Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Liu, Y."
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Liu, Y.; Rafols, I.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A framework for knowledge integration and diffusion (2012) 0.01
    0.01003494 = product of:
      0.050174702 = sum of:
        0.050174702 = product of:
          0.100349404 = sum of:
            0.100349404 = weight(_text_:etc in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.100349404 = score(doc=297,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.50779605 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to introduce a general framework for the analysis of knowledge integration and diffusion using bibliometric data. Design/methodology/approach - The authors propose that in order to characterise knowledge integration and diffusion of a given issue (the source, for example articles on a topic or by an organisation, etc.), one has to choose a set of elements from the source (the intermediary set, for example references, keywords, etc.). This set can then be classified into categories (cats), thus making it possible to investigate its diversity. The set can also be characterised according to the coherence of a network associated to it. Findings - This framework allows a methodology to be developed to assess knowledge integration and diffusion. Such methodologies can be useful for a number of science policy issues, including the assessment of interdisciplinarity in research and dynamics of research networks. Originality/value - The main contribution of this article is to provide a simple and easy to use generalisation of an existing approach to study interdisciplinarity, bringing knowledge integration and knowledge diffusion together in one framework.
  2. Liu, Y.; Li, W.; Huang, Z.; Fang, Q.: ¬A fast method based on multiple clustering for name disambiguation in bibliographic citations (2015) 0.01
    0.0059131454 = product of:
      0.029565725 = sum of:
        0.029565725 = product of:
          0.05913145 = sum of:
            0.05913145 = weight(_text_:etc in 1672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05913145 = score(doc=1672,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.2992217 = fieldWeight in 1672, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1672)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Name ambiguity in the context of bibliographic citation affects the quality of services in digital libraries. Previous methods are not widely applied in practice because of their high computational complexity and their strong dependency on excessive attributes, such as institutional affiliation, research area, address, etc., which are difficult to obtain in practice. To solve this problem, we propose a novel coarse-to-fine framework for name disambiguation which sequentially employs 3 common and easily accessible attributes (i.e., coauthor name, article title, and publication venue). Our proposed framework is based on multiple clustering and consists of 3 steps: (a) clustering articles by coauthorship and obtaining rough clusters, that is fragments; (b) clustering fragments obtained in step 1 by title information and getting bigger fragments; (c) and clustering fragments obtained in step 2 by the latent relations among venues. Experimental results on a Digital Bibliography and Library Project (DBLP) data set show that our method outperforms the existing state-of-the-art methods by 2.4% to 22.7% on the average pairwise F1 score and is 10 to 100 times faster in terms of execution time.
  3. Qin, C.; Liu, Y.; Mou, J.; Chen, J.: User adoption of a hybrid social tagging approach in an online knowledge community (2019) 0.00
    0.0024715676 = product of:
      0.0123578375 = sum of:
        0.0123578375 = product of:
          0.024715675 = sum of:
            0.024715675 = weight(_text_:22 in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024715675 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036484417 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Authors