Search (3651 results, page 1 of 183)

  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10 
    0.09603883 = sum of:
  0.0764693 = product of:
    0.2294079 = sum of:
      0.2294079 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2294079 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.40818602 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048146434 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.019569531 = product of:
    0.039139062 = sum of:
      0.039139062 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039139062 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1686006 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048146434 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.08 
    0.08003236 = sum of:
  0.06372442 = product of:
    0.19117326 = sum of:
      0.19117326 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19117326 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.40818602 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048146434 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.016307943 = product of:
    0.032615885 = sum of:
      0.032615885 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032615885 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1686006 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048146434 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  3. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.08 
    0.0764693 = product of:
  0.1529386 = sum of:
    0.1529386 = product of:
      0.4588158 = sum of:
        0.4588158 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4588158 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40818602 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048146434 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  4. Arsenault, C.: Testing the impact of syllable aggregation in romanized fields of Chinese language bibliographic records (2000) 0.07 
    0.07468777 = product of:
  0.14937554 = sum of:
    0.14937554 = product of:
      0.2987511 = sum of:
        0.2987511 = weight(_text_:spaced in 87) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2987511 = score(doc=87,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.51026917 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048146434 = queryNorm
            0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 87, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=87)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Today, two Romanization systems for Chinese data are in use in most libraries in the Western world: 1) Wade-Giles, and 2) Hanyu pinyin (simply referred to as pinyin). In 1997, the Library of Congress finally officially announced the adoption of pinyin for Romanizing Chinese data in its bibliographic records. One of the main problems in implementing the pinyin standard for library use is that pinyin, as opposed to Wade-Giles, aggregates Chinese "words" into single linguistic units. Chinese characters represent monosyllabic morphemes rather than words and are equally spaced from one another, and the Chinese text, in its original form, does not provide visual cues as to where a word starts or ends. When the script is romanized it is however essential that syllables or words be separated from one another, since, in most information retrieval techniques, the identification of "visual words" is required. In this respect, the Romanized strings could be divided either in monosyllables or in polysyllable words. This study aims to explore the impact of using either unaggregated pinyin (monosyllabic) or aggregated pinyin (polysyllabic) Romanization in Chinese-language bibliographic records. An experiment, using transaction log analysis, was carried out to observe variations in the retrieval performance of title searches-both phrase and keyword-in a large OPAC of Chinese language records. General results are presented and a summary of the pros and cons of using either method is given
  5. Yoshikane, F.; Kageura, K.; Tsuji, K.: ¬A method for the comparative analysis of concentration of author productivity, giving consideration to the effect of sample size dependency of statistical measures (2003) 0.07 
    0.07468777 = product of:
  0.14937554 = sum of:
    0.14937554 = product of:
      0.2987511 = sum of:
        0.2987511 = weight(_text_:spaced in 5123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2987511 = score(doc=5123,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.51026917 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048146434 = queryNorm
            0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 5123, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5123)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Studies of the concentration of author productivity based upon counts of papers by individual authors will produce measures that change systematically with sample size. Yoshikane, Kageura, and Tsuji seek a statistical framework which will avoid this scale effect problem. Using the number of authors in a field as an absolute concentration measure, and Gini's index as a relative concentration measure, they describe four literatures form both viewpoints with measures insensitive to one another. Both measures will increase with sample size. They then plot profiles of the two measures on the basis of a Monte-Carlo simulation of 1000 trials for 20 equally spaced intervals and compare the characteristics of the literatures. Using data from conferences hosted by four academic societies between 1992 and 1997, they find a coefficient of loss exceeding 0.15 indicating measures will depend highly on sample size. The simulation shows that a larger sample size leads to lower absolute concentration and higher relative concentration. Comparisons made at the same sample size present quite different results than the original data and allow direct comparison of population characteristics.
  6. #220 0.06 
    0.06457616 = product of:
  0.12915231 = sum of:
    0.12915231 = product of:
      0.25830463 = sum of:
        0.25830463 = weight(_text_:22 in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25830463 = score(doc=219,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1686006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048146434 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  7. #1387 0.06 
    0.06457616 = product of:
  0.12915231 = sum of:
    0.12915231 = product of:
      0.25830463 = sum of:
        0.25830463 = weight(_text_:22 in 1386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25830463 = score(doc=1386,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1686006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048146434 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 1386, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=1386)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  8. #2103 0.06 
    0.06457616 = product of:
  0.12915231 = sum of:
    0.12915231 = product of:
      0.25830463 = sum of:
        0.25830463 = weight(_text_:22 in 2102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25830463 = score(doc=2102,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1686006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048146434 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 2102, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2102)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  9. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.06 
    0.06372442 = product of:
  0.12744884 = sum of:
    0.12744884 = product of:
      0.3823465 = sum of:
        0.3823465 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3823465 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40818602 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048146434 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  10. Dobreski, B.; Snow, K.; Moulaison-Sandy, H.: On overlap and otherness : a comparison of three vocabularies' approaches to LGBTQ+ identity (2022) 0.06 
    0.060888615 = product of:
  0.12177723 = sum of:
    0.12177723 = product of:
      0.36533168 = sum of:
        0.36533168 = weight(_text_:lcsh's in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36533168 = score(doc=1141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.47689658 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048146434 = queryNorm
            0.7660606 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Bibliographic records can include information from controlled vocabularies to capture identities about individuals, especially about authors or intended audiences; personal name authority records can also contain information about identity. Employing a systematic analysis of the overlap of the Homosaurus, Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), and Library of Congress Demographic Group Terms (LCDGT), this article explores the extent to which LGBTQ+ identities are represented in the three vocabularies. Despite LCSH's long, iterative history of development and the faceted, post-coordinate nature of LCDGT, neither vocabulary was found to be adequate in covering the complex, LGBTQ+ identities represented in the Homosaurus.
  11. Dean, R.J.: FAST: development of simplified headings for metadata (2004) 0.05 
    0.05219024 = product of:
  0.10438048 = sum of:
    0.10438048 = product of:
      0.31314144 = sum of:
        0.31314144 = weight(_text_:lcsh's in 5682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31314144 = score(doc=5682,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.47689658 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048146434 = queryNorm
            0.65662336 = fieldWeight in 5682, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5682)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Subject Headings schema (LCSH) is the most commonly used and widely accepted subject vocabulary for general application. It is the de facto universal controlled vocabulary and has been a model for developing subject heading systems by many countries. However, LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control. Recent trends, driven to a large extent by the rapid growth of the Web, are forcing changes in bibliographic control systems to make them easier to use, understand, and apply, and subject headings are no exception. The purpose of adapting the LCSH with a simplified syntax to create FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) headings is to retain the very rich vocabulary of LCSH while making the schema easier to understand, control, apply, and use. The schema maintains compatibility with LCSH--any valid Library of Congress subject heading can be converted to FAST headings.
  12. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.05 
    0.050979536 = product of:
  0.10195907 = sum of:
    0.10195907 = product of:
      0.3058772 = sum of:
        0.3058772 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3058772 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40818602 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048146434 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  13. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.05 
    0.050979536 = product of:
  0.10195907 = sum of:
    0.10195907 = product of:
      0.3058772 = sum of:
        0.3058772 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3058772 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40818602 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048146434 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  14. #2434 0.05 
    0.04566224 = product of:
  0.09132448 = sum of:
    0.09132448 = product of:
      0.18264896 = sum of:
        0.18264896 = weight(_text_:22 in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18264896 = score(doc=2433,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1686006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048146434 = queryNorm
            1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    4. 9.2011 12:28:22
  15. #2819 0.05 
    0.04566224 = product of:
  0.09132448 = sum of:
    0.09132448 = product of:
      0.18264896 = sum of:
        0.18264896 = weight(_text_:22 in 2818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18264896 = score(doc=2818,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1686006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048146434 = queryNorm
            1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 2818, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2818)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 19:49:25
  16. #4316 0.05 
    0.04566224 = product of:
  0.09132448 = sum of:
    0.09132448 = product of:
      0.18264896 = sum of:
        0.18264896 = weight(_text_:22 in 4315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18264896 = score(doc=4315,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1686006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048146434 = queryNorm
            1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 4315, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=4315)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 19:49:25
  17. #7401 0.05 
    0.04566224 = product of:
  0.09132448 = sum of:
    0.09132448 = product of:
      0.18264896 = sum of:
        0.18264896 = weight(_text_:22 in 7400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18264896 = score(doc=7400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1686006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048146434 = queryNorm
            1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 7400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=7400)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 19:49:25
  18. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.04 
    0.044607095 = product of:
  0.08921419 = sum of:
    0.08921419 = product of:
      0.26764256 = sum of:
        0.26764256 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26764256 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40818602 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048146434 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  19. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.04 
    0.044607095 = product of:
  0.08921419 = sum of:
    0.08921419 = product of:
      0.26764256 = sum of:
        0.26764256 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26764256 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.40818602 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048146434 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  20. O'Neill, E.T.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; Kammerer, K.; Vizine-Goetz, D.; Chan, L.M.; El-Hoshy, L.: FAST: faceted application of subject terminology (2003) 0.04 
    0.043491866 = product of:
  0.08698373 = sum of:
    0.08698373 = product of:
      0.2609512 = sum of:
        0.2609512 = weight(_text_:lcsh's in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2609512 = score(doc=3816,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.47689658 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048146434 = queryNorm
            0.54718614 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Subject Headings schema (LCSH) is by far the most commonly used and widely accepted subject vocabulary for general application. It is the de facto universal controlled vocabulary and has been a model for developing subject heading systems by many countries. However, LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control. Recent trends, driven to a large extent by the rapid growth of the Web, are forcing changes in bibliographic control systems to make them easier to use, understand, and apply, and subject headings are no exception. The purpose of adapting the LCSH with a simplified syntax to create FAST is to retain the very rich vocabulary of LCSH while making the schema easier to understand, control, apply, and use. The schema maintains upward compatibility with LCSH, and any valid set of LC subject headings can be converted to FAST headings.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3051
  • m 344
  • el 161
  • s 139
  • b 39
  • x 35
  • i 23
  • r 17
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications