Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Gnoli, C."
  1. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : Part 2: Types and levels (2017) 0.02
    0.015961248 = product of:
      0.04788374 = sum of:
        0.04788374 = product of:
          0.09576748 = sum of:
            0.09576748 = weight(_text_:form in 3177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09576748 = score(doc=3177,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.20323196 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.104017 = idf(docFreq=1983, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049520254 = queryNorm
                0.47122255 = fieldWeight in 3177, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.104017 = idf(docFreq=1983, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3177)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    After making the case that phenomena can be the primary unit of classification (Part 1), some basic principles to group and sort phenomena are considered. Entities can be grouped together on the basis of both their similarity (morphology) and their common origin (phylogeny). The resulting groups will form the classical hierarchical chains of types and subtypes. At every hierarchical degree, phenomena can form ordered sets (arrays), where their sorting can reflect levels of increasing organization, corresponding to an evolutionary order of appearance (emergence). The theory of levels of reality has been investigated by many philosophers and applied to knowledge organization systems by various authors, which are briefly reviewed. At the broadest degree, it allows to identify some major strata of phenomena (forms, matter, life, minds, societies and culture) in turn divided into layers. A list of twenty-six layers is proposed to form the main classes of the Integrative Levels Classification system. A combination of morphology and phylogeny can determine whether a given phenomenon should be a type of an existing level, or a level on its own.
  2. Gnoli, C.: Metadata about what? : distinguishing between ontic, epistemic, and documental dimensions in knowledge organization (2012) 0.01
    0.01330104 = product of:
      0.03990312 = sum of:
        0.03990312 = product of:
          0.07980624 = sum of:
            0.07980624 = weight(_text_:form in 323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07980624 = score(doc=323,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.20323196 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.104017 = idf(docFreq=1983, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049520254 = queryNorm
                0.39268547 = fieldWeight in 323, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.104017 = idf(docFreq=1983, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=323)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The spread of many new media and formats is changing the scenario faced by knowledge organizers: as printed monographs are not the only standard form of knowledge carrier anymore, the traditional kind of knowledge organization (KO) systems based on academic disciplines is put into question. A sounder foundation can be provided by an analysis of the different dimensions concurring to form the content of any knowledge item-what Brian Vickery described as the steps "from the world to the classifier." The ultimate referents of documents are the phenomena of the real world, that can be ordered by ontology, the study of what exists. Phenomena coexist in subjects with the perspectives by which they are considered, pertaining to epistemology, and with the formal features of knowledge carriers, adding a further, pragmatic layer. All these dimensions can be accounted for in metadata, but are often done so in mixed ways, making indexes less rigorous and interoperable. For example, while facet analysis was originally developed for subject indexing, many "faceted" interfaces today mix subject facets with form facets, and schemes presented as "ontologies" for the "semantic Web" also code for non-semantic information. In bibliographic classifications, phenomena are often confused with the disciplines dealing with them, the latter being assumed to be the most useful starting point, for users will have either one or another perspective. A general citation order of dimensions- phenomena, perspective, carrier-is recommended, helping to concentrate most relevant information at the beginning of headings.
  3. Gnoli, C.: Categories and facets in integrative levels (2008) 0.01
    0.00921523 = product of:
      0.02764569 = sum of:
        0.02764569 = product of:
          0.05529138 = sum of:
            0.05529138 = weight(_text_:form in 1806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05529138 = score(doc=1806,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20323196 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.104017 = idf(docFreq=1983, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049520254 = queryNorm
                0.27206045 = fieldWeight in 1806, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.104017 = idf(docFreq=1983, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1806)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Facets and general categories used in bibliographic classification have been based on a disciplinary organization of knowledge. However, facets and categories of phenomena independent from disciplines can be identified similarly. Phenomena can be classified according to a series of integrative levels (layers), which in turn can be grouped into the major strata of form, matter, life, mind, society and culture, agreeing with Nicolai Hartmann's ontology. Unlike a layer, a stratum is not constituted of elements of the lower ones; rather, it represents the formal pattern of the lower ones, like the horse hoof represents the shape of the steppe. Bibliographic categories can now be seen in the light of level theory: some categories are truly general, while others only appear at a given level, being the realization of a general category in the specific context of the level: these are the facets of that level. In the notation of the Integrative Level Classification project, categories and facets are represented by digits, and displayed in a Web interface with the help of colours.
  4. Almeida, P. de; Gnoli, C.: Fiction in a phenomenon-based classification (2021) 0.01
    0.00921523 = product of:
      0.02764569 = sum of:
        0.02764569 = product of:
          0.05529138 = sum of:
            0.05529138 = weight(_text_:form in 712) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05529138 = score(doc=712,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20323196 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.104017 = idf(docFreq=1983, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049520254 = queryNorm
                0.27206045 = fieldWeight in 712, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.104017 = idf(docFreq=1983, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=712)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In traditional classification, fictional works are indexed only by their form, genre, and language, while their subject content is believed to be irrelevant. However, recent research suggests that this may not be the best approach. We tested indexing of a small sample of selected fictional works by Integrative Levels Classification (ILC2), a freely faceted system based on phenomena instead of disciplines and considered the structure of the resulting classmarks. Issues in the process of subject analysis, such as selection of relevant vs. non-relevant themes and citation order of relevant ones, are identified and discussed. Some phenomena that are covered in scholarly literature can also be identified as relevant themes in fictional literature and expressed in classmarks. This can allow for hybrid search and retrieval systems covering both fiction and nonfiction, which will result in better leveraging of the knowledge contained in fictional works.
  5. Gnoli, C.: Boundaries and overlaps of disciplines in Bloch's methodology of historical knowledge (2014) 0.01
    0.0067093107 = product of:
      0.020127932 = sum of:
        0.020127932 = product of:
          0.040255863 = sum of:
            0.040255863 = weight(_text_:22 in 1414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040255863 = score(doc=1414,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17341149 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049520254 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1414, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1414)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  6. Lardera, M.; Gnoli, C.; Rolandi, C.; Trzmielewski, M.: Developing SciGator, a DDC-based library browsing tool (2017) 0.01
    0.0067093107 = product of:
      0.020127932 = sum of:
        0.020127932 = product of:
          0.040255863 = sum of:
            0.040255863 = weight(_text_:22 in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040255863 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17341149 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049520254 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Beitrag eines Special Issue: ISKO-Italy: 8' Incontro ISKO Italia, Università di Bologna, 22 maggio 2017, Bologna, Italia.
  7. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018) 0.01
    0.0067093107 = product of:
      0.020127932 = sum of:
        0.020127932 = product of:
          0.040255863 = sum of:
            0.040255863 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040255863 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17341149 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049520254 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    17. 2.2018 18:22:25
  8. Gnoli, C.: Classification transcends library business : the case of BiblioPhil (2010) 0.01
    0.005591092 = product of:
      0.016773276 = sum of:
        0.016773276 = product of:
          0.033546552 = sum of:
            0.033546552 = weight(_text_:22 in 3698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033546552 = score(doc=3698,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17341149 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049520254 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3698, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3698)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2010 20:40:08
  9. Gnoli, C.; Merli, G.; Pavan, G.; Bernuzzi, E.; Priano, M.: Freely faceted classification for a Web-based bibliographic archive : the BioAcoustic Reference Database (2010) 0.01
    0.005591092 = product of:
      0.016773276 = sum of:
        0.016773276 = product of:
          0.033546552 = sum of:
            0.033546552 = weight(_text_:22 in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033546552 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17341149 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049520254 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly