Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Holley, R.P."
  1. Holley, R.P.: Classification in the USA (1986) 0.00
    0.0048070587 = product of:
      0.024035294 = sum of:
        0.024035294 = product of:
          0.048070587 = sum of:
            0.048070587 = weight(_text_:problems in 1524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048070587 = score(doc=1524,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.31921813 = fieldWeight in 1524, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1524)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    United States libraries use classification to provide subject browsing in open stacks. The DDC used by 85% of American libraries, is a theoretical, universal attempt to organize all knowledge. The LCC lacks intellectual consistency since it was based upon library warrant to organize materials in one collection. Many academic libraries use LCC because the Library of Congress' shared bibliographic records with the LCC call numbers reflect the collecting interests of academic libraries. LCC is more hospitable to change than DDC whoese phoenix schedules have encountered resistance throughout the world. Classification currently receives less attention than subject headings since United States librarians place great hope in the computer to resolve subject heading problems while remaining conservative about classification
  2. Holley, R.P.: Cataloging : an exciting subject for exciting times (2002) 0.00
    0.0048070587 = product of:
      0.024035294 = sum of:
        0.024035294 = product of:
          0.048070587 = sum of:
            0.048070587 = weight(_text_:problems in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048070587 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.31921813 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Cataloging remains a fundamental component of library and information science and has many lessons to teach the architects of the Internet age. All students can benefit from taking a cataloging course, especially if it stresses cataloging as one specific answer to the problems of managing information and places cataloging within a larger context that also includes indexing and Internet search engines. Students deserve cataloging courses that combine theory and practice, avoid memorization, and require them to show a mastery of core principles rather than picky details. This paper includes specific suggestions on how to make cataloging exciting.
  3. Pope, J.T.; Holley, R.P.: Google Book Search and metadata (2011) 0.00
    0.0048070587 = product of:
      0.024035294 = sum of:
        0.024035294 = product of:
          0.048070587 = sum of:
            0.048070587 = weight(_text_:problems in 1887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048070587 = score(doc=1887,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.31921813 = fieldWeight in 1887, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1887)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article summarizes published documents on metadata provided by Google for books scanned as part of the Google Book Search (GBS) project and provides suggestions for improvement. The faulty, misleading, and confusing metadata in current Google records can pose potentially serious problems for users of GBS. Google admits that it took data, which proved to be inaccurate, from many sources and is attempting to correct errors. Some argue that metadata is not needed with keyword searching; but optical character recognition (OCR) errors, synonym control, and materials in foreign languages make reliable metadata a requirement for academic researchers. The authors recommend that users should be able to submit error reports to Google to correct faulty metadata.
  4. Holley, R.P.: Subject access tools in English for Canadian topics : Canadian extensions to U.S. subject access tools (2008) 0.00
    0.0034953242 = product of:
      0.01747662 = sum of:
        0.01747662 = product of:
          0.03495324 = sum of:
            0.03495324 = weight(_text_:22 in 2553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03495324 = score(doc=2553,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2553, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2553)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:18
  5. Holley, R.P.: Is popular culture forgotten? (1993) 0.00
    0.0034601947 = product of:
      0.017300973 = sum of:
        0.017300973 = product of:
          0.034601945 = sum of:
            0.034601945 = weight(_text_:22 in 5054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034601945 = score(doc=5054,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5054, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5054)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.1, S.13-17
  6. Holley, R.P.: ¬The Répertoire de Vedettes-matière de l'Université Laval Library, 1946-92 : Francophone subject access in North America and Europe (2002) 0.00
    0.0024715676 = product of:
      0.0123578375 = sum of:
        0.0123578375 = product of:
          0.024715675 = sum of:
            0.024715675 = weight(_text_:22 in 159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024715675 = score(doc=159,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 159, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=159)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22