-
Panizzi, A.K.C.B.: Passages in my official life (1871)
0.01
0.0097869085 = product of:
0.04893454 = sum of:
0.04893454 = product of:
0.09786908 = sum of:
0.09786908 = weight(_text_:22 in 935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09786908 = score(doc=935,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 935, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=935)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 7.2007 12:05:26
22. 7.2007 12:08:24
-
Soper, M.E.: Nineteen Thirty-Eight to today : problems in cataloging then and now (1987)
0.01
0.009515509 = product of:
0.047577545 = sum of:
0.047577545 = product of:
0.09515509 = sum of:
0.09515509 = weight(_text_:problems in 397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09515509 = score(doc=397,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.63188803 = fieldWeight in 397, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=397)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- In 1938 the Catalog Section of the American Library Association (ALA) mailed a questionnaire to approximately 1600 librarians, asking their opinions concerning various problems in cataloging and classification. Many changes have occurred since then, but there are problems cited in 1938 that are still with us in one form or another. The items listed in the questionnaire are discussed, and conclusions drawn as to their pertinence for today.
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The history of "The Work" in the modern catalog (2003)
0.01
0.008362452 = product of:
0.041812256 = sum of:
0.041812256 = product of:
0.08362451 = sum of:
0.08362451 = weight(_text_:etc in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08362451 = score(doc=5631,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.4231634 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- From a historical perspective, one could consider the modern library catalog to be that bibliographical apparatus that stretches at least from Thomas Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian Library at Oxford to the near present. Mai and other recent authors have suggested postmodern approaches to knowledge organization. In these, we realize that there is no single and unique order of knowledge or documents but rather there are many appropriate orders, all of them contextually dependent. Works (oeuvres, opera, Werke, etc.), as are musical works, literary works, works of art, etc., are and always have been key entities for information retrieval. Yet catalogs in the modern era were designed to inventory (first) and retrieve (second) specific documents. From Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian until the late twentieth century, developments are epistemologically pragmatic--reflected in the structure of catalog records, in the rules for main entry headings, and in the rules for filing in card catalogs. After 1980 developments become empirical-reflected in research conducted by Tillett, Yee, Smiraglia, Leazer, Carlyle, and Vellucci. The influence of empiricism on the pragmatic notion of "the work" has led to increased focus on the concept of the work. The challenge for the postmodern online catalog is to fully embrace the concept of "the work," finally to facilitate it as a prime objective for information retrieval.
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The history of "The Work" in the modern catalog (2003)
0.01
0.008362452 = product of:
0.041812256 = sum of:
0.041812256 = product of:
0.08362451 = sum of:
0.08362451 = weight(_text_:etc in 5652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08362451 = score(doc=5652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.4231634 = fieldWeight in 5652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- From a historical perspective, one could consider the modern library catalog to be that bibliographical apparatus that stretches at least from Thomas Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian Library at Oxford to the near present. Mai and other recent authors have suggested postmodern approaches to knowledge organization. In these, we realize that there is no single and unique order of knowledge or documents but rather there are many appropriate orders, all of them contextually dependent. Works (oeuvres, opera, Werke, etc.), as are musical works, literary works, works of art, etc., are and always have been key entities for information retrieval. Yet catalogs in the modern era were designed to inventory (first) and retrieve (second) specific documents. From Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian until the late twentieth century, developments are epistemologically pragmatic--reflected in the structure of catalog records, in the rules for main entry headings, and in the rules for filing in card catalogs. After 1980 developments become empirical-reflected in research conducted by Tillett, Yee, Smiraglia, Leazer, Carlyle, and Vellucci. The influence of empiricism on the pragmatic notion of "the work" has led to increased focus on the concept of the work. The challenge for the postmodern online catalog is to fully embrace the concept of "the work," finally to facilitate it as a prime objective for information retrieval.
-
Zerbst, H.-J.; Kaptein, O.: Gegenwärtiger Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Sacherschließung : Auswertung einer Umfrage an deutschen wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1993)
0.01
0.007726257 = product of:
0.038631286 = sum of:
0.038631286 = product of:
0.115893856 = sum of:
0.115893856 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.115893856 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3093153 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???
-
Umstätter, W.: Bibliographie, Kataloge, Suchmaschinen : Das Ende der Dokumentation als modernes Bibliothekswesen (2005)
0.01
0.007095774 = product of:
0.03547887 = sum of:
0.03547887 = product of:
0.07095774 = sum of:
0.07095774 = weight(_text_:etc in 4765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07095774 = score(doc=4765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19761753 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.35906604 = fieldWeight in 4765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4765)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Als Otlet und La Fontaine um 1900 den Begriff Bibliographie durch den moderneren Begriff Dokumentation ersetzten und im Sinne einer Dokumentationswissenschaft von Dokumentologie sprachen, um damit auch den Weg zu öffnen, immer mehr "Neue Medien", wie Lochkartensysteme, Filme, Mikrofiches, Schallplatten, Magnetbandaufzeichnungen, etc. in die bibliothekarische Wissensbewahrung zu integrieren, da geriet das Bibliothekswesen in eine Zerreißprobe, die für Deutschland besonders nachhaltig war. Eigentlich war es nur ein Zeichen dafür, dass die Bibliothekswissenschaft plötzlich eine so große Dynamik bekam, dass ein Teil ihrer Vertreter sich immer stärker an den rasanten Entwicklungen dieser "Neuen Medien", dann an den informationsverarbeitenden Maschinen und an der Digitalisierung orientierten, während sich andere um so mehr darum bemühten, alte Erfahrungen und das bereits etablierte Wissen nicht dem Untergang preis zu geben. Diese Zerreißprobe hat zunächst auch international eine tiefe Spaltung zwischen Dokumentation und Bibliothekswesen hervorgebracht. Die "alte" Bibliothek erschien zunehmend "verstaubt" gegenüber der modernen Dokumentation, die ihrerseits allerdings einen Namen trug, der sich als Berufsbild in der breiten Bevölkerung nie so recht durchsetzen konnte. Heute hat die Digitale Bibliothek beide wieder vereinigt und damit das Berufsbild Dokumentar auf einen speziellen Bereich, der Erschließung nicht publizierter Dokumente, neben dem Archivar fokussiert.
-
Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American Cataloging Alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2003)
0.00
0.004943135 = product of:
0.024715675 = sum of:
0.024715675 = product of:
0.04943135 = sum of:
0.04943135 = weight(_text_:22 in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04943135 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Pages
- S.3-22
-
Steinhagen, E.N.: Historical perspective of a union catalog in Chile : authorities and periodicals (2003)
0.00
0.004943135 = product of:
0.024715675 = sum of:
0.024715675 = product of:
0.04943135 = sum of:
0.04943135 = weight(_text_:22 in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04943135 = score(doc=4064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 29. 7.2006 20:06:22
-
Lubetzky, S.: Principles of cataloging (2001)
0.00
0.004855863 = product of:
0.024279313 = sum of:
0.024279313 = product of:
0.048558626 = sum of:
0.048558626 = weight(_text_:problems in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048558626 = score(doc=2627,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.322459 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- This report constitutes Phase I of a two-part study; a Phase II report will discuss subject cataloging. Phase I is concerned with the materials of a library as individual records (or documents) and as representations of certain works by certain authors--that is, with descriptive, or bibliographic, cataloging. Discussed in the report are (1) the history, role, function, and oblectives .of the author-and-title catalog; (2) problems and principles of descriptive catalogng, including the use and function of "main entry, the principle of authorship, and the process and problems of cataloging print and nonprint materials; (3) organization of the catalog; and (4) potentialities of automation. The considerations inherent in bibliographic cataloging, such as the distinction between the "book" and the "work," are said to be so elemental that they are essential not only to the effective control of library's materials but also to that of the information contained in the materials. Because of the special concern with information, the author includes a discussion of the "Bibliographic Dimensions of Information Control," 'prepared in collaboration with Robert M. Hayes, which also appears in "American Documentation," VOl.201 July 1969, p. 247-252.
-
Eversberg, B.: ADV und Zetteldruck : ein Widerspruch? (1975)
0.00
0.003954508 = product of:
0.019772539 = sum of:
0.019772539 = product of:
0.039545078 = sum of:
0.039545078 = weight(_text_:22 in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039545078 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 22(1975) H.5, S.387-390
-
Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American cataloging alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2002)
0.00
0.0034601947 = product of:
0.017300973 = sum of:
0.017300973 = product of:
0.034601945 = sum of:
0.034601945 = weight(_text_:22 in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034601945 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 35(2002) nos.1/2, S.3-22
-
Martínez-Arellano, F.F.: Cataloging and classification history in Mexico (2002)
0.00
0.0034336136 = product of:
0.017168067 = sum of:
0.017168067 = product of:
0.034336135 = sum of:
0.034336135 = weight(_text_:problems in 5484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034336135 = score(doc=5484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15058853 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.22801295 = fieldWeight in 5484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1274753 = idf(docFreq=1937, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5484)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- This article discusses cataloging and classification history in Mexico and how cataloging and classification have evolved according to the changes that libraries and library science have experienced on both a national and international level. The first part of the article refers to the first half of the twentieth century, detailing the origins of cataloging and classification history. The second part presents discussion of the development and consolidation of both cataloging and classification during the second half of the twentieth century. The article also discusses subject headings, automation, centralization, and union catalogs in Mexico. It discusses past difficulties in creating a union catalog at a national level and the advantages of automated systems in helping to develop this needed union catalog. The article discusses the need to resume publication of the Bibliografía Mexicana. One of the main problems that Mexican libraries have faced is a scarcity of librarians adequately prepared to perform cataloging and classification of their collections. This lack of librarians is even more acute in the Mexican states. There are insufficient numbers of students in library schools to provide the staffing that libraries demand not only for cataloguing and classification but also for many other library activities.
-
Pettee, J.: ¬The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog (1985)
0.00
0.001977254 = product of:
0.009886269 = sum of:
0.009886269 = product of:
0.019772539 = sum of:
0.019772539 = weight(_text_:22 in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019772539 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Footnote
- Original in: Pettee, J.: The history and theory of the alphabetical subject approach to books. New York: Wilson 1946. S.22-25.
-
Laaff, M.: Googles genialer Urahn (2011)
0.00
0.0012357838 = product of:
0.0061789188 = sum of:
0.0061789188 = product of:
0.0123578375 = sum of:
0.0123578375 = weight(_text_:22 in 4610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0123578375 = score(doc=4610,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12776221 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036484417 = queryNorm
0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 4610, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4610)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 24.10.2008 14:19:22
