Search (41 results, page 1 of 3)

0.047514066 = product of:
  0.0712711 = sum of:
    0.04818783 = product of:
      0.14456348 = sum of:
        0.14456348 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14456348 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3858332 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.023083268 = product of:
      0.046166535 = sum of:
        0.046166535 = weight(_text_:2005 in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046166535 = score(doc=701,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.23432367 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.

Year

2005

0.035260275 = product of:
  0.10578082 = sum of:
    0.10578082 = product of:
      0.21156164 = sum of:
        0.21156164 = weight(_text_:2005 in 3295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21156164 = score(doc=3295,freq=7.0), product of:
            0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            1.0738059 = fieldWeight in 3295, product of:
              2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
                7.0 = termFreq=7.0
              4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3295)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Ein Schwerpunkt der Online Information 2004 bildete das Thema "Search": Wie wird die Suche in 2005 aussehen? Welche Bedeutung haben Taxonomien? Wie verändern sich Suchfunktionen?

Source

Password. 2005, H.1, S.23

Year

2005

0.029045809 = product of:
  0.08713742 = sum of:
    0.08713742 = product of:
      0.17427485 = sum of:
        0.17427485 = weight(_text_:2005 in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17427485 = score(doc=439,freq=19.0), product of:
            0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.8845525 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
              4.358899 = tf(freq=19.0), with freq of:
                19.0 = termFreq=19.0
              4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the Second European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2005, heldin Heraklion, Crete, Greece in May/June 2005. The 48 revised full papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 148 submissions. The papers are organized in topical sections on semantic Web services, languages, ontologies, reasoning and querying, search and information retrieval, user and communities, natural language for the semantic Web, annotation tools, and semantic Web applications.

RSWK

Semantic Web / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>

Subject

Semantic Web / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>

Year

2005

0.024191584 = product of:
  0.07257475 = sum of:
    0.07257475 = sum of:
      0.03769482 = weight(_text_:2005 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03769482 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04550987 = queryNorm
          0.19132447 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.034879934 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034879934 = score(doc=2654,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04550987 = queryNorm
          0.21886435 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

In order to transfer the Chinese Classified Thesaurus (CCT) into a machine-processable format and provide CCT-based Web services, a pilot study has been conducted in which a variety of selected CCT classes and mapped thesaurus entries are encoded with SKOS. OWL and RDFS are also used to encode the same contents for the purposes of feasibility and cost-benefit comparison. CCT is a collected effort led by the National Library of China. It is an integration of the national standards Chinese Library Classification (CLC) 4th edition and Chinese Thesaurus (CT). As a manually created mapping product, CCT provides for each of the classes the corresponding thesaurus terms, and vice versa. The coverage of CCT includes four major clusters: philosophy, social sciences and humanities, natural sciences and technologies, and general works. There are 22 main-classes, 52,992 sub-classes and divisions, 110,837 preferred thesaurus terms, 35,690 entry terms (non-preferred terms), and 59,738 pre-coordinated headings (Chinese Classified Thesaurus, 2005) Major challenges of encoding this large vocabulary comes from its integrated structure. CCT is a result of the combination of two structures (illustrated in Figure 1): a thesaurus that uses ISO-2788 standardized structure and a classification scheme that is basically enumerative, but provides some flexibility for several kinds of synthetic mechanisms Other challenges include the complex relationships caused by differences of granularities of two original schemes and their presentation with various levels of SKOS elements; as well as the diverse coordination of entries due to the use of auxiliary tables and pre-coordinated headings derived from combining classes, subdivisions, and thesaurus terms, which do not correspond to existing unique identifiers. The poster reports the progress, shares the sample SKOS entries, and summarizes problems identified during the SKOS encoding process. Although OWL Lite and OWL Full provide richer expressiveness, the cost-benefit issues and the final purposes of encoding CCT raise questions of using such approaches.

