Search (5744 results, page 1 of 288)

  1. Dobreski, B.; Snow, K.; Moulaison-Sandy, H.: On overlap and otherness : a comparison of three vocabularies' approaches to LGBTQ+ identity (2022) 0.17 
    0.17110929 = sum of:
  0.13827339 = product of:
    0.41482013 = sum of:
      0.41482013 = weight(_text_:lcsh's in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.41482013 = score(doc=1141,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.5414978 = queryWeight, product of:
            9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.7660606 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.03283591 = product of:
    0.06567182 = sum of:
      0.06567182 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06567182 = score(doc=1141,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Bibliographic records can include information from controlled vocabularies to capture identities about individuals, especially about authors or intended audiences; personal name authority records can also contain information about identity. Employing a systematic analysis of the overlap of the Homosaurus, Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), and Library of Congress Demographic Group Terms (LCDGT), this article explores the extent to which LGBTQ+ identities are represented in the three vocabularies. Despite LCSH's long, iterative history of development and the faceted, post-coordinate nature of LCDGT, neither vocabulary was found to be adequate in covering the complex, LGBTQ+ identities represented in the Homosaurus.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 60(2022) no.6-7, p.490-513
  2. Dean, R.J.: FAST: development of simplified headings for metadata (2004) 0.15 
    0.14666511 = sum of:
  0.118520044 = product of:
    0.35556012 = sum of:
      0.35556012 = weight(_text_:lcsh's in 5682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.35556012 = score(doc=5682,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.5414978 = queryWeight, product of:
            9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.65662336 = fieldWeight in 5682, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5682)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.028145066 = product of:
    0.05629013 = sum of:
      0.05629013 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05629013 = score(doc=5682,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 5682, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5682)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Subject Headings schema (LCSH) is the most commonly used and widely accepted subject vocabulary for general application. It is the de facto universal controlled vocabulary and has been a model for developing subject heading systems by many countries. However, LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control. Recent trends, driven to a large extent by the rapid growth of the Web, are forcing changes in bibliographic control systems to make them easier to use, understand, and apply, and subject headings are no exception. The purpose of adapting the LCSH with a simplified syntax to create FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) headings is to retain the very rich vocabulary of LCSH while making the schema easier to understand, control, apply, and use. The schema maintains compatibility with LCSH--any valid Library of Congress subject heading can be converted to FAST headings.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 39(2004) nos.1/2, S.xx-xx
  3. Nanfito, N.: ¬The indexed Web : engineering tools for cataloging, storing and delivering Web based documents (1999) 0.14 
    0.13899557 = product of:
  0.27799115 = sum of:
    0.27799115 = sum of:
      0.13134363 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 8727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13134363 = score(doc=8727,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.6096109 = fieldWeight in 8727, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8727)
      0.14664751 = weight(_text_:22 in 8727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14664751 = score(doc=8727,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 8727, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8727)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    5. 8.2001 12:22:47
    Source
    Information outlook. 3(1999) no.2, S.18-22
  4. Kim, K.-S.: Recent work in cataloging and classification, 2000-2002 (2003) 0.14 
    0.13576896 = product of:
  0.27153793 = sum of:
    0.27153793 = sum of:
      0.21228337 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21228337 = score(doc=152,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.98528004 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
      0.059254546 = weight(_text_:22 in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059254546 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article provides a review of cataloging and classification publications that appeared in the last two years. The review considers the papers in two categories. Cataloging Theories and Practices covers descriptive cataloging, authority control, classification, subject cataloging, cataloging nonbook materials, electronic resources and metadata, and international cooperation. The second section covers other issues related to cataloging, including management, and education and training. Throughout the review, the author identifies trends and important developments in the area of cataloging and classification.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Tell, B.V.: Cataloging rules and database production : implications for manpower training in a developing country (1989) 0.13 
    0.13430806 = product of:
  0.2686161 = sum of:
    0.2686161 = sum of:
      0.15010701 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15010701 = score(doc=435,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.6966982 = fieldWeight in 435, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=435)
      0.11850909 = weight(_text_:22 in 435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11850909 = score(doc=435,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 435, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=435)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.22-27
  6. McMann Kramer, M.; Hopkins, J.: ¬An interview with Judith Hopkins (2005) 0.13 
    0.13085097 = product of:
  0.26170194 = sum of:
    0.26170194 = sum of:
      0.18763377 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18763377 = score(doc=5105,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.87087274 = fieldWeight in 5105, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5105)
      0.07406818 = weight(_text_:22 in 5105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07406818 = score(doc=5105,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5105, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5105)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Judith Hopkins discusses her 47-year career in cataloging. Topics included are her cataloging education, her first job, her early participation in OCLC, her work documenting academic libraries' implementation of AACR2, AUTOCAT, and her views on the future of cataloging.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 41(2005) no.1, S.5-22
  7. Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American Cataloging Alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2003) 0.13 
    0.13085097 = product of:
  0.26170194 = sum of:
    0.26170194 = sum of:
      0.18763377 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18763377 = score(doc=4056,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.87087274 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
      0.07406818 = weight(_text_:22 in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07406818 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Also published as Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 35(2002/03)1/2 and 35(2002/03)3/4
    Pages
    S.3-22
    Source
    Historical aspects of cataloging and classification. Ed.: M.D. Joachim
  8. Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000) 0.12 
    0.118281886 = product of:
  0.23656377 = sum of:
    0.23656377 = sum of:
      0.1624956 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1624956 = score(doc=4608,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.7541979 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
      0.07406818 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07406818 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale": papers from the ALCTS preconference, June 26, 1998 "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale". ALCTS Preconference, Washington, D.C.
  9. Su, M.-F.: On cataloging and classifying chinese history (1983) 0.12 
    0.118281886 = product of:
  0.23656377 = sum of:
    0.23656377 = sum of:
      0.1624956 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1624956 = score(doc=322,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.7541979 = fieldWeight in 322, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=322)
      0.07406818 = weight(_text_:22 in 322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07406818 = score(doc=322,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 322, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=322)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article discusses the inadequate period divisions of Chinese history in LCSH and LCC. By studying cataloging and classification of Chinese history, the author also reveals the problems of expansion and revision of LCSH and LCC and of the lack of correspondence between LCSH and LCC.
    Date
    6. 1.2007 19:22:14
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 4(1983) no.2, S.51-71
  10. Houissa, A.: Arabic personal names : their components and rendering in catalog entries (1991) 0.12 
    0.11751954 = product of:
  0.23503909 = sum of:
    0.23503909 = sum of:
      0.13134363 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13134363 = score(doc=2857,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.6096109 = fieldWeight in 2857, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2857)
      0.10369545 = weight(_text_:22 in 2857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10369545 = score(doc=2857,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2857, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2857)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 13(1991) no.2, S.3-22
  11. Frank, S.: Cataloging digital geographic data in the information infrastructure (1997) 0.12 
    0.11751954 = product of:
  0.23503909 = sum of:
    0.23503909 = sum of:
      0.13134363 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13134363 = score(doc=3352,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.6096109 = fieldWeight in 3352, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3352)
      0.10369545 = weight(_text_:22 in 3352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10369545 = score(doc=3352,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3352, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3352)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
  12. Gatti, T.H.: Utilization of students as cataloging assistants at carnegie category I institution libraries (2005) 0.11 
    0.11353964 = product of:
  0.22707929 = sum of:
    0.22707929 = sum of:
      0.16782475 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16782475 = score(doc=43,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.7789323 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
      0.059254546 = weight(_text_:22 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059254546 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A survey of 261 libraries was undertaken to determine the level of use of and duties performed by student assistants in monographic cataloging operations. Ninety-five of 142 responding libraries (64.1 percent) indicate that they use student assistants for some type of monographic cataloging tasks. These tasks are downloading of bibliographic and authority records, monographic cataloging, classification, subject heading authority control, holdings, database maintenance, and editing of 246 or 505 MARC tags. Some respondents expressed reluctance to use student assistants for higher-level cataloging tasks.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.11 
    0.11353964 = product of:
  0.22707929 = sum of:
    0.22707929 = sum of:
      0.16782475 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16782475 = score(doc=249,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.7789323 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
      0.059254546 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059254546 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Weiss, A.K.; Carstens, T.V.: ¬The year's work in cataloging, 1999 (2001) 0.11 
    0.11279951 = product of:
  0.22559902 = sum of:
    0.22559902 = sum of:
      0.1737513 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 6084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1737513 = score(doc=6084,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.80643946 = fieldWeight in 6084, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6084)
      0.051847726 = weight(_text_:22 in 6084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051847726 = score(doc=6084,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6084, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6084)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The challenge of cataloging Web sites and electronic resources was the most important issue facing the cataloging world in the last year. This article reviews attempts to analyze and revise the cataloging code in view of the new electronic environment. The difficulties of applying traditional library cataloging standards to Web resources has led some to favor metadata as the best means of providing access to these materials. The appropriate education and training for library cataloging personnel remains crucial during this transitional period. Articles on user understanding of Library of Congress subject headings and on cataloging practice are also reviewed.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  15. Dillon, M.; Jul, E.: Cataloging Internet resources : the convergence of libraries and Internet resources (1996) 0.11 
    0.11279951 = product of:
  0.22559902 = sum of:
    0.22559902 = sum of:
      0.1737513 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1737513 = score(doc=602,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.80643946 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
      0.051847726 = weight(_text_:22 in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051847726 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper reviews issues related to the cataloging of Internet resources and considers shortand long-term directions for cataloging and the general provision of library services for remotely accessible, electronic information resources. The strengths and weakness of using a library catalog model to improve access to Internet resources are discussed and compared with a review of related efforts. Based on experience gained through two OCLC Internet cataloging projects, the authors recommend continued and vigorous appplication of library cataloging standards and methods for Internet resources with the expectation that catalogs, cataloging, and libraries in general will continue to evolve.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.197-238
