Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Dahlberg, I."
  1. Dahlberg, I.: Normung und Klassifikation (1978) 0.01
    0.00988627 = product of:
      0.04943135 = sum of:
        0.04943135 = product of:
          0.0988627 = sum of:
            0.0988627 = weight(_text_:22 in 1612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0988627 = score(doc=1612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    DK-Mitteilungen. 22(1978) Nr.5/6, S.13-18
  2. Dahlberg, I.: Kolloquium Einheitsklassifikation (1975) 0.01
    0.00988627 = product of:
      0.04943135 = sum of:
        0.04943135 = product of:
          0.0988627 = sum of:
            0.0988627 = weight(_text_:22 in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0988627 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 26(1975), S.22-25
  3. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual definitions for INTERCONCEPT (1981) 0.01
    0.00988627 = product of:
      0.04943135 = sum of:
        0.04943135 = product of:
          0.0988627 = sum of:
            0.0988627 = weight(_text_:22 in 1630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0988627 = score(doc=1630,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 1630, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1630)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    International classification. 8(1981), S.16-22
  4. Dahlberg, I.: Why a new universal classification system is needed (2017) 0.01
    0.008278403 = product of:
      0.041392017 = sum of:
        0.041392017 = product of:
          0.082784034 = sum of:
            0.082784034 = weight(_text_:etc in 3614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082784034 = score(doc=3614,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.41891038 = fieldWeight in 3614, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3614)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Research history of the last 70 years highlights various systems for contents assessment and retrieval of scientific literature, such as universal classifications, thesauri, ontologies etc., which have followed developments of their own, notwithstanding a general trend towards interoperability, i.e. either to become instruments for cooperation or to widen their scope to encompass neighbouring fields within their framework. In the case of thesauri and ontologies, the endeavour to upgrade them into a universal system was bound to miscarry. This paper purports to indicate ways to gain from past experience and possibly rally material achievements while updating and promoting the ontologically-based faceted Information Coding Classification as a progressive universal system fit for meeting whatever requirements in the fields of information and science at large.
  5. Dahlberg, I.: Zur Theorie des Begriffs (1974) 0.01
    0.007095774 = product of:
      0.03547887 = sum of:
        0.03547887 = product of:
          0.07095774 = sum of:
            0.07095774 = weight(_text_:etc in 1617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07095774 = score(doc=1617,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.35906604 = fieldWeight in 1617, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1617)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    A concept is regarded as the common element of both classification systems and thesauri. Reality and knowledge are not represented by words or terms but by the meanings "behind" these tokens. A concept of, say, an object, a property of an object, a process, etc. is derived from verbal statements on these as subjects and may therefore be defined as the whole of true and possible predicates that can be collected on a given subject. It is from these predicates that the characteristics of the corresponding concepts can be derived. Common characteristics in different concepts lead to relationsbetween concepts, which relations in turn are factors for the formation of concept systems. Different kinds of relationships as well as different kinds of concepts are distinguished. It is pointed out that an orderly supply of the elements for propositions (informative statements) on new knowledge requires the construction and availability of such concept systems
  6. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987) 0.01
    0.0069203894 = product of:
      0.034601945 = sum of:
        0.034601945 = product of:
          0.06920389 = sum of:
            0.06920389 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06920389 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Pages
    S.9-22
  7. Dahlberg, I.: Toward establishment of compatibility between indexing languages (1981) 0.01
    0.0054937815 = product of:
      0.027468907 = sum of:
        0.027468907 = product of:
          0.054937813 = sum of:
            0.054937813 = weight(_text_:problems in 5218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054937813 = score(doc=5218,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.36482072 = fieldWeight in 5218, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5218)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines previous work done in the field of compatibility between indexing langugaes (IL), and describes the scope, limitations and advantages of establishing compatibility between IL. Suggests methods for verbal comparisons between IL as well as generation of an alphabetical comparison matrix M1. Conceptual comparisons, however, demand a conceptual reorganization of M1 into a compatibiliy matrix M2 with its two alternatices, namely a system-related matrix M3 and a hierarchical matrix M4. In conclusion, the use of a compatibility matrix and organizational problems are described
  8. Dahlberg, I.: How to improve ISKO's standing : ten desiderata for knowledge organization (2011) 0.01
    0.0051209345 = product of:
      0.025604673 = sum of:
        0.025604673 = product of:
          0.051209345 = sum of:
            0.051209345 = weight(_text_:etc in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051209345 = score(doc=4300,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.2591336 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    1. Recognize the units in an order system (classification system, thesaurus, ontology, etc.) as concepts/knowledge units, analyse their essential characteristics, and use these characteristics when creating a Knowledge Order System. 2. Recognize the units in an order system (classification system, thesaurus, ontology, etc.) as concepts/knowledge units, analyse their essential characteristics, and use these characteristics when creating a Knowledge Order System. 3. An ISKO group should elaborate a curriculum for the various KO activities to be published after approval by the ISKO Executive Board (EB). Together with this, the qualifying titles of different professionals (teacher, professor, system designer etc.) should also be discussed by the ISKO EB, adopted and proposed for acknowledgement by official institutions; and, 2) It may be possible for ISKO to establish its own Academy and also take care of teaching with the elaborated curricula. 4. Every national ISKO Chapter and the General Secretariat should make efforts to employ a paid expert for the necessary secretarial work, and seek financial support therefore from national or international organizations, in order to become more professionalised. 5. The ISKO Executive Board should decide to elaborate and publish an order system of all KO-relevant concepts to serve as a model and perhaps sometimes as a standard for similar work in other scientific disciplines and knowledge fields.
  9. Dahlberg, I.: Grundlagen universaler Wissensordnung : Probleme und Möglichkeiten eines universalen Klassifikationssystems des Wissens (1974) 0.00
    0.004943135 = product of:
      0.024715675 = sum of:
        0.024715675 = product of:
          0.04943135 = sum of:
            0.04943135 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04943135 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Zugleich Dissertation Univ. Düsseldorf. - Rez. in: ZfBB. 22(1975) S.53-57 (H.-A. Koch)
  10. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010) 0.00
    0.003954508 = product of:
      0.019772539 = sum of:
        0.019772539 = product of:
          0.039545078 = sum of:
            0.039545078 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039545078 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  11. De Luca, E.W.; Dahlberg, I.: Including knowledge domains from the ICC into the multilingual lexical linked data cloud (2014) 0.00
    0.0034953242 = product of:
      0.01747662 = sum of:
        0.01747662 = product of:
          0.03495324 = sum of:
            0.03495324 = weight(_text_:22 in 1493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03495324 = score(doc=1493,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1493, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1493)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:01:18
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  12. Luca, E.W. de; Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die Multilingual Lexical Linked Data Cloud : eine mögliche Zugangsoptimierung? (2014) 0.00
    0.002965881 = product of:
      0.014829405 = sum of:
        0.014829405 = product of:
          0.02965881 = sum of:
            0.02965881 = weight(_text_:22 in 1736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02965881 = score(doc=1736,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1736, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1736)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2014 19:00:13