Source

Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

0.023591576 = product of:
  0.07077473 = sum of:
    0.07077473 = sum of:
      0.04407534 = weight(_text_:2005 in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04407534 = score(doc=150,freq=7.0), product of:
          0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04550987 = queryNorm
          0.22370957 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
            2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
              7.0 = termFreq=7.0
            4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
      0.026699388 = weight(_text_:22 in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.026699388 = score(doc=150,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04550987 = queryNorm
          0.16753313 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Classification

006.7 22
QA76.575.M7915 2005

Date

7. 3.2007 19:30:22

DDC

006.7 22

LCC

QA76.575.M7915 2005

Year

2005

0.020786218 = product of:
  0.062358655 = sum of:
    0.062358655 = sum of:
      0.03769482 = weight(_text_:2005 in 2656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03769482 = score(doc=2656,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04550987 = queryNorm
          0.19132447 = fieldWeight in 2656, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2656)
      0.024663838 = weight(_text_:22 in 2656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024663838 = score(doc=2656,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04550987 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2656, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2656)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This poster explores the customization of DSpace to allow the use of the AGRIS Application Profile metadata standard and the AGROVOC thesaurus. The objective is the adaptation of DSpace, through the least invasive code changes either in the form of plug-ins or add-ons, to the specific needs of the Agricultural Sciences and Technology community. Metadata standards such as AGRIS AP, and Knowledge Organization Systems such as the AGROVOC thesaurus, provide mechanisms for sharing information in a standardized manner by recommending the use of common semantics and interoperable syntax (Subirats et al., 2007). AGRIS AP was created to enhance the description, exchange and subsequent retrieval of agricultural Document-like Information Objects (DLIOs). It is a metadata schema which draws from Metadata standards such as Dublin Core (DC), the Australian Government Locator Service Metadata (AGLS) and the Agricultural Metadata Element Set (AgMES) namespaces. It allows sharing of information across dispersed bibliographic systems (FAO, 2005). AGROVOC68 is a multilingual structured thesaurus covering agricultural and related domains. Its main role is to standardize the indexing process in order to make searching simpler and more efficient. AGROVOC is developed by FAO (Lauser et al., 2006). The customization of the DSpace is taking place in several phases. First, the AGRIS AP metadata schema was mapped onto the metadata DSpace model, with several enhancements implemented to support AGRIS AP elements. Next, AGROVOC will be integrated as a controlled vocabulary accessed through a local SKOS or OWL file. Eventually the system will be configurable to access AGROVOC through local files or remotely via webservices. Finally, spell checking and tooltips will be incorporated in the user interface to support metadata editing. Adapting DSpace to support AGRIS AP and annotation using the semantically-rich AGROVOC thesaurus transform DSpace into a powerful, domain-specific system for annotation and exchange of bibliographic metadata in the agricultural domain.

Source

Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

0.020786218 = product of:
  0.062358655 = sum of:
    0.062358655 = sum of:
      0.03769482 = weight(_text_:2005 in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03769482 = score(doc=2661,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04550987 = queryNorm
          0.19132447 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
      0.024663838 = weight(_text_:22 in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024663838 = score(doc=2661,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04550987 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The basic goal of education within a discipline is to transform a novice into an expert. This entails moving the novice toward the "semantic space" that the expert inhabits-the space of concepts, meanings, vocabularies, and other intellectual constructs that comprise the discipline. Metadata is significant to this goal in digitally mediated education environments. Encoding the experts' semantic space not only enables the sharing of semantics among discipline scientists, but also creates an environment that bridges the semantic gap between the common vocabulary of the novice and the granular descriptive language of the seasoned scientist (Greenberg, et al, 2005). Developments underlying the Semantic Web, where vocabularies are formalized in the Web Ontology Language (OWL), and Web 2.0 approaches of user-generated folksonomies provide an infrastructure for linking vocabulary systems and promoting group learning via metadata literacy. Group learning is a pedagogical approach to teaching that harnesses the phenomenon of "collective intelligence" to increase learning by means of collaboration. Learning a new semantic system can be daunting for a novice, and yet it is integral to advance one's knowledge in a discipline and retain interest. These ideas are key to the "BOT 2.0: Botany through Web 2.0, the Memex and Social Learning" project (Bot 2.0).72 Bot 2.0 is a collaboration involving the North Carolina Botanical Garden, the UNC SILS Metadata Research center, and the Renaissance Computing Institute (RENCI). Bot 2.0 presents a curriculum utilizing a memex as a way for students to link and share digital information, working asynchronously in an environment beyond the traditional classroom. Our conception of a memex is not a centralized black box but rather a flexible, distributed framework that uses the most salient and easiest-to-use collaborative platforms (e.g., Facebook, Flickr, wiki and blog technology) for personal information management. By meeting students "where they live" digitally, we hope to attract students to the study of botanical science. A key aspect is to teach students scientific terminology and about the value of metadata, an inherent function in several of the technologies and in the instructional approach we are utilizing. This poster will report on a study examining the value of both folksonomies and taxonomies for post-secondary college students learning plant identification. Our data is drawn from a curriculum involving a virtual independent learning portion and a "BotCamp" weekend at UNC, where students work with digital plan specimens that they have captured. Results provide some insight into the importance of collaboration and shared vocabulary for gaining confidence and for student progression from novice to expert in botany.