  16. Snow, K.; Hoffman, G.L.: What makes an effective cataloging course? : a study of the factors that promote learning (2015) 0.11 
    0.11279951 = product of:
  0.22559902 = sum of:
    0.22559902 = sum of:
      0.1737513 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1737513 = score(doc=2609,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.80643946 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
      0.051847726 = weight(_text_:22 in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051847726 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper presents the results of a research study, a survey of library and information science master's degree holders who have taken a beginning cataloging course, to identify the elements of a beginning cataloging course that help students to learn cataloging concepts and skills. The results suggest that cataloging practice (the hands-on creation of bibliographic records or catalog cards), the effectiveness of the instructor, a balance of theory and practice, and placing cataloging in a real-world context contribute to effective learning. However, more research is needed to determine how, and to what the extent, each element should be incorporated into beginning cataloging courses.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Sauperl, A.; Saye, J.D.: Pebbles for the mosais of cataloging expertise : what do problems in expert systems for cataloging reveal about cataloging expertise? (1999) 0.11 
    0.11122297 = product of:
  0.22244594 = sum of:
    0.22244594 = sum of:
      0.17800502 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.17800502 = score(doc=103,freq=20.0), product of:
          0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.8261824 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
            4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
              20.0 = termFreq=20.0
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
      0.044440906 = weight(_text_:22 in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.044440906 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Twenty-five years of research in expert systems for descriptive cataloging and related areas are reviewed. Researchers who developed prototype expert cataloging systems in the 1980s found that cataloging rules are extremely comprehensive and complicated, but still insufficient to permit these systems accurate cataloging results. Those researchers also identified smaller areas that need to be pursued for successful implementation of expert cataloging systems. Subsequent research has focused on narrower areas. Cataloging rules were studied and more was learned about problems with their logic structure and organization. Another focus was optical reading of bibliographic elements in documents. Categories of responsibility and graphic design continue to pose problems. The visual characteristics of documents were studied to understand more about the automatic recognition of bibliographic elements necessary for the bibliographic description of documents. The systematic study of the cataloging process, necessary for development of expert systems, may result in improvement of manual working procedures and enrich the education of new catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.11 
    0.10904842 = sum of:
  0.08682796 = product of:
    0.2604839 = sum of:
      0.2604839 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2604839 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.46347958 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.022220453 = product of:
    0.044440906 = sum of:
      0.044440906 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.044440906 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  19. Simpson, B.; Williams, P.: ¬The cataloger's workstation revisited : utilizing cataloger's desktop (2001) 0.11 
    0.10635508 = product of:
  0.21271016 = sum of:
    0.21271016 = sum of:
      0.16086243 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16086243 = score(doc=4121,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.7466178 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
      0.051847726 = weight(_text_:22 in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051847726 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A few years into the development of Cataloger's Desktop, an electronic cataloging tool aggregator available through the Library of Congress, is an opportune time to assess its impact on cataloging operations. A search for online cataloging tools on the Internet indicates a proliferation of cataloging tool aggregators which provide access to online documentation related to cataloging practices and procedures. Cataloger's Desktop stands out as a leader among these aggregators. Results of a survey to assess 159 academic ARL and large public libraries' reasons for use or non-use of Cataloger's Desktop highlight the necessity of developing strategies for its successful implementation including training staff, providing documentation, and managing technical issues.
    Date
    28. 7.2006 20:09:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 33(2001) no.1, S.21-31
  20. Charbonneau, M.D.: Production benchmarks for catalogers in academic libraries : are we there yet? (2005) 0.11 
    0.10635508 = product of:
  0.21271016 = sum of:
    0.21271016 = sum of:
      0.16086243 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16086243 = score(doc=128,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.21545486 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.7466178 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
      0.051847726 = weight(_text_:22 in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051847726 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19143954 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.054668434 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper examines existing library and personnel literature to determine whether any strides have been made among academic libraries in determining cataloging productivity benchmarks. The perceived importance of performance evaluations based on quantitative and qualitative standards is explored, as is the intended effect of established cataloging production norms. The pros and cons of cataloging benchmarks are analyzed from four different perspectives: library administration, library human resources, cataloging managers, and cataloging staff. The paper concludes that additional research is needed in order to determine whether established production cataloging benchmarks are feasible and meaningful within academic libraries.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 4899
  • m 511
  • el 208
  • s 206
  • b 46
  • x 35
  • i 23
  • r 22
  • ? 10
  • n 7
  • p 7
  • h 4
  • d 3
  • ag 2
  • l 2
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications