-
Edmundson, H.P.; Wyllis, R.E.: Problems in automatic abstracting (1964)
0.01
0.009614117 = product of:
0.048070587 = sum of:
0.048070587 = product of:
0.096141174 = sum of:
0.096141174 = weight(_text_:problems in 3670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096141174 = score(doc=3670,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.63843626 = fieldWeight in 3670, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3670)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Kuhlen, R.: In Richtung Summarizing für Diskurse in K3 (2006)
0.01
0.008278403 = product of:
0.041392017 = sum of:
0.041392017 = product of:
0.082784034 = sum of:
0.082784034 = weight(_text_:etc in 6067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082784034 = score(doc=6067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.41891038 = fieldWeight in 6067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6067)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Der Bedarf nach Summarizing-Leistungen, in Situationen der Fachinformation, aber auch in kommunikativen Umgebungen (Diskursen) wird aufgezeigt. Summarizing wird dazu in den Kontext des bisherigen (auch automatischen) Abstracting/Extracting gestellt. Der aktuelle Forschungsstand, vor allem mit Blick auf Multi-Document-Summarizing, wird dargestellt. Summarizing ist eine wichtige Funktion in komplex und umfänglich werdenden Diskussionen in elektronischen Foren. Dies wird am Beispiel des e-Learning-Systems K3 aufgezeigt. Rudimentäre Summarizing-Funktionen von K3 und des zugeordneten K3VIS-Systems werden dargestellt. Der Rahmen für ein elaborierteres, Template-orientiertes Summarizing unter Verwendung der vielfältigen Auszeichnungsfunktionen von K3 (Rollen, Diskurstypen, Inhaltstypen etc.) wird aufgespannt.
-
McKeown, K.; Robin, J.; Kukich, K.: Generating concise natural language summaries (1995)
0.01
0.006867227 = product of:
0.034336135 = sum of:
0.034336135 = product of:
0.06867227 = sum of:
0.06867227 = weight(_text_:problems in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06867227 = score(doc=2932,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.4560259 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Description of the problems for summary generation, the applications developed (for basket ball games - STREAK and for telephone network planning activity - PLANDOC), the linguistic constructions that the systems use to convey information concisely and the textual constraints that determine what information gets included
-
Su, H.: Automatic abstracting (1996)
0.01
0.006867227 = product of:
0.034336135 = sum of:
0.034336135 = product of:
0.06867227 = sum of:
0.06867227 = weight(_text_:problems in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06867227 = score(doc=150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.4560259 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Presents an introductory overview of research into the automatic construction of abstracts from the texts of documents. Discusses the origin and definition of automatic abstracting; reasons for using automatic abstracting; methods of automatic abstracting; and evaluation problems
-
Kannan, R.; Ghinea, G.; Swaminathan, S.: What do you wish to see? : A summarization system for movies based on user preferences (2015)
0.00
0.0047305166 = product of:
0.023652581 = sum of:
0.023652581 = product of:
0.047305163 = sum of:
0.047305163 = weight(_text_:etc in 2683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047305163 = score(doc=2683,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.23937736 = fieldWeight in 2683, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2683)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Video summarization aims at producing a compact version of a full-length video while preserving the significant content of the original video. Movie summarization condenses a full-length movie into a summary that still retains the most significant and interesting content of the original movie. In the past, several movie summarization systems have been proposed to generate a movie summary based on low-level video features such as color, motion, texture, etc. However, a generic summary, which is common to everyone and is produced based only on low-level video features will not satisfy every user. As users' preferences for the summary differ vastly for the same movie, there is a need for a personalized movie summarization system nowadays. To address this demand, this paper proposes a novel system to generate semantically meaningful video summaries for the same movie, which are tailored to the preferences and interests of a user. For a given movie, shots and scenes are automatically detected and their high-level features are semi-automatically annotated. Preferences over high-level movie features are explicitly collected from the user using a query interface. The user preferences are generated by means of a stored-query. Movie summaries are generated at shot level and scene level, where shots or scenes are selected for summary skim based on the similarity measured between shots and scenes, and the user's preferences. The proposed movie summarization system is evaluated subjectively using a sample of 20 subjects with eight movies in the English language. The quality of the generated summaries is assessed by informativeness, enjoyability, relevance, and acceptance metrics and Quality of Perception measures. Further, the usability of the proposed summarization system is subjectively evaluated by conducting a questionnaire survey. The experimental results on the performance of the proposed movie summarization approach show the potential of the proposed system.
-
Goh, A.; Hui, S.C.: TES: a text extraction system (1996)
0.00
0.003954508 = product of:
0.019772539 = sum of:
0.019772539 = product of:
0.039545078 = sum of:
0.039545078 = weight(_text_:22 in 6599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039545078 = score(doc=6599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6599)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 26. 2.1997 10:22:43
-
Robin, J.; McKeown, K.: Empirically designing and evaluating a new revision-based model for summary generation (1996)
0.00
0.003954508 = product of:
0.019772539 = sum of:
0.019772539 = product of:
0.039545078 = sum of:
0.039545078 = weight(_text_:22 in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039545078 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 16:22:15
-
Jones, P.A.; Bradbeer, P.V.G.: Discovery of optimal weights in a concept selection system (1996)
0.00
0.003954508 = product of:
0.019772539 = sum of:
0.019772539 = product of:
0.039545078 = sum of:
0.039545078 = weight(_text_:22 in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039545078 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
-
Finegan-Dollak, C.; Radev, D.R.: Sentence simplification, compression, and disaggregation for summarization of sophisticated documents (2016)
0.00
0.0034336136 = product of:
0.017168067 = sum of:
0.017168067 = product of:
0.034336135 = sum of:
0.034336135 = weight(_text_:problems in 3122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034336135 = score(doc=3122,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.22801295 = fieldWeight in 3122, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3122)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Sophisticated documents like legal cases and biomedical articles can contain unusually long sentences. Extractive summarizers can select such sentences-potentially adding hundreds of unnecessary words to the summary-or exclude them and lose important content. Sentence simplification or compression seems on the surface to be a promising solution. However, compression removes words before the selection algorithm can use them, and simplification generates sentences that may be ambiguous in an extractive summary. We therefore compare the performance of an extractive summarizer selecting from the sentences of the original document with that of the summarizer selecting from sentences shortened in three ways: simplification, compression, and disaggregation, which splits one sentence into several according to rules designed to keep all meaning. We find that on legal cases and biomedical articles, these shortening methods generate ungrammatical output. Human evaluators performed an extrinsic evaluation consisting of comprehension questions about the summaries. Evaluators given compressed, simplified, or disaggregated versions of the summaries answered fewer questions correctly than did those given summaries with unaltered sentences. Error analysis suggests 2 causes: Altered sentences sometimes interact with the sentence selection algorithm, and alterations to sentences sometimes obscure information in the summary. We discuss future work to alleviate these problems.
-
Vanderwende, L.; Suzuki, H.; Brockett, J.M.; Nenkova, A.: Beyond SumBasic : task-focused summarization with sentence simplification and lexical expansion (2007)
0.00
0.002965881 = product of:
0.014829405 = sum of:
0.014829405 = product of:
0.02965881 = sum of:
0.02965881 = weight(_text_:22 in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02965881 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- In recent years, there has been increased interest in topic-focused multi-document summarization. In this task, automatic summaries are produced in response to a specific information request, or topic, stated by the user. The system we have designed to accomplish this task comprises four main components: a generic extractive summarization system, a topic-focusing component, sentence simplification, and lexical expansion of topic words. This paper details each of these components, together with experiments designed to quantify their individual contributions. We include an analysis of our results on two large datasets commonly used to evaluate task-focused summarization, the DUC2005 and DUC2006 datasets, using automatic metrics. Additionally, we include an analysis of our results on the DUC2006 task according to human evaluation metrics. In the human evaluation of system summaries compared to human summaries, i.e., the Pyramid method, our system ranked first out of 22 systems in terms of overall mean Pyramid score; and in the human evaluation of summary responsiveness to the topic, our system ranked third out of 35 systems.
-
Wu, Y.-f.B.; Li, Q.; Bot, R.S.; Chen, X.: Finding nuggets in documents : a machine learning approach (2006)
0.00
0.0024715676 = product of:
0.0123578375 = sum of:
0.0123578375 = product of:
0.024715675 = sum of:
0.024715675 = weight(_text_:22 in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024715675 = score(doc=5290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:25:48
-
Kim, H.H.; Kim, Y.H.: Generic speech summarization of transcribed lecture videos : using tags and their semantic relations (2016)
0.00
0.0024715676 = product of:
0.0123578375 = sum of:
0.0123578375 = product of:
0.024715675 = sum of:
0.024715675 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024715675 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 12:29:41
-
Oh, H.; Nam, S.; Zhu, Y.: Structured abstract summarization of scientific articles : summarization using full-text section information (2023)
0.00
0.0024715676 = product of:
0.0123578375 = sum of:
0.0123578375 = product of:
0.024715675 = sum of:
0.024715675 = weight(_text_:22 in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024715675 = score(doc=889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:57:12
-
Jiang, Y.; Meng, R.; Huang, Y.; Lu, W.; Liu, J.: Generating keyphrases for readers : a controllable keyphrase generation framework (2023)
0.00
0.0024715676 = product of:
0.0123578375 = sum of:
0.0123578375 = product of:
0.024715675 = sum of:
0.024715675 = weight(_text_:22 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024715675 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 14:55:20