Source

Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

0.016244242 = product of:
  0.048732724 = sum of:
    0.048732724 = sum of:
      0.033317827 = weight(_text_:2005 in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033317827 = score(doc=1847,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04550987 = queryNorm
          0.16910854 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
      0.015414898 = weight(_text_:22 in 1847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.015414898 = score(doc=1847,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04550987 = queryNorm
          0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 1847, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1847)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

LibraryThing ist eine zur Klasse der Sozialen Software gehörende Webanwendung, in der Benutzer gemeinsam Bücher verwalten und miteinander in Kontakt treten können. Die Webseite wurde Ende August 2005 veröffentlicht und verzeichnet inzwischen (Juli 2007) über 235.000 Benutzer und 16 Millionen verschiedene Bücher. Jeder Nutzer verfügt über eine eigene Sammlung, die in LibraryThing als "Bibliotheken" oder "Katalog" bezeichnet wird. Die Katalogisierung geschieht in eine gemeinsame Datenbank, die von allen Nutzern direkt bearbeitet werden kann. Da es sich um eine reine Webanwendung handelt, muss zur Nutzung keine weitere Software installiert werden. Die Nutzung ist für bis zu 200 Medien kostenlos, eine jährliche Mitgliedschaft kostet 10 $ und eine lebenslange Mitgliedschaft 25 $. Bibliotheken und andere nichtkommerzielle Einrichtungen zahlen 15 $ pro Jahr. Dieses Preismodell hat sich auch nicht geändert, nachdem 40% des Unternehmens im Mai 2006 vom Gebrauchtbuchhändler AbeBooks übernommen wurden. Die Mehrheit hält weiterhin der Gründer Tim Spalding, der die ursprünglich als privates Projekt begonnene Seite mit inzwischen zwei weiteren Entwicklern und einer Bibliothekarin kontinuierlich weiterentwickelt.

Content

Zusammenarbeit mit Bibliotheken Bereits früh setzte sich Tim Spalding für eine Zusammenarbeit mit Bibliotheken ein. Zum Eintragen von neuen Büchern in LibraryThing können zahlreiche Bibliothekskataloge ausgewählt werden, die via Z39.50 eingebunden werden - seit Oktober 2006 ist auch der GBV dabei. Im April 2007 veröffentlichte Tim Spalding mit LibraryThing for Libraries ein Reihe von Webservices, die Bibliotheken in ihre OPACs einbinden können.4 Ein Webservice ist eine Funktion, die von anderen Programmen über das Web aufgerufen werden kann und Daten zurückliefert. Bereits seit Juni 2006 können über verschiedene offene LibraryThing-Webservices unter Anderem zu einer gegebenen ISBN die Sprache und eine Liste von ISBNs anderer Auflagen und Übersetzungen ermittelt werden, die zum gleichen Werk gehören (thinglSBN). Damit setzt LibraryThing praktisch einen Teil der Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) um, die in bibliothekswissenschaftlichen Fachkreisen bereits seit Anfang der 1990er diskutiert werden, aber bislang nicht so Recht ihre Umsetzung in Katalogen gefunden haben. Die Information darüber, welche Bücher zum gleichen Werk gehören, wird von der LibraryThing-Community bereitgestellt; jeder Benutzer kann einzelne Ausgaben mit einem Klick zusammenführen oder wieder trennen. Vergleiche mit dem ähnlichen Dienst xISBN von OCLC zeigen, dass sich thinglSBN und xISBN gut ergänzen, allerdings bietet LibraryThing seinen Webservice im Gegensatz zu OCLC kostenlos an. Neben Empfehlungen von verwandten Büchern ist es im Rahmen von LibraryThing for Libraries auch möglich, die von den Nutzern vergebenen Tags in den eigenen Katalog einzubinden. Ein Nachteil dabei ist allerdings die bisherige Übermacht der englischen Sprache und dass nur selbständige Titel mit ISBN berücksichtigt werden. Die VZG prüft derzeit, in welcher Form LibraryThing for Libraries am besten in GBV-Bibliotheken umgesetzt werden kann. Es spricht allerdings für jede einzelne Bibliothek nichts dagegen, schon jetzt damit zu experimentieren, wie der eigene OPAC mit zusätzlichen Links und Tags von LibraryThing aussehen könnte. Darüber hinaus können sich auch Bibliotheken mit einem eigenen Zugang als Nutzer in LibraryThing beteiligen. So stellt beispielsweise die Stadtbücherei Nordenham bereits seit Ende 2005 ihre Neuzugänge im Erwachsenenbestand in einer Sammlung bei LibraryThing ein.

