960) and Batley (2005), and faceted classification principles from Ranaganathan (1937). This research fills a gap within classification discourse on specialist interdisciplinary subjects, specifically within astronomy and demonstrates the best means for their classification. It provides a means of assessing further the value of faceted classification within astronomy librarianship.
  11. Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996) 0.01
    0.007193619 = product of:
      0.021580856 = sum of:
        0.021580856 = product of:
          0.043161713 = sum of:
            0.043161713 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043161713 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
  12. Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001) 0.01
    0.007193619 = product of:
      0.021580856 = sum of:
        0.021580856 = product of:
          0.043161713 = sum of:
            0.043161713 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043161713 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.01
    0.007193619 = product of:
      0.021580856 = sum of:
        0.021580856 = product of:
          0.043161713 = sum of:
            0.043161713 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043161713 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.22-36
  14. Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999) 0.01
    0.006165959 = product of:
      0.018497877 = sum of:
        0.018497877 = product of:
          0.036995754 = sum of:
            0.036995754 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036995754 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
  15. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.01
    0.006165959 = product of:
      0.018497877 = sum of:
        0.018497877 = product of:
          0.036995754 = sum of:
            0.036995754 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036995754 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31
  16. Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010) 0.01
    0.006165959 = product of:
      0.018497877 = sum of:
        0.018497877 = product of:
          0.036995754 = sum of:
            0.036995754 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036995754 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)
  17. Howarth, L.C.; Jansen, E.H.: Towards a typology of warrant for 21st century knowledge organization systems (2014) 0.01
    0.006165959 = product of:
      0.018497877 = sum of:
        0.018497877 = product of:
          0.036995754 = sum of:
            0.036995754 = weight(_text_:22 in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036995754 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  18. Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014) 0.01
    0.006165959 = product of:
      0.018497877 = sum of:
        0.018497877 = product of:
          0.036995754 = sum of:
            0.036995754 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036995754 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  19. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018) 0.01
    0.006165959 = product of:
      0.018497877 = sum of:
        0.018497877 = product of:
          0.036995754 = sum of:
            0.036995754 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036995754 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    17. 2.2018 18:22:25
  20. Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995) 0.01
    0.0051382994 = product of:
      0.015414898 = sum of:
        0.015414898 = product of:
          0.030829797 = sum of:
            0.030829797 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030829797 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04550987 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22