Date

22. 9.2007 10:36:23

0.01469178 = product of:
  0.04407534 = sum of:
    0.04407534 = product of:
      0.08815068 = sum of:
        0.08815068 = weight(_text_:2005 in 2789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08815068 = score(doc=2789,freq=7.0), product of:
            0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.44741914 = fieldWeight in 2789, product of:
              2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
                7.0 = termFreq=7.0
              4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2789)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Classification

TK5105.88815.S84 2005

LCC

TK5105.88815.S84 2005

Year

2005

0.014387238 = product of:
  0.043161713 = sum of:
    0.043161713 = product of:
      0.086323425 = sum of:
        0.086323425 = weight(_text_:22 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086323425 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 9.2007 15:41:14

0.01346524 = product of:
  0.040395718 = sum of:
    0.040395718 = product of:
      0.080791436 = sum of:
        0.080791436 = weight(_text_:2005 in 4764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.080791436 = score(doc=4764,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.41006643 = fieldWeight in 4764, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4764)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Year

2005

0.012331918 = product of:
  0.036995754 = sum of:
    0.036995754 = product of:
      0.07399151 = sum of:
        0.07399151 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07399151 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 9.2007 15:41:14

0.012331918 = product of:
  0.036995754 = sum of:
    0.036995754 = product of:
      0.07399151 = sum of:
        0.07399151 = weight(_text_:22 in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07399151 = score(doc=100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 9.2007 15:41:14

0.010276599 = product of:
  0.030829797 = sum of:
    0.030829797 = product of:
      0.061659593 = sum of:
        0.061659593 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061659593 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou

0.008691776 = product of:
  0.026075326 = sum of:
    0.026075326 = product of:
      0.05215065 = sum of:
        0.05215065 = weight(_text_:2005 in 517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05215065 = score(doc=517,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.26469675 = fieldWeight in 517, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=517)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

XTech 2005: XML, the Web and beyond.

Year

2005

0.00822128 = product of:
  0.024663838 = sum of:
    0.024663838 = product of:
      0.049327675 = sum of:
        0.049327675 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049327675 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

31. 7.2010 16:58:22

0.00822128 = product of:
  0.024663838 = sum of:
    0.024663838 = product of:
      0.049327675 = sum of:
        0.049327675 = weight(_text_:22 in 4331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049327675 = score(doc=4331,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4331, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4331)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

15. 3.2011 19:21:22

0.00822128 = product of:
  0.024663838 = sum of:
    0.024663838 = product of:
      0.049327675 = sum of:
        0.049327675 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049327675 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

14. 8.2011 13:33:22

0.007853087 = product of:
  0.023559261 = sum of:
    0.023559261 = product of:
      0.047118522 = sum of:
        0.047118522 = weight(_text_:2005 in 6061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047118522 = score(doc=6061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19702037 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.23915559 = fieldWeight in 6061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.329179 = idf(docFreq=1583, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6061)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The middle of the 1990s are coined by the increased enthusiasm for the possibilities of the WWW, which has only recently deviated - at least in relation to scientific information - for the differentiated measuring of its advantages and disadvantages. Web Information Retrieval originated as a specialized discipline with great commercial significance (for an overview see Lewandowski 2005). Besides the new technological structure that enables the indexing and searching (in seconds) of unimaginable amounts of data worldwide, new assessment processes for the ranking of search results are being developed, which use the link structures of the Web. They are the main innovation with respect to the traditional "mother discipline" of Information Retrieval. From the beginning, link structures of Web pages are applied to commercial search engines in a wide array of variations. From the perspective of scientific information, link topology based approaches were in essence trying to solve a self-created problem: on the one hand, it quickly became clear that the openness of the Web led to an up-tonow unknown increase in available information, but this also caused the quality of the Web pages searched to become a problem - and with it the relevance of the results. The gatekeeper function of traditional information providers, which narrows down every user query to focus on high-quality sources was lacking. Therefore, the recognition of the "authoritativeness" of the Web pages by general search engines such as Google was one of the most important factors for their success.

0.007193619 = product of:
  0.021580856 = sum of:
    0.021580856 = product of:
      0.043161713 = sum of:
        0.043161713 = weight(_text_:22 in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043161713 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15936781 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550987 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003